ruennsheng wrote:
Anyway US needs to reduce its military expenditures to just protect its own soils... Not policing the whole world.
I largely agree with that, but the OP needs to understand much about how the economy really works.
A sustainable economy has to do with supply and demand. Before the introduction of credit, people basically paid cash (bought only what they had the money for) or got a loan to buy something (bought only what they could afford to pay back).
Bankruptcy was a harsh stigma. "Easy credit" didn't exist. Real money (currency backed by actual value of gold and silver) was the norm.
We went to fiat currency (as did the rest of the "civilized" world). They created credit (most all credit dealers don't have even 1/10 in real assets backing the amount they are permitted to extend. Bankruptcy has been largely negated because of how bad the economy has become.
With an insolvent dollar, outsourcing jobs, importing cheap, replaceable goods, etc. the only way the economy looks to be in good shape is by keeping the money flowing. It used to be our economic might was measured in terms of exports vs. imports. Now, we don't look to that anymore...they only talk about "consumer confidence" (or the willingness of people to spend money). The economy has technically already died, but so long as the money keeps flowing and people can keep buying stuff, the ILLUSION of prosperity lives. If people went back to spending within their means, the economy would collapse overnight, and that's part of why the house of cards is coming down now. With lots of people losing jobs, more and more consumers are out of the market...buying only needs and very few wants. As the impact grows, more people start living within their means, and the foundation for keeping the illusion of prosperity alive erodes further.
This should have happened 30 years ago. It's happening now, and the impact of the change will be more severe because of how dependent our society became on easy credit and the false illusion of prosperity from unsustainable economic policies.
As a nation, America may use more resources than other nations, but we also use them more efficiently than other nations, so it's a trade off. It's like criticizing America for being a major polluter but ignoring how much production that represents per unit versus a nation with less pollution but due to inefficiency and no environmental policy pollutes a lot more per unit of production than the USA.