The Palestinians were the "original Canaanites"
This argument again? I can't understand why Christians keep using this argument.
The Bible is so simple that a child can understand it? Yes, but what does this prove?
A child can't understand quantum mechanics. Does this mean that quantum mechanics is wrong?
I read the Bible. I understand it. I understand that the Bible regards women as men's property. It was created by a society which was undemocratic, and never even considered democracy as a possibility. That's blatantly obvious to anyone who has actually read it.
Here's the thing that surprised me most about the Old Testament: There are small portions about miracles, but most of the book is about ancient Israelite warfare and macho boasting. The book was clearly written by and for Ancient Israelites. It is no longer relevant as a book of morals or absolute truth.
At this point, the Bible is only relevant as a historical artifact.
You clearly have no idea what we were talking about, I wrote that about the false affirmations Boo made about the extermination of the Canaanites. Boo quoted bits of the texts and misused them to get to the wrong conclusions.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Then why do you people get so upset at 9/11 and ISIS actions?
This whole Trump campaign that all muslims are evils, while devout Christians use the exact same logic to justify old genocides?
They use the exactly the same arguments "Allah said to kill you, he doesn't owe us an explanation - Allah said you are disbelievers to be beheaded...bla bla".
Peacesells, I will not apologize, I can't respect texts that call for genocide - if you see them as sacred and get offended on the fact that I don't respect these texts that is your problem, not mine.
Jesus was a political reformist, he almost abolished all the ancient laws - if we look today at the Christian way of life , it has really nothing to do with the Jewish way of life, or its laws (ie. you eat pork, jews don't eat pork....etc) - the only common thing they have is the OT, but most modern Christian denominations don't live in the "OT way".
Mohammad and the sect he came from (The ebionites), who were one of the few non-Trinitarian Jesus followers who rejected to abandon the old ways, viewed this reform was taken to the extreme and wanted to restore the old Jewish laws to the region....and this agenda evolved to Islam.
This sect was hated by everybody: Jews viewed them as heretics because of Jesus , and Christians viewed them as heretics because they (the ebionites) reject Jesus' divinity. Perhaps why it turned to that violent sect called Islam.
So yeah, everything changed when Jesus showed up , but everything are getting reversed back when Mohammad showed up.
Christians justifying genocide? See, here is where I actually start having fun with these discussions. And no, this isn’t my first trip to the rodeo. Answer this very simple question, if you can:
Where precisely in the Gospels did Jesus instruct His followers to commit genocide?
I said nothing about the Gospel- where in my post I said Jesus was pro genocide?
i was talking about the OT, and you as Christians should believe in OT too.
It’s funny you’re saying that Christians don’t support genocides but this what you are exactly doing in this thread; you are justifying the genocides in OT.
You are creating false accusations:
This what I said about Jesus, where did I say he supported genocides?
Are you smoking something?
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 08 Jun 2018, 10:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
This argument again? I can't understand why Christians keep using this argument.
The Bible is so simple that a child can understand it? Yes, but what does this prove?
A child can't understand quantum mechanics. Does this mean that quantum mechanics is wrong?
I read the Bible. I understand it. I understand that the Bible regards women as men's property. It was created by a society which was undemocratic, and never even considered democracy as a possibility. That's blatantly obvious to anyone who has actually read it.
Here's the thing that surprised me most about the Old Testament: There are small portions about miracles, but most of the book is about ancient Israelite warfare and macho boasting. The book was clearly written by and for Ancient Israelites. It is no longer relevant as a book of morals or absolute truth.
At this point, the Bible is only relevant as a historical artifact.
You clearly have no idea what we were talking about, I wrote that about the false affirmations Boo made about the extermination of the Canaanites. Boo quoted bits of the texts and misused them to get to the wrong conclusions.
The affirmation that God commanded genocide is true.
