The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Why don't you simply use, like the rest of the world, the birth years rounded as 0 as reference for a generation?
ie.
"Genereation 90s had the best video games!" (those born in 1990-1999).
"The 70s and 80s had the best music!" (Those born in 1970-1979 and 1980-1989).
Beyond 2000 are referred as 2000s, 2010s...etc
See, easy, Mindblownly simple! Basic intervals in math.
Why these crazy nonsensial terms became so popular in every damn article in english out there? It is like an obsession to be used now in the entire internet.
Because they're defining generational cohorts more by shared experiences than decades. 1989 and 1990 births share more common experiences than either of them shares with a 1981 birth, for example.
Your post is very smug, but that's not the same as it containing the only correct understanding.
Sounds like too arbitrary, what's there a 1981 that had experienced that a 1989 didn't?
Why a 1965 shares more experience with a 1980 more than 1989 vs 1981 ? surely a 10 years breacket generation would have more shared experiences than a 15/18 years brackets.
Gen X is the gulf between the end of the baby boom and their kids, as described in books like
Boom, Bust and Echo. That's their shared experience, whereas boomers and their kids both experienced being large cohorts.
Meanwhile, for shared experiences, a kid born in 1989 probably used the internet as a child, a kid born in 1981 almost certainly didn't. A kid born in 1989 watched 9/11 happen while at school, a kid born in 1981 was at work while it happened.
They're no more arbitrary than decades, and are widely talked about to the point most people in the cultures that use them are familiar with the approximate boundaries even if there's room for debate over exactly where to draw those lines.
Decades have the same problem though, the '90s ended on September 11th, 2001; the '80s began in 1979. If the worst case scenario for Y2K unfolded the '90s would have ended at midnight on January 1st, 2000.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.