Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In

Page 8 of 29 [ 452 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 29 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

16 Feb 2016, 10:23 am

nurseangela wrote:

Kraichgauer wrote:

nurseangela wrote:

KRAICHGAUER :

I don't sleep with a pillow over my head. You? Nothing else is being explained so why should the pillow be explained? Maybe someone almost got caught.

There is NO EXCUSE for having no autopsy or toxicology.

No one on the Left is explaining anything that makes sense. You want to look the other way on this too, go ahead. That's what the Left ALWAYS does. Very convenient.

I think more than enough people here have explained why Scalia might have slept with a pillow over his head.
But you get your news from Michael Savage????? You do know that he's an autism denier, don't you?

I knew someone would bring this up. This is what I mean by thinking for yourself and asking questions and finding facts. I have several different news sources that I listen to and Michael Savage is one. So is Glenn Beck, Drudge, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and to a point Fox News and CNN. I will not listen to MSNBC. Even though I may listen to these sources I also pick and choose what I believe. I will listen then compare notes to the others. I will not believe anything if there is conflicting information. I find the big channels like CNN and Fox aren't going to tell the small bits of info that could be important. People always say they don't think these sources are credible, but Glenn Beck, Savage and Alex Jones will tell you what they know and then not to accept what they say as fact, but to research and make sure what they are saying is true.

About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.

If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.

I would suggest you listen to Thom Hartman if you want real news or facts. There are other sources, but he is rather good. Go online and stream his show. You can even call in and dispute him He'll take all calls as long as you aren't drunk or foul mouthed as he is on the air...

pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

16 Feb 2016, 10:25 am

AspE wrote:

nurseangela wrote:

...

I knew someone would bring this up. This is what I mean by thinking for yourself and asking questions and finding facts. I have several different news sources that I listen to and Michael Savage is one. So is Glenn Beck, Drudge, Alex Jones, Sean Hannity, and to a point Fox News and CNN. I will not listen to MSNBC. Even though I may listen to these sources I also pick and choose what I believe. I will listen then compare notes to the others. I will not believe anything if there is conflicting information. I find the big channels like CNN and Fox aren't going to tell the small bits of info that could be important. People always say they don't think these sources are credible, but Glenn Beck, Savage and Alex Jones will tell you what they know and then not to accept what they say as fact, but to research and make sure what they are saying is true.

About Savage and how he thinks about autism, I read what he had to say and I chose not to believe it - otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, that's his opinion and he is able to speak his views. I'm an advocate for free speech.

If there are any news sources people here use that they think tell the truth, then I'd be more than willing to add them to my list of news sources.

Those are all crazy people. Glenn Beck is possibly clinically insane. Hannity is just an idiot. Alex Jones is a moron. Michael Savage is a professional angry person.

It's not possible to have a less controversial death. I bet his conscience finally had enough and strangled him. Good riddance to an ignorant piece of s**t.

I'm an Atheist, but amen...

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

16 Feb 2016, 10:52 am

Alex Jones, savage, et. All are not 'news.' They're professional shock-jocks. You might as well get informed by World Nut Daily or Coast To Coast am.

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

16 Feb 2016, 11:02 am

There is no real "news" period

it's all propagandists and snake oil salesmen

If I actually thought Obama and the Democrats could force their nominee thru then maybe I'd care more about a potential conspiracy but they can't so they won't get to make this next appointment so killing Scalia would be pretty pointless. Wonder who Trump will name to the court...

Last edited by Jacoby on 16 Feb 2016, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

16 Feb 2016, 11:03 am

nurseangela wrote:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/15/texas-judge-who-decided-no-autopsy-was-needed-in-scalia-death-discloses-new-details/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Firewire%20Morning%20Edition%20Recurring%20v2%202016-02-16&utm_term=Firewire_Morning_Test

This just in. The Justice of the Peace is trying to paint Scalia with all these "supposed" health problems relating to his heart. Scalia evidently had an MRI done of his shoulder and she is saying that Scalia wasn't a surgical candidate because of cardiac problems. Patients do have to go through a cardiac workup and be cleared by a cardiologist for surgery. Scalia evidently needed a rotator cuff surgery and was told that physical therapy would be best. Scalia needed rotator cuff surgery because he's an AVID TENNIS PLAYER according to the article. I went on the Internet to find other evidence that Scalia did play tennis and I did find several sources that confirmed it to be true. If the guy can play tennis, he sure doesn't have any heart problems. Another piece of the puzzle.

It's recommended that people with heart conditions exercise if they are able.Being a nurse,you should know this.
http://www.eastern.usta.com/Resources/m ... the_heart/

_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi

AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

16 Feb 2016, 11:10 am

I wonder if the medical advice being shared here to justify[?] the death of Justice Scalia (age 79) would be so quickly shared about, say, justices Breyer (age 77) or Ginsburg (age 82). No, I didn't think so.

_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)

AspE
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

16 Feb 2016, 11:17 am

Jacoby wrote:

They better be able to justify this with more than just "we hate Obama". That's no way to run a country.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

16 Feb 2016, 11:18 am

AspieUtah wrote:

Yes,I think so.Look at their ages.Old age is a major factor in death.The best we can hope for when we reach that period of our lives is that we die peacefully in our sleep,better than lingering in a hospital bed.

_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

16 Feb 2016, 11:19 am

I don't believe the Supreme Court justices are as much of a slave to politics as we think they are.

AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

16 Feb 2016, 11:20 am

If Ginsburg had died in February 2007, would the argument of "we hate Bush" have convinced any Democrat that the right thing to do would be to blame her "failing health" and rush the process?

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

16 Feb 2016, 11:23 am

naturalplastic wrote:

Must be the Illuminati!

I think it was the Reptilians.

_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi

pcuser
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Dec 2014
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 913

16 Feb 2016, 11:30 am

kraftiekortie wrote:

I don't believe the Supreme Court justices are as much of a slave to politics as we think they are.

Then how then do you explain Bush v. Gore in 2000?

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

16 Feb 2016, 11:34 am

pcuser wrote:

kraftiekortie wrote:

I don't believe the Supreme Court justices are as much of a slave to politics as we think they are.

Then how then do you explain Bush v. Gore in 2000?

or National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

16 Feb 2016, 11:38 am

Given it is thought Obama can off Scalia and ensure the official bodies and his family do not call for an autopsy - what good would an autopsy do? Is it really beyond imagination that he could bribe or threaten a pathologist?

The fun thing about conspiracy theories is they cannot be disproven, as anything that might seem to disprove can easily be a lie from The Powers That Be. Only trusting sources that agree with you is not the best way to get to the bottom of things.

_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.

AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

16 Feb 2016, 11:47 am

Do I believe that Justice Scalia was murdered? It appears so, in my opinion because we have other similar deaths with which we can compare it. Can I prove it? Of course, not.

No, my concern is far more focused on the Republican-Democratic debate now raging (almost on cue) about the socio-political results of the next Court nominee. Both political parties have reasons to stand their ground. In the midst of this carnival, do we really believe that there are no "interested parties" doing what they must to guarantee the result?

Lukeda420
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,640
Location: Chicago suburbs.

16 Feb 2016, 11:54 am

AspieUtah wrote:

Yes and most of the deaths that are comparable are also from natural causes. How is it so unbelievable that a 79 year old man died in his sleep?

Page 8 of 29 [ 452 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 29 Next

Jump to:

Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In Post Reply New Topic

Scalia Death Conflicting Reports Coming In