The affirmation that Isralites did exterminate all Canaanites was wrong, because this what I was told by Zionist commenters.
i appologize for the latter but not for the first - I still hate the OT texts.
And i have nothing against the Gospel texts, my problem is with the OT.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Then why do you people get so upset at 9/11 and ISIS actions?
This whole Trump campaign that all muslims are evils, while devout Christians use the exact same logic to justify old genocides?
They use the exactly the same arguments "Allah said to kill you, he doesn't owe us an explanation - Allah said you are disbelievers to be beheaded...bla bla".
Peacesells, I will not apologize, I can't respect texts that call for genocide - if you see them as sacred and get offended on the fact that I don't respect these texts that is your problem, not mine.
Don't you have a degree? You ask me questions that are easily answered, even a child could do that, you post a thread containing false information and you make assumptions without quoting anything. Are you f*****g with me or what? Lame provokations, that's what it is.
You should apologize for accusing our sacred texts of lying while it's not true and even a child could understand it.
Now, because you've been proven wrong and it's been exposed that your thread is full of BS, you try to jump on the moral high-horse with your atheist s**t I couldn't care less about. Go home Boo, you're drunk!
Stop yelling like a whining baby.
Now tell me, what’s your view on Israel and Palestinians?
You think it’s ok to continue the extermination of any remaining Canaanite blood because this what God cammanded in the OT?
I mean... why should they stop now, did God put a time frame for the genocide of this ethnicity?
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
and you call my whole thread BS full of wrong things just because of one wrong information (that bible said all Canaanites are killed)?
Yet you can’t deny that your God did command his “people” to do it. It IS written in your OT.
A murder and a failed attempt of murder is almost the same sin. Don’t you think? You are making it sound that the latter is so morally different than the first.
- you are the one who’s making a BS fuss over a minor difference in interpreting the text.
There is no moral difference between a successful murder and a failed murder.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
His argument that this command made sense back in the time, and due to specific circumstances (because he thinks the Canaanites were too wicked, a common argument bible preacheds use but not much backed by historians) is exactly the kind of argument used by moderate Muslims when they justify Jihad (they also claim that Pagan Arabs were too wicked and to be damned by God).
So yeah, stop trying to shut me up; I don’t fear Muslims so I certainly don’t fear you.
Lol what is it, your thread argument was proved wrong and now you are all like "huuhh puur canunits it was wruuang!!!11!!"? It's pitiful really. Next time you insult our sacred texts make sure to read them properly before coming here to whine.
Where was I proven wrong? I was stating Zionist claims derived from the bible. Was it the whole concept of Israel is based on the bible, wasn't their main argument that the Palestinians are actually 'Arabs' sitting there who are not the original natives and therefore it's ok to kick them out?
I have seen this narrative many many many many times in forums and political websites, countless of times. The zionist narrative clearly indicates that they don't believe the Canaanites have survived. They believe that Palestinians are totally Arabians.
And if you mean that I was wrong on saying that Bible claimed that Canaanites were exterminated, ok fine...a minor mistake in details, however no one can deny that the bible God did order them to exterminate them all.
“You shall not leave alive anything that breathes,” God said in the passage. “But you shall utterly destroy them.”
It really makes no difference, it's like saying that Hitler was not so bad because he didn't succeed to kill all Jews even if it was his ultimate wish. Seriously, pshhh.
A loving, good God doesn't order a genocide against anybody. That's mortal thinking and justification.
And what you see as sacred, I don't see it as sacred at all.
You don’t know that. God doesn’t require our understanding for his own actions. If He chooses genocide, He is at liberty to do so.
Questioning God is like a small child questioning a parent. I typically do explain myself to my children and ask them questions to make sure they understand what I’ve just said. Once I know I’ve effectively communicated to them, I tell them to go their way and that I will follow up later. They may choose to obey my directives or not. But the time for giving orders and explaining myself has passed.
