ruveyn wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Who is offended?
You know that is a very good question. If some tobacco product vendor came out with "Sheeny-Kike" cigarettes, I would have been offended. Obviously I would not have bought the product and I would have bad mouthed it at ever opportunity. But still, the purpose of the brand name was to sell the tobacco products to anti-semites, not to insult me.
ruveyn
If it came out in this day and age it would have been designed to offend, likely enough. I don't know if "k*e" was ever acceptable, but "n****r" and "Negro" were at some point, so when looking at advertising (or literature, for that matter) it is important to take the time period into account. Were the items at this time designed to offend, or to take advantage of literary (include film and television in this besides written work for sake of convenience) stereotypes considered familiar, amusing or trendy to those at the time, in order to boost sales? Remember that black-face comedy was pretty accepted for a long time. I wonder what people will think when looking at our time's advertising and cultural slang 60 years from now?
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do