04 Mar 2022, 5:54 pm
04 Mar 2022, 6:20 pm
cyberdad wrote:
ironpony wrote:
Oh ok.
Also, would a lot more people be on Rittenhouse's side more if it was a woman instead who shot when being attacked after running?
Also, would a lot more people be on Rittenhouse's side more if it was a woman instead who shot when being attacked after running?
If the victims were female Rittenhouse would be in jail
I am having comprehension problems here.
I was under the impression ironpony was suggesting Rittenhouse was a woman.
04 Mar 2022, 7:07 pm
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
ironpony wrote:
Oh ok.
Also, would a lot more people be on Rittenhouse's side more if it was a woman instead who shot when being attacked after running?
Also, would a lot more people be on Rittenhouse's side more if it was a woman instead who shot when being attacked after running?
If the victims were female Rittenhouse would be in jail
I am having comprehension problems here.
I was under the impression ironpony was suggesting Rittenhouse was a woman.
Me, too, although I had to reread it a few times to get there. First impression had me thinking he meant Rittenhouse had killed women, but I knew that couldn't be right.
It's an interesting question, how things would have been different if Rittenhouse had been a woman. But, realistically, female teens know better than to show up to a situation like that. Girls are exposed quickly to all the reasons females aren't safe in certain situations and the concept gets strongly embedded. Only a female trained for the purpose would think of going, and that would change the entire scenario by more than gender. It's really an impossible and improbable scenario.
04 Mar 2022, 9:19 pm
04 Mar 2022, 10:18 pm
cyberdad wrote:
A 17 year old girl wouldn't go walking through groups of angry men with an AR15
Depends on the girl...
04 Mar 2022, 10:25 pm
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
A 17 year old girl wouldn't go walking through groups of angry men with an AR15
Depends on the girl...
Oh! I thought you were going to point out this one
04 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
cyberdad wrote:
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
A 17 year old girl wouldn't go walking through groups of angry men with an AR15
Depends on the girl...
Oh! I thought you were going to point out this one
Even better.
She actually has a rifle.
05 Mar 2022, 12:43 am
05 Mar 2022, 1:45 am
05 Mar 2022, 2:43 am
05 Mar 2022, 2:44 am
League_Girl wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
A 17 year old girl wouldn't go walking through groups of angry men with an AR15
Kaitlin Bennet might have at that age.
OMG yes
She does because she can....she's the queen of white privilege, thanks.
05 Mar 2022, 3:01 am
cyberdad wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
A 17 year old girl wouldn't go walking through groups of angry men with an AR15
Kaitlin Bennet might have at that age.
OMG yes
She does because she can....she's the queen of white privilege, thanks.
I forgot all about her.
05 Mar 2022, 12:22 pm
05 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
05 Mar 2022, 7:37 pm
06 Mar 2022, 12:55 am
blitzkrieg wrote:
Biological women with guns can be every bit as deadly as men. In fact, it is a great thing, when a biological woman is good with firearms, because biological women can even out the natural physical disadvantage that they face from biologically male bullies, who think they can call the shots for no other reason than they are bigger, usually, physically, than biological females.
Guns are an equaliser in the favour of biological women, who are at a disadvantage physically, from biological men.
Guns are an equaliser in the favour of biological women, who are at a disadvantage physically, from biological men.
I've heard women are better-suited to being fighter jet pilots because they can handle "G" forces better.
