Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
12 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm
12 Sep 2011, 6:16 pm
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Not a "feeling" Rather substantial saving in wages paid. By the way, most employees are hired on an "at will" basis. They are not guaranteed their employment long term.
ruveyn
ruveyn
I would suggest that most jurisdictions in the US and Canada have employment standards legislation that prohibit employers from dismissing them without cause (or for unreasonable cause). Certainly in Canada if an employer purported to lay an employee off on the basis of economic necessity and turned around to hire an employee to perform the same work for a lower salary, that employer would find itself on the wrong end of a wrongful dismissal action. I suspect the same would be true in any state in the United States.
I wish that you were right in the us there are several states mostly in the west and south were employment is
"at will" meaning the boss does not need a reason to fire a person although racial/sex discrimination is still illegal.
strangely this states correspond quite strongly with the "right to work" anti-union states.
Their is some truth in what you say but the south has been hammered with losts of jobs and we are anti union because we dont support unions we just never have most people in the south would rather be unenployed then to join a union
That's because southerners like to lose. (bin doing it fo years)
Be strong and be Wrong.
But wait your from North Carolina that's hardly southern.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
12 Sep 2011, 6:34 pm
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Not a "feeling" Rather substantial saving in wages paid. By the way, most employees are hired on an "at will" basis. They are not guaranteed their employment long term.
ruveyn
ruveyn
I would suggest that most jurisdictions in the US and Canada have employment standards legislation that prohibit employers from dismissing them without cause (or for unreasonable cause). Certainly in Canada if an employer purported to lay an employee off on the basis of economic necessity and turned around to hire an employee to perform the same work for a lower salary, that employer would find itself on the wrong end of a wrongful dismissal action. I suspect the same would be true in any state in the United States.
I wish that you were right in the us there are several states mostly in the west and south were employment is
"at will" meaning the boss does not need a reason to fire a person although racial/sex discrimination is still illegal.
strangely this states correspond quite strongly with the "right to work" anti-union states.
Their is some truth in what you say but the south has been hammered with losts of jobs and we are anti union because we dont support unions we just never have most people in the south would rather be unenployed then to join a union
That's because southerners like to lose. (bin doing it fo years)
Be strong and be Wrong.
But wait your from North Carolina that's hardly southern.
North Carolina is one of the original sotuerner states and was a memmber of the confederacy.
If people from the south all left america how will the rest of the country win the two wars we are in?
Their are more southerners in the military then their are people from the west or the north.
Hell the south is the war horse of america with out us do you really think we would have much of a military?
12 Sep 2011, 7:31 pm
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Not a "feeling" Rather substantial saving in wages paid. By the way, most employees are hired on an "at will" basis. They are not guaranteed their employment long term.
ruveyn
ruveyn
I would suggest that most jurisdictions in the US and Canada have employment standards legislation that prohibit employers from dismissing them without cause (or for unreasonable cause). Certainly in Canada if an employer purported to lay an employee off on the basis of economic necessity and turned around to hire an employee to perform the same work for a lower salary, that employer would find itself on the wrong end of a wrongful dismissal action. I suspect the same would be true in any state in the United States.
I wish that you were right in the us there are several states mostly in the west and south were employment is
"at will" meaning the boss does not need a reason to fire a person although racial/sex discrimination is still illegal.
strangely this states correspond quite strongly with the "right to work" anti-union states.
Their is some truth in what you say but the south has been hammered with losts of jobs and we are anti union because we dont support unions we just never have most people in the south would rather be unenployed then to join a union
That's because southerners like to lose. (bin doing it fo years)
Be strong and be Wrong.
But wait your from North Carolina that's hardly southern.
(1) North Carolina is one of the original sotuerner states and was a memmber of the confederacy.
(2) If people from the south all left america how will the rest of the country win the two wars we are in?
(3) Their are more southerners in the military then their are people from the west or the north.
(4) Hell the south is the war horse of america with out us do you really think we would have much of a military?
(1) NC was the last state to join the Traitors and the first state to wise up.
(2) Oh to dream, If the south was not a part of america we would not be in 2 wars or so many morons in congress.
(3) the southern Camouflaged-welfare-queens need to get real jobs and stop mooching off of productive folks.
(4) Maybe we should stop having so many wars and just shoot the Nag.
12 Sep 2011, 7:48 pm
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 pm
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Not a "feeling" Rather substantial saving in wages paid. By the way, most employees are hired on an "at will" basis. They are not guaranteed their employment long term.
ruveyn
ruveyn
I would suggest that most jurisdictions in the US and Canada have employment standards legislation that prohibit employers from dismissing them without cause (or for unreasonable cause). Certainly in Canada if an employer purported to lay an employee off on the basis of economic necessity and turned around to hire an employee to perform the same work for a lower salary, that employer would find itself on the wrong end of a wrongful dismissal action. I suspect the same would be true in any state in the United States.
I wish that you were right in the us there are several states mostly in the west and south were employment is
"at will" meaning the boss does not need a reason to fire a person although racial/sex discrimination is still illegal.
strangely this states correspond quite strongly with the "right to work" anti-union states.
