Page 1 of 4 [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Should male and female convicts be imprisoned together?
Yes 10%  10%  [ 3 ]
No 53%  53%  [ 16 ]
I need a snack 37%  37%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 30

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 1:25 pm

So far, women have been fully integrated into the military and police forces. Previously, a lot of people thought that this could never happen.

One huge bastion of gender discrimination continues: gender-specific prisons. Women and men are confined in separate facilities.

I don't think that Feminists have started taking aim at this issue, possibly because they don't perceive any particular advantage (for women) of housing female convicts together with male convicts.

So, what do you think? Should this last bastion of gender-discrimination continue in perpetuity? Or, is it time to imprison men and women together, based upon the radical notion that women are people, too?



AutisticMillionaire
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2013
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 174
Location: Montana

08 Dec 2013, 1:31 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
So far, women have been fully integrated into the military and police forces. Previously, a lot of people thought that this could never happen.

One huge bastion of gender discrimination continues: gender-specific prisons. Women and men are confined in separate facilities.

I don't think that Feminists have started taking aim at this issue, possibly because they don't perceive any particular advantage (for women) of housing female convicts together with male convicts.

So, what do you think? Should this last bastion of gender-discrimination continue in perpetuity? Or, is it time to imprison men and women together, based upon the radical notion that women are people, too?


Ok, obviously your being coy, you know that would make prison prison a rape farm...so your not saying that.

Are you saying women don't belong in the military because of the rising rape statistics? What's your point... I get the feeling your up to no-good....


_________________
"I don't care half so much about making money as I do about making my point, and coming out ahead."

"What do I care about law? Ain't I got the power?"
Cornelius Vanderbilt


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

08 Dec 2013, 2:08 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Or, is it time to imprison men and women together, based upon the radical notion that women are people, too?


Muahahahahahahaha!



TheGoggles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060

08 Dec 2013, 2:22 pm

Ow, I cut myself on this edgy thread.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 6:22 pm

AutisticMillionaire wrote:
Ok, obviously your being coy, you know that would make prison prison a rape farm...so your not saying that.


Prisons are already rape farms. But, perhaps if a coed prison included a bunch of Feminist convicts who went on a "Sex in NOT an Entitlement!" campaign, then even homosexual rape would be down.

AutisticMillionaire wrote:
Are you saying women don't belong in the military because of the rising rape statistics? What's your point...


Not at all. I'm just saying that women are fully integrated with men in all aspects of society, including the military, but with the glaring exception of prisons. Why should this be? Any prison will have both male and female guards and employees, but single-gender inmates. Is it time to desegregate the prisons?

AutisticMillionaire wrote:
I get the feeling your up to no-good....


:twisted:



American
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 285

08 Dec 2013, 6:54 pm

What exactly would a "coed" prison be? Co-ed means co-educational and the term applies to learning institutions, not penal institutions.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

08 Dec 2013, 6:56 pm

This is so funny. Most would say people serving time for crime should not get any fringe benefits, and this includes ogling the opposite sex.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 71
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

08 Dec 2013, 7:09 pm

No, they should not be coed because there are guys like AP in the world who get excited by the idea of women behind bars, and it would create an incentive for such guys to commit felonies because they would actively seek incarceration.



Last edited by naturalplastic on 08 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

thewhitrbbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,124

08 Dec 2013, 7:19 pm

Who's going to pay for the babies?



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 8:19 pm

American wrote:
What exactly would a "coed" prison be? Co-ed means co-educational and the term applies to learning institutions, not penal institutions.


Well, another word for prison is "Correctional Facility", where criminal behavior is supposedly "corrected." This presumably involves some sort of educational effort.

Some universities have co-ed dormitories, and learning doesn't necessarily take place in the dorms, although a certain amount of knowing might.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
No they should no be coed because there are guys like AP in the world who get excited by the idea of women behind bars, and it would create an incentive for such guys to commit felonies because they would actively seek incarceration.


Image



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm

Since the military has been brought up:

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/patrick-j-b ... r-feminism

Patrick Buchanan wrote:
...The Pentagon unveiled plans Tuesday for fully integrating women into front-line and special combat roles, including elite forces such as Army Rangers and Navy SEALs."

So ran the lead on the CNN story. And why are we doing this? Did the young officers leading troops in battle in Afghanistan and Iraq, returning with casualties, say they needed women to enhance the fighting efficiency of their combat units and the survival rate of their soldiers? Did men from the 101st and 82nd airborne, the Marines, the SEALs and Delta Force petition the Joint Chiefs to put women alongside them in future engagements to make them an even superior force?

No. This decision to put women in combat represents a capitulation of the military brass, a surrender to the spirit of our age, the Pentagon's salute to feminist ideology.

This is not a decision at which soldiers arrived when they studied after-action reports, but the product of an ideology that contradicts human nature, human experience and human history, and declares as dogma that women are just as good at soldiering as men.

But if this were true, rather than merely asserted, would it have taken mankind the thousands of years from Thermopylae to discover it?

...Sending women into combat on equal terms seems also to violate common sense. When they reach maturity, men are bigger, stronger, more aggressive. Thus they commit many times the number of violent crimes and outnumber women in prisons 10 to 1....

...Is it a coincidence that every massacre discussed in our gun debate — from the Texas Tower to the Long Island Railroad, from Columbine to Ft. Hood, from Virginia Tech to Tucson, from Aurora to Newtown — was the work of a crazed male?

...Consider our own history. Would any U.S. admiral say that in any of America's great naval battles — Mobile Bay, Manila Bay, Midway, the Coral Sea — we would done better with some women manning the guns? In the revolutionary and civil wars, World Wars I and II, Korea and Vietnam, women were not in combat. Was it invidious discrimination of which we should all be ashamed that women were not fighting alongside the men at Gettysburg, in the Argonne, at Normandy or with "Chesty" Puller's Marines in the retreat from the Chosin Reservoir?...

...Carry this feminist-egalitarian ideology to its logical conclusion, and half of those storming the Omaha and Utah beaches should have been girls and women. Is this not an absurdity?....

...We have had Navy ships become "love boats," with female sailors returning pregnant. ...

An estimated 26,000 personnel of the armed forces were sexually assaulted in 2011, up from 19,000 in 2010. Obama and the Congress are understandably outraged. Such assaults are appalling. But is not the practice of forcing young men and women together in close quarters a contributory factor here? ....


Well, wouldn't sexually-integrated prisons, and a move to try to make certain that the number of female and male convicts was equal, also represent a fitting salute to Feminist ideology? We surely don't want glaring gender inequality, do we?



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

08 Dec 2013, 9:15 pm

If that happens they should both be spayed and neutered like how they spay and neuter dogs and cats at the pound. That way we dont have to pay for their litter.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


appletheclown
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,378
Location: Soul Society

08 Dec 2013, 9:16 pm

Women have a right to die protecting the country they love, same as you me and everyone else.


_________________
comedic burp


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Dec 2013, 10:03 pm

appletheclown wrote:
Women have a right to die protecting the country they love, same as you me and everyone else.


I'll agree with you there, and with the goal of 50% of combat personnel being female.

But, the prison population should also be 50% female, and prisons should be fully integrated. To suggest otherwise is sexist.



Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: USA

08 Dec 2013, 10:07 pm

It's not sexist when most criminals are heterosexual and many have no qualms against raping someone. We do not need them breeding when they are to be punished.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html