slowmutant wrote:
Really? Then why was her name beatified after her death? Why is she now considered a saint? What an obscene and spurious comment to make. How disrespectful! She had more Christ-nature in her little finger than you will have in your entire body, ever. You're the Mutha in this case.
She worked with the poor and the lepers of Calcutta, India.
Tell me, what good things have you done? What good have you done in the world? Do you serve other people or just yourselves?
How do atheists demonstrate their love, compassion, and charity in this world? You are certainly not a bunch of saints & heroes.
Lies, lies, lies. Just because someone gets sainted does not mean their are beyond reproach. The Church may have beatified her but that means next to nothing to me. She was no saint of the people. I have a lot against her but it all can be summed up best in quote by her successor, Sister Nirmala,
Quote:
Poverty will always exist. We want the poor to see
poverty the right way--to accept it and believe
that the Lord will provide.
Anyone who opposes measures to improve the conditions of the world's most impoverished (especially raising the status of women) and instead encourages them to just accept their poverty, to see the "beauty" in it is no friend of the people. This is the single most important reason to oppose religion.
_________________
I live!