While it is rare, occasionally one of them will deliberately annoy me by asking useless questions in an attempt to frustrate or distract me enough that they get out of whatever task I put before them. I just remind them that I gave them a task, they understood the task, and there are consequences for failure. If they continue to defy me, I will punish them severely.
God doesn’t owe anyone an explanation, but there often is an explanation. If you love God, if you know God is present, if you know the directive came from God, you need no further explanation. Just get it done.
Genocide is merely something we are conditioned to believe only can be evil. We don’t have a concept of how good can come from it. We can’t understand how it can ever be justified. We have become highly sensitive to it. For all we know, wiping out a tribe was just another day in paradise for the ancients. Saying that genocide is evil across the board is preference bias, an imposition of personal subjectivity on something you know nothing about. The Canaanites were documented to be wicked past the point of redemption and the Israelites were to be their wake up call. So no, I think historians who say otherwise don’t know what they’re talking about.
Finally, the Bible establishes a pattern human failure to effectively carry out God’s will. Some Canaanites were able to get a final chance at life and redemption. Some were saved spiritually, and many Israelites opted to mix with Canaanites and adopt their customs and religion, thus losing their right to God’s promise.
When the Jews returned from exile, they had a chance to restore true worship and spread their faith to the nations. It seems they were somewhat successful for a while. Under Roman rule, their religion became about playing politics and the outward display of holiness unobtainable by the masses. Priests couldn’t be bothered to tend to the sick, the poor, and the uncleansed. Jesus once again shows up to restore the spirit of the Law and bring the whole world back into the fold.
The pattern continues to play out, and I do see the Catholic Church as a Christian version of the Pharisees. The Church became married to the state, and enjoyed a period of being the only unifying element after the fall of Rome and throughout the medieval period. Between the third century and the enlightenment, theology and practice was corrupted. Once people realized they COULD leave, they did, and now you have a plethora of denominations who worship according to their conscience. And when that ultimately fails, the pattern repeats.
Everything changed when Jesus showed up. I don’t think the old justifications for things work anymore. A just war is fought to protect people. But wholesale extermination? That’s not what Jesus taught.
We haven't just been conditioned to think that genocide is wrong, IT IS WRONG!
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Boo, you've reported peaceless for a personal attack, while you yourself have compared him to a whining baby and have asked angelrho if he's smoking something....and that was just the last page.
I'm not sure whose insult has the most significance here, considering that this is PPR.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Then why do you people get so upset at 9/11 and ISIS actions?
This whole Trump campaign that all muslims are evils, while devout Christians use the exact same logic to justify old genocides?
They use the exactly the same arguments "Allah said to kill you, he doesn't owe us an explanation - Allah said you are disbelievers to be beheaded...bla bla".
Peacesells, I will not apologize, I can't respect texts that call for genocide - if you see them as sacred and get offended on the fact that I don't respect these texts that is your problem, not mine.
Jesus was a political reformist, he almost abolished all the ancient laws - if we look today at the Christian way of life , it has really nothing to do with the Jewish way of life, or its laws (ie. you eat pork, jews don't eat pork....etc) - the only common thing they have is the OT, but most modern Christian denominations don't live in the "OT way".
Mohammad and the sect he came from (The ebionites), who were one of the few non-Trinitarian Jesus followers who rejected to abandon the old ways, viewed this reform was taken to the extreme and wanted to restore the old Jewish laws to the region....and this agenda evolved to Islam.
This sect was hated by everybody: Jews viewed them as heretics because of Jesus , and Christians viewed them as heretics because they (the ebionites) reject Jesus' divinity. Perhaps why it turned to that violent sect called Islam.
So yeah, everything changed when Jesus showed up , but everything are getting reversed back when Mohammad showed up.
Christians justifying genocide? See, here is where I actually start having fun with these discussions. And no, this isn’t my first trip to the rodeo. Answer this very simple question, if you can:
Where precisely in the Gospels did Jesus instruct His followers to commit genocide?
