snake321 wrote:
Delirium wrote:
Fun fact: He has ties to white-power groups.
Just because he accepted funds from them doesn't mean he supports their cause. I'm sure he'll take donations from anyone, money supports his campaigne does it not? That doesn't mean he's gonna spend the money on white power objectives.
He said that the donators "had wasted their money if they were trying to influence policy".
However.
I don't think that Ron Paul has the most realistic and fair ideals.
The US constitution was written a long time ago, and not all US laws are constitutional.
Ron Paul's policies would benefit corporations because of the low taxes, although his federal reserve policies might be a reason why he has not gained much support.
In reality, he is almost Libertarian. He proposes massive budget cuts, a policy of non-intervention, and very minimal taxes. A revision of the tax system would be more suitable, as well as a revision of government operations.
I don't like the implications of Libertarianism, and it is like implicating one evil to replace the other. The USA would be better off with a Democrat leader, so long as it isn't Hilary Clinton or someone who proposes radical green taxes and unwanted intrusion on peoples' personal lives and rights. PC-Nazis, no thanks.
Even though I'm British, I feel the need to comment.
_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!