You may be a Communist if . . .

Page 8 of 15 [ 238 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 15 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,498
Location: Right over your left shoulder

28 Jul 2023, 2:46 pm

Fnord wrote:

Aspiegaming wrote:

Fnord wrote:

Capitalism is not without its flaws; but Communism sucks all over.

The thing I don't like about the flaws of capitalism is that nobody is allowed to fix them no matter how bad they get. Anyone who tries gets called a commie.

Why fix them when you can adapt to them and exploit them?

Why try to make things better for everyone when you can just make things better for yourself at other's expense?

Because behaving that way says something about the sort of person one is. f**k y'all, I got mine is a sh***y motto to live by.

_________________
“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas, this is part of our strategy” —Netanyahu
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
GOP Predators

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

30 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm

You focus on the state, not on capitalism. Anarchocommunists prioritize the elimination of the state. Marxist communists prioritize the elimination of capitalism and see a temporary function for the state. Therefore, your posting is anarchist, not Marxist.

_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute

Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,892
Location: wales

30 Jul 2023, 3:01 pm

Weight Of Memory wrote:

Capitalism doesn't care about fairness. Capitalism is how can I enrich myself by maximizing profits. Capitalism is "successful" because a lot of humans, deep down inside, are sh***y people.

There are a lot of sh***y capitalist who want to exploit everyone they can for profit but there are also a lot of sh***y bums who have zero luck in a capitalist society but still want to exploit everyone they can while contributing nothing.

We all hear about lottery winners being hounded for money and often having to go into hiding to various degrees because of the latter types of people.

Also, there seemed to be a higher proportion of sh***y communists rather than sh***y capitalists on a per head basis in their respective nations. At least being an exploitative millionaire limits the number of exploiters by nature of having to be a millionaire to really become a nuisance.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,172
Location: Stendec

30 Jul 2023, 8:35 pm

nominalist wrote:

AFAIK, Anarcho-Syndicalism prioritizes elimination of the State, elimination of currency, and elimination of personal property; all leading to a society that does what needs to be done when and where necessary.

The clearest depiction of Anarcho-Syndicalism I have seen is in Ursula K. LeGuin's "The Dispossessed".

_________________

No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.

Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,892
Location: wales

31 Jul 2023, 9:41 am

Fnord wrote:

nominalist wrote:

Didn't realise there was that many forms of communism but obviously, having no government is a serious problem. Firstly being born stateless means you can't travel and have very little, if any human rights. Land belonging to nobody can also be invaded and exploited by any state that desires new land and with no currency, trade becomes very difficult and food security almost impossible.

It's practically like going back to the stone age only a lot worse.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

31 Jul 2023, 7:29 pm

Fnord wrote:

The personal property one is, in particular, a significant difference. As a Marxist communist, I like my personal property (my condo, my car, etc.). Because I have personal property does not make me a capitalist. I oppose private property which is another word for capitalism.

The elimination of currency is a debatable issue among Marxists. Marx himself never mentioned it. The elimination of the state is viewed as a long-term objective, not an immediate objective. There are however autonomist Marxists and open Marxists who would agree with the anarchist view.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

31 Jul 2023, 7:31 pm

Nades wrote:

Didn't realise there was that many forms of communism ....

There are hundreds of communist proposals (no exaggeration).

Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,892
Location: wales

01 Aug 2023, 2:42 am

nominalist wrote:

Nades wrote:

Didn't realise there was that many forms of communism ....

There are hundreds of communist proposals (no exaggeration).

It'll be hard to describe anarchy as anything other than anarchy though.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,172
Location: Stendec

01 Aug 2023, 3:18 am

nominalist wrote:

Nades wrote:

Didn't realise there was that many forms of communism ....

There are hundreds of communist proposals (no exaggeration).

And each is considered "Not True Communism" by all the others.

_________________

No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.

Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,392
Location: Texas

01 Aug 2023, 3:39 am

nominalist wrote:

Nades wrote:

Didn't realise there was that many forms of communism ....

There are hundreds of communist proposals (no exaggeration).

Hi.Could a group of Christians or other religious people that live in the same house and hold all property in common be classified as a form of communism.I thought somewhere in the Communist Manifesto Marx talked about how the early Christians shared all their property in Acts.I just dont know if a Christian commune counts as a form of communism.Thanks.I know many people would not classify Christian communes and apostolic socialism as true communism.

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,172
Location: Stendec

01 Aug 2023, 3:47 am

The Christians still used currency and were governed -- not true Communism.

_________________

No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.

Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1933
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,892
Location: wales

01 Aug 2023, 3:49 am

Fnord wrote:

The Christians still used currency and were governed -- not true Communism.

Yeah I'm not sure about how this anarchy type communism can even exist. How can there be communism with no government to enforce it?

Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,172
Location: Stendec

01 Aug 2023, 3:59 am

Nades wrote:

Fnord wrote:

The Christians still used currency and were governed -- not true Communism.

Yeah I'm not sure about how this anarchy type communism can even exist. How can there be communism with no government to enforce it?

No government, no enforcement. If your neighbor is a hoarder, you raid his home. If your other neighbor doesn't work, you let him starve. Get the picture? The "Common Good" is all that matters, and those who serve only themselves suffer for it.

Of course, when everyone is equally poor, there is more than enough suffering to go around.

_________________

No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

01 Aug 2023, 6:30 am

Nades wrote:

It'll be hard to describe anarchy as anything other than anarchy though.

Visit The Anarchist Library. You will also find hundreds of anarchist proposals; and that site excludes many right-wing versions.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

01 Aug 2023, 6:34 am

Fnord wrote:

And each is considered "Not True Communism" by all the others.

There are some dogmatists to be sure, but not every communist (me, for instance) is a dogmatist. I am open to all sorts of versions of communism. The more communist proposals, the better.

nominalist
Supporting Member

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

01 Aug 2023, 7:35 am

Fnord wrote:

Of course, when everyone is equally poor, there is more than enough suffering to go around.

Communism was conceived by Marx and Engels as a path to universal prosperity, not poverty. It is capitalism which produces poverty.

Page 8 of 15 [ 238 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 15 Next

Jump to:

You may be a Communist if . . . Post Reply New Topic

You may be a Communist if . . .