I said nothing about the Gospel- where in my post I said Jesus was pro genocide?
i was talking about the OT, and you as Christians should believe in OT too.
It’s funny you’re saying that Christians don’t support genocides but this what you are exactly doing in this thread; you are justifying the genocides in OT.
You are creating false accusations:
This what I said about Jesus, where did I say he supported genocides?
Are you smoking something?
I didn’t say you did say Jesus commanded genocide. Old genocides may or may not be justified, but you can’t show that without context and without directly knowing God’s will. This is only a problem for a non-believer.
But OT commands were given from God to Hebrews by and through Hebrews. Of course this doesn’t apply to Christians. Why would it? Christians struggle with answering for this because those laws weren’t given to us. Only the laws of Noah were meant to have any universality. The decalogue is basically an elaboration on the Noah laws, and the Jews have some 600+ laws besides. And then you have to look at the laws specifically and their purpose.
Holiness laws are the most relevant to Christians. Ritual purity and temple holiness laws died with the temple, so continued observance of them are mostly symbolic. Law and order instructions are the same as our laws and can be adjusted or repealed as needed. Western societies still practice lex talionis, or “eye for an eye,” and concepts such as workers comp and acccidental injury/death insurance are built on Biblical principles. And then you have rules that strictly apply to the Hebrews as a people and to no one else.
So Christians should strictly follow OT...why, exactly?
Another problem is that strict adherence to a lengthy list of rules misses the point. The laws are broken down into two parts: Love God, love people. And there are more laws governing how people are to take care of each other than there are about worshiping God. Following the Law might have been well-intentioned at one point in time, but eventually the part about loving God and loving people got lost and it became entirely self-serving.
Jesus couldn’t have been a reformer. He didn’t reform anything. He fulfilled the Law through His sacrifice. The point is salvation, not what laws you follow. Only after the issue of salvation is resolved, next is to understand what it looks like when someone is saved. And that goes back to loving God and loving people. Jesus sets this up before the cross, basically restoring the meaning behind the OT laws and extending God’s grace to the whole world, which was the intention all along.
Which brings us BACK to my earlier question. Where is it Jesus instructed His followers to commit genocide? Either He did or He didn’t. If He didn’t, then are people who claim to follow Jesus but promote genocide really following Jesus? If they don’t follow Jesus, are they even really Christians?
That’s not to say Christians can’t or don’t commit genocide. That’s not even saying those who do are condemned to Gehenna. It just means if they do those kinds of things or rationalize genocide, it didn’t come from Jesus. It came from someone or something else.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
I'm not sure whose insult has the most significance here, considering that this is PPR.
Usually of whose who attacks first.
But that’s fine.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
You are still asking about something I never said about Jesus.
But my logic is simple: His Father did command genocide in the OT, and you believe in the same God of Jews - are you saying that his son is morally better and more merciful than his Father?
And I don’t buy the whole “circumstance at the time” logic; this is an argument used by Muslims countless of times to justify Mohammad’s genocides.
Like for example the genocide of Khaybr - an old Arab Jewish tribe that got almost exterminated by Mohammad’s army, their women and kids got enslaved and their gold got stolen.
Now, some Muslims get shocked when they learn of the Khayber story and question why God would command to attack a Jewish community? There’s nothing in the Jewish faith and practices that contradict the pillars of Islam hence from Islamic point, Jews can’t be considered as disbelievers or idolators.
Muslim clerics though, typically justify it that, at this time, this “particular” Jewish community have committed a violation and treason to the truce they had with Mohammad’s state - and that their leaders were secretly cooperating with the pagan Arabs. Yeah, as if this justifies to kill their men and enslave all their women and kids. What a nice God.
AngelRho, you remind me so much of Muslim Clerics, you sound exactly like them - I am imagining you having a beard with a towel-like hat on head doing the Friday speech in a mosque.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
You are still asking about something I never said about Jesus.