Their is some truth in what you say but the south has been hammered with losts of jobs and we are anti union because we dont support unions we just never have most people in the south would rather be unenployed then to join a union
That's because southerners like to lose. (bin doing it fo years)
Be strong and be Wrong.
But wait your from North Carolina that's hardly southern.
(1) North Carolina is one of the original sotuerner states and was a memmber of the confederacy.
(2) If people from the south all left america how will the rest of the country win the two wars we are in?
(3) Their are more southerners in the military then their are people from the west or the north.
(4) Hell the south is the war horse of america with out us do you really think we would have much of a military?
(1) NC was the last state to join the Traitors and the first state to wise up.
(2) Oh to dream, If the south was not a part of america we would not be in 2 wars or so many morons in congress.
(3) the southern Camouflaged-welfare-queens need to get real jobs and stop mooching off of productive folks.
(4) Maybe we should stop having so many wars and just shoot the Nag.
Yet it was the south that was in favor of the civil rights bill being passed when so many democrats voted against it hmm the Irony plus the terrorists attacked the north not the south so yall would still be in a war not the south we where the ones who where in favor of the war in Iraq not the north or the west.
BTW all southerners do is work we are the ones against people mooching off the productive folks its called owning farms ect even if we dont have a job we still work and find ways to make money
And if I do remmber the north at least in some parts owned slaves ohh the irony plus its always liberals that bring up past history in a arugement slavery has happenend every where not just america pleas dont live in the past join us here in the present btw Barack Obama won a few southener states during his election campaign not to mention that I voted for him
And I am a huge supporter of civil rights its the younger generation in the south thats looking for change the older generation will not be here forever thats where the problem lies but their are plenty of bigots in the north and west ect so its a double standard
The south secede yes but it had a lot more to do with it then just slavery my friend call us tratiors but we fought for what we belived in the civil rights movement started in the south a lot of aftrican americans still choose to live here even after the civil war they still stayed
12 Sep 2011, 8:43 pm
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
Joker wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
visagrunt wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Not a "feeling" Rather substantial saving in wages paid. By the way, most employees are hired on an "at will" basis. They are not guaranteed their employment long term.
ruveyn
ruveyn
I would suggest that most jurisdictions in the US and Canada have employment standards legislation that prohibit employers from dismissing them without cause (or for unreasonable cause). Certainly in Canada if an employer purported to lay an employee off on the basis of economic necessity and turned around to hire an employee to perform the same work for a lower salary, that employer would find itself on the wrong end of a wrongful dismissal action. I suspect the same would be true in any state in the United States.
I wish that you were right in the us there are several states mostly in the west and south were employment is
"at will" meaning the boss does not need a reason to fire a person although racial/sex discrimination is still illegal.
strangely this states correspond quite strongly with the "right to work" anti-union states.
Their is some truth in what you say but the south has been hammered with losts of jobs and we are anti union because we dont support unions we just never have most people in the south would rather be unenployed then to join a union
That's because southerners like to lose. (bin doing it fo years)
Be strong and be Wrong.
But wait your from North Carolina that's hardly southern.
(1) North Carolina is one of the original sotuerner states and was a memmber of the confederacy.
(2) If people from the south all left america how will the rest of the country win the two wars we are in?
(3) Their are more southerners in the military then their are people from the west or the north.
(4) Hell the south is the war horse of america with out us do you really think we would have much of a military?
(1) NC was the last state to join the Traitors and the first state to wise up.
(2) Oh to dream, If the south was not a part of america we would not be in 2 wars or so many morons in congress.
(3) the southern Camouflaged-welfare-queens need to get real jobs and stop mooching off of productive folks.
(4) Maybe we should stop having so many wars and just shoot the Nag.
(5) Yet it was the south that was in favor of the civil rights bill being passed when so many democrats voted against it hmm the Irony plus the terrorists attacked the north not the south so yall would still be in a war not the south we where the ones who where in favor of the war in Iraq not the north or the west.
(6) BTW all southerners do is work we are the ones against people mooching off the productive folks its called owning farms ect even if we dont have a job we still work and find ways to make money
(7) And if I do remmber the north at least in some parts owned slaves ohh the irony plus its always liberals that bring up past history in a arugement slavery has happenend every where not just america pleas dont live in the past join us here in the present btw Barack Obama won a few southener states during his election campaign not to mention that I voted for him
(8) And I am a huge supporter of civil rights its the younger generation in the south thats looking for change the older generation will not be here forever thats where the problem lies but their are plenty of bigots in the north and west ect so its a double standard
(9)The south secede yes but it had a lot more to do with it then just slavery my friend call us tratiors but we fought for what we belived in the civil rights movement started in the south a lot of aftrican americans still choose to live here even after the civil war they still stayed
5. profoundly untrue everheard of a Dixiecrat?
6. wrong again Southern states are net consumers of tax money.
7. He won North Carolina which is like I said hardly southern.
I am from the west and never feel a need to defend yankees
(NC is where I live now by the way)
I have lived in Mississippi and Louisiana. North Carolina is a southern themed amusement park.
8. Good on ya.
9. Traitors usually fight for what they believe in you want a medal?
