ollychan wrote:
america has no art. lets make it happen.
Boris Groys, russian-german art theorist, put it in a way I think is correct: an artist is someone who devotes his life to cultivating his image.
Art has ceased to be about the production of art objects and has become about the production of art personalities.
He thinks Joseph Beyus was particularly good at this, but I think Andy Warhol and his it-girls are also to be credited.
If Groys is correct, then America has its art-form: being famous.
Robert Pirsig thought so, too, in Laila, the follow-up to Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance.
To be honest: no place but the US has people like the Kardashians.
We can argue about what the Kardashians produce, nay, are, is an indicator for the aesthetic sensibilities of our time...
There is hiwever another art form the US has invented and perfected: advertising.
If art of the 19th and early 20th century was about ideas and truths beyond one's own existence, about values to shape identities around, then advertising has taken this place.
What are orthodox icons but jesus fanart?
So, in my opinion, there's American art, and it's propagating the values of American civilization - mainly, individualism and the freedom to make one's image into and artwotk, and consumerism - the freedom to pick one's identity through consumption choices.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.