But my logic is simple: His Father did command genocide in the OT, and you believe in the same God of Jews - are you saying that his son is morally better and more merciful than his Father?
And I don’t buy the whole “circumstance at the time” logic; this is an argument used by Muslims countless of times to justify Mohammad’s genocides.
Like for example the genocide of Khaybr - an old Arab Jewish tribe that got almost exterminated by Mohammad’s army, their women and kids got enslaved and their gold got stolen.
Now, some Muslims get shocked when they learn of the Khayber story and question why God would command to attack a Jewish community? There’s nothing in the Jewish faith and practices that contradict the pillars of Islam hence from Islamic point, Jews can’t be considered as disbelievers or idolators.
Muslim clerics though, typically justify it that, at this time, this “particular” Jewish community have committed a violation and treason to the truce they had with Mohammad’s state - and that their leaders were secretly cooperating with the pagan Arabs. Yeah, as if this justifies to kill their men and enslave all their women and kids. What a nice God.
AngelRho, you remind me so much of Muslim Clerics, you sound exactly like them - I am imagining you having a beard with a towel-like hat on head doing the Friday speech in a mosque.
Boo, I need you to focus.
I know you didn’t say anything about what Jesus said. I’m asking a question about what you know about what Christians have claimed. Are Christians using an OT rationale for genocide? If so, are they following a directive from Jesus? If they are, then that directive must be somewhere in the gospels. If that directive is NOT in the gospels, we have no reason to believe Jesus intended for Christians to kill everyone who doesn’t believe or act as they do or target an ethno-religious group for extermination.
It’s logically possible to find some rationale somewhere. Did Jesus actually promote that? Do you even know?
I don’t believe Jesus ever said that. I don’t recall ever reading it in the Gospels. Which means Christians can not justify genocide on religious grounds. And I don’t grant nominal Christians any legitimacy.
If you know where in the gospels Jesus commanded genocide, I’d love to see it for myself.
Now tell me, what’s your view on Israel and Palestinians?
You think it’s ok to continue the extermination of any remaining Canaanite blood because this what God cammanded in the OT?
I mean... why should they stop now, did God put a time frame for the genocide of this ethnicity?
Plot twist! I, ehm, don't really like Jews much... Let's say.
As I see it, both Israel and Palestine are guilty of terrorism and war crimes against each other.
Your article was about Lebanese people, it didn't mention Palestinians at all.
I can easily deny that God didn't order all Canaanites to be killed, it's even written in the Bible but you still haven't read it properly it seems. Odd, considering that you quoted bits from that same passage.
Awww, you reported me, how cute. It was you who started it, btw.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Now tell me, what’s your view on Israel and Palestinians?
You think it’s ok to continue the extermination of any remaining Canaanite blood because this what God cammanded in the OT?
I mean... why should they stop now, did God put a time frame for the genocide of this ethnicity?
Plot twist! I, ehm, don't really like Jews much... Let's say.
As I see it, both Israel and Palestine are guilty of terrorism and war crimes against each other.
Your article was about Lebanese people, it didn't mention Palestinians at all.
I can easily deny that God didn't order all Canaanites to be killed, it's even written in the Bible but you still haven't read it properly it seems. Odd, considering that you quoted bits from that same passage.
Awww, you reported me, how cute. It was you who started it, btw.
I THINK I know what you mean about not all Canaanites being part of the command, but if you don’t mind, can you cite Biblical evidence to that effect? My understanding is that command was restricted to the Promised Land itself, and the borders are clearly defined. Canaanites are a people group, not a region, and the OT is clear when it refers to the region (Canaan) vs. the people who lived there. The OT also mentions that God Himself will go before the Israelites to drive out the inhabitants of the region and when and how they are to actually go into battle.
So in a completely different sense, YHWH didn’t give that order. But in another sense He did.
Is that what you’re referring to, or is it something else?
