Global Warming Denier Gets Punked
Swarthmore students award Patrick Michaels a Certificate of Excellence in Corporate Climatology for his efforts to derail green technology in favor for the oil industry - who happen to fund 40% percent of his research.
For the full story: http://www.polluterwatch.com/blog/swart ... otos-video

For the full story: http://www.polluterwatch.com/blog/swart ... otos-video

_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
Do you remember that the charges were dismissed?
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
Do you remember that the charges were dismissed?
Sadly that isn't going to matter to those not educated enough to understand the science. Why bother and learn the science yourself when it's so much easier to just take the word of partison political pundits and politicians?
Also, just to set the record, I'm not just bashing conservatives here. I also don't care for liberals who claim to be climate experts because they watched "An Inconvenient Truth" either.
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
Do you remember that the charges were dismissed?
Sadly that isn't going to matter to those not educated enough to understand the science. Why bother and learn the science yourself when it's so much easier to just take the word of partison political pundits and politicians?
Also, just to set the record, I'm not just bashing conservatives here. I also don't care for liberals who claim to be climate experts because they watched "An Inconvenient Truth" either.
I agree I hate those types. The real problem is the right & left wing media. The right wing media takes things out of context in a negative (denialist) light, while the left wing media does it in a positive (alarmist) light. The truth is much more complicated and most of the research is tl;dr for most people yet they are still willing to make bold assertions supporting or denying it
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
Do you remember that the charges were dismissed?
Sadly that isn't going to matter to those not educated enough to understand the science. Why bother and learn the science yourself when it's so much easier to just take the word of partison political pundits and politicians?
Also, just to set the record, I'm not just bashing conservatives here. I also don't care for liberals who claim to be climate experts because they watched "An Inconvenient Truth" either.
I agree I hate those types. The real problem is the right & left wing media. The right wing media takes things out of context in a negative (denialist) light, while the left wing media does it in a positive (alarmist) light. The truth is much more complicated and most of the research is tl;dr for most people yet they are still willing to make bold assertions supporting or denying it
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
That's because that never happened.
_________________
.
The other side are total liars.
Yes, the vast majority of the scientific community are total liars out to get you. Run! Run away!
Do you remember climategate?
That's because that never happened.
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
I don't like the term "denier". It deliberately draws connotation with holocaust deniers. Global Warming Skeptics, Evolution Skeptics, Round Earth Skeptics, not deniers...
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
I differentiate between GW denialists and GW skeptics on the basis of the tactics they employ or their actual level of knowledge. Everyone who is supporting the notion should still be skeptical, likewise those opposed. Thus I lump alarmists and denialists into the same category of 'profiteering'
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Denier is the only accurate term you can use for people actually thinking they can downright deny the climate change itself. Feel free to argue about the causes (even though I think the probability it is green house gases is very large) and about how to fix (I personally do not believe the fairy tale that just reducing emissions will magically make the problem go away, would rather they think of something like a giant fan, it is crazy but more realistic) but to say that there is no change is plain denial and the level of irrationality in that is similar to that of holocaust deniers in that they are attempting to deny truth because it doesn't fit their agenda.
_________________
.
Also, just to set the record, I'm not just bashing conservatives here. I also don't care for liberals who claim to be climate experts because they watched "An Inconvenient Truth" either.
I agree I hate those types. The real problem is the right & left wing media. The right wing media takes things out of context in a negative (denialist) light, while the left wing media does it in a positive (alarmist) light. The truth is much more complicated and most of the research is tl;dr for most people yet they are still willing to make bold assertions supporting or denying it
I disapprove of the false equivalencies being drawn in these posts. It is not equivalent. One side is almost certainly actually correct, and one side is a whore to corporate interests that wish to short-sightedly pursue profits at the expense of the entire f*****g planet.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
I differentiate between GW denialists and GW skeptics on the basis of the tactics they employ or their actual level of knowledge. Everyone who is supporting the notion should still be skeptical, likewise those opposed. Thus I lump alarmists and denialists into the same category of 'profiteering'
I have personally worked with some of the data and it is very obvious that there is a warming trend (from many many different sources I might add, not just from thermometers at airports). Claims the trend can be explained by moved thermometers, by the urban heat island effect, claims that the majority of scientists thought the climate was cooling in the 70's, etc, etc... all that stuff that gets repeated ad-nauseum I would lump firmly into the denialism camp. Worst are the claims that scientists are deliberately lying and conspiring. It is irrational to keep repeating baloney that has been shown wrong over and over again and the people who keep repeating the garbage are uncannily similar to creationists in their modus operandi. There's skepticism and then there's just plain idiocy.
