If men were oppressed
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
true. Reversing the roles wouldn't reduce the number of victims, only change who the victims are; nothing substantial would actually change. To quote (iirc) Germaine Greer, ' The opposite of patriarchy is not matriarchy, but fraternity.'
thomas81
Veteran

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
LKL wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
true. Reversing the roles wouldn't reduce the number of victims, only change who the victims are; nothing substantial would actually change. To quote (iirc) Germaine Greer, ' The opposite of patriarchy is not matriarchy, but fraternity.'The only fraternity that patriarchs and MRA's seem interested in is one where men still hold most of the cards.
thomas81
Veteran

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
appletheclown wrote:
More revolutionist bs.
Fix what you have before you muck it up.
Fix what you have before you muck it up.
there comes a point when you have to accept what you have is unrepairable.
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
There's an antidote to this fear and vilification, Otaku. Men just become feminists then there's nothing to fear or vilify. Sounds like a good idea?
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
There's an antidote to this fear and vilification, Otaku. Men just become feminists then there's nothing to fear or vilify. Sounds like a good idea?
Good, woman loving men shouldn't have to adhere to a label just because some person says so.
How bout you just like it when men treat you the way you want them to, and I treat you like that as well.
I'll never be a feminist, that doesn't mean I don't love women either.
_________________
comedic burp
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
There's an antidote to this fear and vilification, Otaku. Men just become feminists then there's nothing to fear or vilify. Sounds like a good idea?
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
AspieOtaku wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
There's an antidote to this fear and vilification, Otaku. Men just become feminists then there's nothing to fear or vilify. Sounds like a good idea?
Exactly what I want to write but cannot find the words! I feel the same way. I am an idealist in that respect, rather than pessimist.
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
If men were oppressed on a grand scale it would be no different than how women are oppressed. Due to patriarchy and rape culture women continue to be oppressed raped and treated as second class citizens while at the same time encourages the vilification and fear of men.
There's an antidote to this fear and vilification, Otaku. Men just become feminists then there's nothing to fear or vilify. Sounds like a good idea?
Exactly what I want to write but cannot find the words! I feel the same way. I am an idealist in that respect, rather than pessimist.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
appletheclown wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
What else, do you think i go around with a bowler hat and an umbrella while i sip a cup of tea?
Sounds like fun. Might go good with brass round frame glasses, and a brown chaulk stripe suit set.
Add on black leather gloves, and an Aston Martin, I'd look stylin'!

_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
thomas81 wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
Aside from rape men make up the vast majority of victims of violent crime. They also make up the majority of prison inmates. And the homeless. They work more dangerous jobs and are exponentially more likely to die on those jobs. And they commit suicide four times more often than women.
.
Virtually all of these issues you bring up are symptomatic of patriarchy.
Its patriarchy that insists that men maintain a facade of being tough, of acting in a aggressive tribal manner and not being sensitive or open about their mental health and emotional problems.
You can't blame women or the gains of feminism for any of these things.
The reason fewer women commit suicide, end up homeless or end up in prison is because women are more likely than men to seek help from others when they are in crisis. Women are less likely to become violent or turn to criminality. The very fact that men remain silent and bottle up their problems out of pride is what confounds the problem for men who do seek help, because there isnt the resource or advocacy infrastructure for men when they do look for aid.
So in conclusion yes, men DO collectively bring their own problems upon themselves.
FALSE! In reality it is women who raise the children and thus socialize children. If the children grow up to be abusive adults we don't have to look much farther than the parents of said adults. The philosopher Stefan Molyneux has some excellent videos on the subject. I suggest you watch them.
Iammyowngod wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
mds_02 wrote:
Aside from rape men make up the vast majority of victims of violent crime. They also make up the majority of prison inmates. And the homeless. They work more dangerous jobs and are exponentially more likely to die on those jobs. And they commit suicide four times more often than women.
.
Virtually all of these issues you bring up are symptomatic of patriarchy.
Its patriarchy that insists that men maintain a facade of being tough, of acting in a aggressive tribal manner and not being sensitive or open about their mental health and emotional problems.
You can't blame women or the gains of feminism for any of these things.
The reason fewer women commit suicide, end up homeless or end up in prison is because women are more likely than men to seek help from others when they are in crisis. Women are less likely to become violent or turn to criminality. The very fact that men remain silent and bottle up their problems out of pride is what confounds the problem for men who do seek help, because there isnt the resource or advocacy infrastructure for men when they do look for aid.
So in conclusion yes, men DO collectively bring their own problems upon themselves.
FALSE! In reality it is women who raise the children and thus socialize children. If the children grow up to be abusive adults we don't have to look much farther than the parents of said adults. The philosopher Stefan Molyneux has some excellent videos on the subject. I suggest you watch them.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
thomas81
Veteran

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
AspieOtaku wrote:
The irony is he supports radical Islam so thats a shot in the foot right there!
You're a liar, and a spectacularly bad one. When did i say I support radical Islam?
I support legitimate nationalist struggles against larger oppressive powers, that is something completely different if you're referring to the Palestinians.
I would support Bashir Assad (a seculiarist) before I support the Syrian Islamist rebels.
thomas81
Veteran

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
Iammyowngod wrote:
FALSE! In reality it is women who raise the children and thus socialize children. If the children grow up to be abusive adults we don't have to look much farther than the parents of said adults. The philosopher Stefan Molyneux has some excellent videos on the subject. I suggest you watch them.
Its not FALSE. the bigger picture is the paradigm which forces most women to be stay at home mothers is male dominated because it enables men to be careerists while women are forced out of the career path to raise the kids. Children are brought up by women but its under a larger patriarchal backdrop.
thomas81 wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
The irony is he supports radical Islam so thats a shot in the foot right there!
You're a liar, and a spectacularly bad one. When did i say I support radical Islam?
I support legitimate nationalist struggles against larger oppressive powers, that is something completely different if you're referring to the Palestinians.
I would support Bashir Assad (a seculiarist) before I support the Syrian Islamist rebels.
Al-Assad isn't supported by the people, and comes from the same party as Saddam Hussein. Radical Islam grew as a radical centrist alternative to communism and Arab socialism, and even King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is less of a d!ck to his people than Bashad Al-Assad or Saddam Hussein was. The USSR is at least partially responsible for the lack of women's rights in some Middle Eastern countries today.
thomas81
Veteran

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
Kurgan wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
The irony is he supports radical Islam so thats a shot in the foot right there!
You're a liar, and a spectacularly bad one. When did i say I support radical Islam?
I support legitimate nationalist struggles against larger oppressive powers, that is something completely different if you're referring to the Palestinians.
I would support Bashir Assad (a seculiarist) before I support the Syrian Islamist rebels.
Al-Assad isn't supported by the people, and comes from the same party as Saddam Hussein. Radical Islam grew as a radical centrist alternative to communism and Arab socialism, and even King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is less of a d!ck to his people than Bashad Al-Assad or Saddam Hussein was. The USSR is at least partially responsible for the lack of women's rights in some Middle Eastern countries today.
Al-Assad isn't a particularly nice cookie but all that is going to come from his defeat is Al Quaeda obtaining an even bigger sphere of influence than they had before.
Its quite hypocritical of anyone to accuse me of being an Islamist sympathiser when I am not the one cheering for their further influence in the middle east.
As for how much support Assad has I suspect the hacks in the western media lie about the actual proportions just like they tried made out Gadaffi had no popular support either which was a craven lie. Its probably somewhat 50-50. Otherwise the rebels wouldnt need help from the west.
Last edited by thomas81 on 16 Feb 2014, 12:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.