23 Sep 2011, 9:08 pm
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
You're supposed to be at work right now, aren't you?
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
I'd say nice try but it does't even qualify for that.
Get a job.
Isn't National Defense a responsibility of the Federal Government as stated in the Constitution of the United States...
If you were really a judge Pandabear like you claimed in the past, you would know that that responsibility is stated in the pre-amble (they called it common defense, before you try to split hairs).
Pandabear a judge.
That's pretty good.
Anyone that believes that I have some oceanfront condos in South Dakota I'll sell them for a good price.
And I never said it was a DOD contract in the first place.
We did have Little Inuyasha convinced for quite some time. He is probably still wondering whether I am really a judge or not.
I'm not really a judge. Or, am I?
Yes, National Defense is a responsibility of the United States government. And, those employed to carry out the government's missions (whether defense or something else) should not take their jobs for granted, whether civil servants or contractors. Not so long ago, people looked down their noses at government work. Now, people who have government jobs are indeed fortunate.
If a contractor is using government money to pay someone to insult the president and disseminate extreme right-wing garbage on the internet--well, you would expect that from Halliburton, but it is still an outrage.
Remember, Abgal64 said you weren't supposed to talk to me since I'm so terrible.
Yours truly,
The Outrage
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI[/youtube]
23 Sep 2011, 9:13 pm
23 Sep 2011, 9:13 pm
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
You're supposed to be at work right now, aren't you?
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
I'd say nice try but it does't even qualify for that.
Get a job.
Isn't National Defense a responsibility of the Federal Government as stated in the Constitution of the United States...
If you were really a judge Pandabear like you claimed in the past, you would know that that responsibility is stated in the pre-amble (they called it common defense, before you try to split hairs).
Pandabear a judge.
That's pretty good.
Anyone that believes that I have some oceanfront condos in South Dakota I'll sell them for a good price.
And I never said it was a DOD contract in the first place.
We did have Little Inuyasha convinced for quite some time. He is probably still wondering whether I am really a judge or not.
I'm not really a judge. Or, am I?
Yes, National Defense is a responsibility of the United States government. And, those employed to carry out the government's missions (whether defense or something else) should not take their jobs for granted, whether civil servants or contractors. Not so long ago, people looked down their noses at government work. Now, people who have government jobs are indeed fortunate.
If a contractor is using government money to pay someone to insult the president and disseminate extreme right-wing garbage on the internet--well, you would expect that from Halliburton, but it is still an outrage.
Remember, Abgal64 said you weren't supposed to talk to me since I'm so terrible.
Yours truly,
The Outrage
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI[/youtube]
Call me dense but I never see the connection with this.
A squad of gay Brittish soldiers????
24 Sep 2011, 7:14 am
25 Sep 2011, 2:04 am
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
You're supposed to be at work right now, aren't you?
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
I'd say nice try but it does't even qualify for that.
Get a job.
Isn't National Defense a responsibility of the Federal Government as stated in the Constitution of the United States...
If you were really a judge Pandabear like you claimed in the past, you would know that that responsibility is stated in the pre-amble (they called it common defense, before you try to split hairs).
Pandabear a judge.
That's pretty good.
Anyone that believes that I have some oceanfront condos in South Dakota I'll sell them for a good price.
And I never said it was a DOD contract in the first place.
We did have Little Inuyasha convinced for quite some time. He is probably still wondering whether I am really a judge or not.
I'm not really a judge. Or, am I?
Yes, National Defense is a responsibility of the United States government. And, those employed to carry out the government's missions (whether defense or something else) should not take their jobs for granted, whether civil servants or contractors. Not so long ago, people looked down their noses at government work. Now, people who have government jobs are indeed fortunate.
If a contractor is using government money to pay someone to insult the president and disseminate extreme right-wing garbage on the internet--well, you would expect that from Halliburton, but it is still an outrage.
Remember, Abgal64 said you weren't supposed to talk to me since I'm so terrible.
Yours truly,
The Outrage
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI[/youtube]
Call me dense but I never see the connection with this.
A squad of gay Brittish soldiers????
Based on their actions, I'm guessing they're French dressed up as British Soldiers, which makes even less sense.
25 Sep 2011, 8:25 am
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
You're supposed to be at work right now, aren't you?
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
I'd say nice try but it does't even qualify for that.
Get a job.
Isn't National Defense a responsibility of the Federal Government as stated in the Constitution of the United States...
If you were really a judge Pandabear like you claimed in the past, you would know that that responsibility is stated in the pre-amble (they called it common defense, before you try to split hairs).
Pandabear a judge.
That's pretty good.
Anyone that believes that I have some oceanfront condos in South Dakota I'll sell them for a good price.
