[POLL] Where are you politically?
Mummy_of_Peanut
Veteran

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,564
Location: Bonnie Scotland
_________________
"We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all we need to make us really happy is something to be enthusiatic about." Charles Kingsley
In Europe we would call social engineering types social liberals, greenies, socialists, social democrats, authoritarian conservatives and other general nasties.
I think classical liberalism and radicalism is a decent approximation of your ideology. Classical liberalism might suit you best? It depends on how much you want the state to be able to interfere in another's life. But yeah, classical liberalism is a decent descriptor. Do you think that the state "should" have an increasing role in people's lives or do you think that people are generally better off without it wherever possible? Would you favour privatisaiton of health care (something that is being looked at in Britain) if it was genuinely free-market and not corporatist and bureaucratic?
Libertarianism clearly doesn't suit you. Social liberalism doesn't suit you either, because social liberals are the very nanny statists (probably like what you think of when you think "liberals") you decry.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Oh, but those conservatives would tell you that inequality encourages people to reach for the stars!

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
- Since it is on a large scale, it requires the Government to be more centralized, making the Government more monolithic and less divided
- Because it's in the name of some arbitrary ideological construct, there's no specific or measurable way to see where it's at or where it's going.
The reason they like vagueness isn't just to cover their own asses, but because emotional appeal fills the void that vagueness leaves behind.
Last edited by AceOfSpades on 14 Mar 2012, 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kraichgauer
Veteran

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,246
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The reason they like vagueness isn't just to cover their own asses, but because emotional appeal fills the void that vagueness leaves behind.
But we're not autonomous within society. We each need the rest of society to survive, and in turn, others are dependent on us. That's not any sort of tyranny of the masses, but simply the way the nature of human society has always worked. The notion of a society consisting entirely of autonomous individuals only existed in make-believe land.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
LunaticOnTheGrass
Snowy Owl

Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 136
Location: Under the Sun, in tune.
You're making the typical rookie mistake, thinking that American politicians want a happy society.

Issues and problems are exploitable, meaning that the more problems there are, the more solutions that can be formulated to provide slow, painful reprieve.
This, of course, will garner a profit. While we're frittering away over problems like "Should women have control over their own bodies and have the same rights as men", our elected representatives are rolling in money that I know I'll never see in my lifetime.
...And yes, Socialism is seriously an accusation 'round here in 'Murica. The word "Liberal" is taboo; sometimes the occasional candidate settles for the tag of "Progressive". Most of the time, though, it's all about out-Americaning the opponent while all attempting to claim that they, not the others, are the one chosen by the world's biggest collective imaginary friend.
I'd like to see an American presidential candidate who confidently strides up to the podium and says, "I'm a liberal socialist, vote for me!"
Wouldn't that knock the wind out of a lot of sails? The sails of those people who like to accuse everyone of being liberals and socialists, I mean. What could they say if someone would just own it and represent it?
This poll does not take into account that some of the choices can overlap.
That said, I vote Republican solely because the U.S. is a 2-party state and I agree more with them than I do the Democrats, but I actually tend to be on the border between libertarian/anarchist.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
MONKEY
Veteran

Joined: 3 Jan 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,896
Location: Stoke, England (sometimes :P)
Politics can be confusing and pretty much all parties/leanings etc only seem to work on paper if that. Though in general I would say I'm more on the left so I voted liberal. I agree with an earlier poster about things being sorted on a case by case basis, I'm very relativist in that way and each issue should be looked at individually and not have one approach covering all. Like a crime case and things like that.
I'm also for the legalisation of recreational drugs, but regulated so they can only be purchased from chemists and they can keep track of how often a purchaser buys them to avoid dependence and addiction.
And the police are a bit rubbish because they overreact to petty things like arguments in the street and thefts of chewing gums when there's better things they could be doing, and prison should be for people who are dangerous and their crimes have a direct, hurt victim (burlgary, murder, rape, severe assault etc). With other petty stuff house arrests, huge fines and community service will suffice so the prisons aren't over crowded by people that don't need locking away.
I also hate large scale war and the military is a pointlessly dangerous job to go into and if the country isn't in direct threat there doesn't need to be one. I hate when someone joins the army because they are risking an avoidable death and they should be safe.
And I think age of sexual consent laws need to be a bit more relaxed, Canada have got it right in this respect. So teenagers aren't patronised and an 18 year old with a sexually active 15 year old girlfriend/boyfriend isn't demonised as a pedo rapist. It's not that black and white.
Also some amount of benefits and welfare are needed and shouldn't be cut so drastically.
I often get chastised for my leanings and beliefs because it's too left, they often get dismissed as stupid or immature, especially when it comes to the military and the law. My mum says I "don't understand" (that's her way of dismissing my thoughts). Ah well.
_________________
What film do atheists watch on Christmas?
Coincidence on 34th street.
Quite often, although it's illegal, action isn't taken if there are no signs of abuse and no-one complains. If the older partner is 20 or above though at with a partner at 15, it is seen as exploitative and if it's found out about, action tends to be taken.
Last edited by Tequila on 14 Mar 2012, 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We need to have a military in order to defend all our territory. Otherwise, I generally agree in that we should stay out of foreign conflicts.
We need to have a military in order to defend all our territory. Otherwise, I generally agree in that we should stay out of foreign conflicts.
This.
Having no standing military is a short sighted idea.
_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.
All over the map. I advocate government that takes care of its citizens and has strong laws. I prefer a society that prizes order, respects the laws of man and respects those in positions of authority (providing those authority figures don't do anything to betray the trust of the people).
In other words, do whatever you want as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others, and don't victimize your fellow man to make money.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Yup. If we didn't have a military, the Falkland Islands would be Argentine in minutes.
... the problem being?
I don't disagree with the need for a military in general, however. It is sadly a necessity because even though one may commit oneself not to attack others, that does not mean others will do the same. In fact, it means they probably will attack.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
(poll) tie breaker what should my new pfp be? |
17 May 2025, 1:16 pm |
Is this poll useless? |
06 May 2025, 9:52 am |
ENA: Dream BBQ poll. |
21 May 2025, 12:16 pm |
(poll) is dukenukem 3d sexist? |
24 May 2025, 9:22 pm |