The_Walrus wrote:
I think it is a mistake to bring economics into it.
As a matter of fact, Hitler was our opponent in WWII, with Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan also ending up on the losing side. But Stalin was monstrously evil and responsible for multiple genocides, including Holodomor. He was also an imperialist who built an extensive empire outside Russia, and like Hitler he engaged in mass murder of his political opponents. My view is that they are both above the threshold of monstrous evil where it’s in poor taste to say that either was “less bad” than the other.
It is true that many right-wing people in the 30s advocated allying with Hitler and allowing him to go to war with Stalin because fascism was less of a threat than communism.
I didn't mean to make things about economics per se. I don't really see nationalists justify genocide for economic reasons. Stalin's body count seems to have been mostly held back by the fact that it was a means to an end--not the end itself. Hitler's machinations were all ultimately in pursuit of the genocide of Europe's Jews, Roma, Slavs, etc. for the supposed benefit of the German race. Stalin's were in pursuit of power for himself and the USSR--regardless of who had to die or have their rights trampled on. Stalin's persecution of non-Russians didn't come from a belief in their superiority (at least not over him since he was Georgian) so much as it came from a recognition that maintaining support from the Russian majority was necessary for Stalin to do all the evil things he wanted the USSR to do. The Ukrainians were yet again an easy target for the Russian state looking for cheap grain.
But yeah, this is splitting hairs of me to say "well, Hitler was doing his genocide for worse reasons".
_________________
Diagnoses: AS, Depression, General & Social Anxiety
I guess I just wasn't made for these times.
- Brian Wilson
Δυνατὰ δὲ οἱ προύχοντες πράσσουσι καὶ οἱ ἀσθενεῖς ξυγχωροῦσιν.
Those with power do what their power permits, and the weak can only acquiesce.
- Thucydides
Conservatism discourages thought, discussion, consensus, empathy, and hope.