And I never said it was a DOD contract in the first place.
We did have Little Inuyasha convinced for quite some time. He is probably still wondering whether I am really a judge or not.
I'm not really a judge. Or, am I?
Yes, National Defense is a responsibility of the United States government. And, those employed to carry out the government's missions (whether defense or something else) should not take their jobs for granted, whether civil servants or contractors. Not so long ago, people looked down their noses at government work. Now, people who have government jobs are indeed fortunate.
If a contractor is using government money to pay someone to insult the president and disseminate extreme right-wing garbage on the internet--well, you would expect that from Halliburton, but it is still an outrage.
Remember, Abgal64 said you weren't supposed to talk to me since I'm so terrible.
Yours truly,
The Outrage
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI[/youtube]
Call me dense but I never see the connection with this.
A squad of gay Brittish soldiers????
Based on their actions, I'm guessing they're French dressed up as British Soldiers, which makes even less sense.
You never heard of Monty Python's Flying Circus?
And you call yourself an Aspie.
Oodain
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
25 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
25 Sep 2011, 10:24 am
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
You're supposed to be at work right now, aren't you?
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
Oh, that's right. You're paid by a Department of Defense contractor. Sucking at the federal teat, like any welfare queen or retiree.
You referred to our president as a "boy." That's mighty Republican of you.
I'd say nice try but it does't even qualify for that.
Get a job.
Isn't National Defense a responsibility of the Federal Government as stated in the Constitution of the United States...
If you were really a judge Pandabear like you claimed in the past, you would know that that responsibility is stated in the pre-amble (they called it common defense, before you try to split hairs).
Pandabear a judge.
That's pretty good.
Anyone that believes that I have some oceanfront condos in South Dakota I'll sell them for a good price.
And I never said it was a DOD contract in the first place.
We did have Little Inuyasha convinced for quite some time. He is probably still wondering whether I am really a judge or not.
I'm not really a judge. Or, am I?
Yes, National Defense is a responsibility of the United States government. And, those employed to carry out the government's missions (whether defense or something else) should not take their jobs for granted, whether civil servants or contractors. Not so long ago, people looked down their noses at government work. Now, people who have government jobs are indeed fortunate.
If a contractor is using government money to pay someone to insult the president and disseminate extreme right-wing garbage on the internet--well, you would expect that from Halliburton, but it is still an outrage.
Remember, Abgal64 said you weren't supposed to talk to me since I'm so terrible.
Yours truly,
The Outrage
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI[/youtube]
Call me dense but I never see the connection with this.
A squad of gay Brittish soldiers????
Based on their actions, I'm guessing they're French dressed up as British Soldiers, which makes even less sense.
No the British military is pretty gay all on its own.
In fact the military tends to be a little gayer than civilian life.
Strong manly bonding lack of women.
feelings stirred up by combat and close quarters.
why do you think that DADT is such an issue.
The Civilian population is about 2% gay.
The numbers in service is much higher than that.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1MPF6gOHXc[/youtube]
25 Sep 2011, 8:42 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
I think that Sarah Palin is really HAWT!! !
Seriously, if Palin was really as stupid as the lamestream media or the left wing talking heads that post here claim, they wouldn't be so obsessed with trying to trash her.
Actually, "Conservatives" think that the term "intellectual" is an insult. "Conservatives" just don't like people who seem to be too smart, or too highly educated.
Calling Sarah Palin "stupid" is, to "Conservatives", a compliment. A "Conservative" would feel insulted if someone called him "Smart."
So, Sarah Palin is stupid. But, so are all "Conservatives."
25 Sep 2011, 8:44 pm
25 Sep 2011, 10:33 pm
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
So what, as long as we get elected and throw your boy out.
I don't think you've ever really seen mean.
Quote:
The Republican party is getting not only meaner and meaner, but dumber and dumber as time goes by.
So what, as long as we get elected and throw your boy out.
I don't think you've ever really seen mean.
Here is an example of what I'm talking about: "Conservatives" take pride in being regarded as getting dumber and dumber.
Like the pot calling the kettle black.
26 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Raptor wrote:
pandabear wrote:
So what, as long as we get elected and throw your boy out.
I don't think you've ever really seen mean.
Quote:
The Republican party is getting not only meaner and meaner, but dumber and dumber as time goes by.
So what, as long as we get elected and throw your boy out.
I don't think you've ever really seen mean.
Here is an example of what I'm talking about: "Conservatives" take pride in being regarded as getting dumber and dumber.
Like the pot calling the kettle black.
Not at all, Dense.
26 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
26 Sep 2011, 12:56 pm
26 Sep 2011, 2:05 pm
Obvious, but he also deleted his post before panda caught it. 
28 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
