Black Gangs Vented Hatred For Whites In Downtown Denver

Post Reply New Topic

Dude, that's weak, you are threatening with insulting me.
What would you gain by insulting me? Have you thought about that?

Colonialism... And why couldn't Africans fight this off? Not enough technology? Why not?
It wasn't because they were unable to wage war, there were internal African conflicts before tyrants came to do businesses with Africans that profited from their own people.

Spears and shields do little against machine guns, even in the hands of the most talented warriors.
The example I gave to LKL did not have improvised statistics.

The proportions show there are more black rapists than white rapists.(or are you going to say this is incorrect?)

Therefore, encountering a black man and a white man means there are more chances that the black man is a rapist.

Now if you actually were raped, and happen to be white, it means you most likely had a white male offender.

But Gould's methods were not those of a scientist in Mismeasure but of someone pushing an agenda while masquerading as one. In that sense the book is crap, pure and simple.

Which sort of contradicts the position that whites don't rape blacks at all...

...and also contradicts the claim that I'm more in danger from a black man than a white man.

...And, think about it: It's been shown that juries are more likely to convict a theoretical black rapist of a white woman than a theoretical white rapist of a black woman, given the same set of circumstances. Those numbers are probably a little weak.

... In terms of overall numbers, there are vastly more white rapists than black rapists because there are vastly more white men than black men.

...they are less likely to be the rapist of a white woman than a white man is.

...Not of white women, which was your[ASPER's] initial claim.

Yes. Look at the numbers. In terms of overall numbers, there are vastly more white rapists than black rapists because there are vastly more white men than black men. Black men are proportionately more likely to be involved in criminal activity, including rape, because they are proportionately more likely to be in poverty - but even given that, they are less likely to be the rapist of a white woman than a white man is.

Not of white women, which was your initial claim.

Finally! It only took, what, two pages of citations to force you to admit that!?

Yes, of white women. I hope that's clear.

Dogs and grizzly bears are totally irrelevant to this topic. Show some human statistics to back up your claims, please - and as the claimant, the onus is upon you to back up your claim, not us to research and support it for you.

what's that Skip? Germany used up most of its gold reserves?

From THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX:
HOW A BANKRUPT GERMANY SOLVED ITS
INFRASTRUCTURE PROBLEMS
Ellen Brown, August 9th, 2007
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bankrupt-germany.php

"We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency [backed by] gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank."
- Adolf Hitler, quoted in "Hitler's Monetary System," www.rense.com, citing C. C. Veith, Citadels of Chaos (Meador, 1949)

… When Hitler came to power, the country was completely, hopelessly broke. The Treaty of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations payments on the German people, who were expected to reimburse the costs of the war for all participants — costs totaling three times the value of all the property in the country. Speculation in the German mark had caused it to plummet, precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. At its peak, a wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of bread. The national treasury was empty, and huge numbers of homes and farms had been lost to the banks and speculators. People were living in hovels and starving. … Germany had no choice but to succumb to debt slavery to international lenders.

Or so it seemed. Hitler and the National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, thwarted the international banking cartel by issuing their own money. In this they took their cue from Abraham Lincoln, who funded the American Civil War with government-issued paper money called "Greenbacks." Hitler began his national credit program by devising a plan of public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. The projected cost of the various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. One billion non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against this cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects, and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. This government-issued money wasn't backed by gold, but it was backed by something of real value. It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced." The workers then spent the Certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved and the country was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. It did this by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits. Germany's economic experiment, like Lincoln's, was short-lived; but it left some lasting monuments to its success, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway.

Hjalmar Schacht, who was then head of the German central bank, is quoted in a bit of wit that sums up the German version of the "Greenback" miracle. An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We've lots of money and that's real banking." Schacht replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's real banking."
…
Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation:
The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.

In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:
Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 and on, accounting for its startling rise from the depression to a world power in 5 years. Germany financed its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of public (government) schools today.

From The Unnecessary War by Patrick Buchanan

…Churchill wrote of Hitler, "Whatever else may be thought about these exploits, they are among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world."' Churchill was referring not only to Hitler's political achievements, but his economic achievements. Before the end of his fourth year in power, Hitler had ended the De¬pression, cut unemployment from six million to one million, grown Germany's GNP by 37 percent, and increased auto production from 45,000 vehicles a year to 250,000.' City and provincial deficits had disappeared. This success goaded Churchill, before Hitler had ever moved on Austria or Czechoslovakia, to confide to American Gen. Robert Wood, at his flat in London in November 1936, "Germany is getting too strong and we must smash her.

From an article by David Lloyd George in the Daily Express, 1936

http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaste ... George.htm

I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods - and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvelous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook.

He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany.
…
There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.

One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, as resolute will and a dauntless heart.

He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against the constant dread of starvation which is one of the most poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world.

The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him an unchallenged authority in modern Germany.

As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolize him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondence and degradation.

To those who have actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany, this description may appear extravagant. All the same it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks the to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.
…
I have never met a happier people than the Germans and Hitler is one of the greatest men.

From The Origins of the Second World War by AJP Taylor

In 1938-39, the last peacetime year, Germany spent on ar¬maments about 15% of her gross national product. The British proportion was almost exactly the same. German expenditure on armaments was actually cut down after Munich and remained at this lower level, so that British production of aeroplanes, for example, was way ahead of German by 1940. When war broke out in 1939, Germany had 1450 modern fighter planes and 800 bombers, Great Britain and France had 950 fighters and 1300 bombers. The Germans had 3500 tanks; Great Britain and France had 3850. In each case Allied intelligence estimated German strength at more than twice the true figure. As usual, Hitler was thought to have planned and prepared for a great war. In fact, he had not.

@ Asper:

Regardless of what that 12% contains, the fact remains that if I'm walking home alone at night, and there's a white guy walking towards me on one side of the street and a black guy walking towards me on the other side of the street, I'm statistically vastly safer if I cross over to the same side as the black guy.

P.S: Check out The Mismeasure of Man by Steven J. Gould for the origin of all of these arguments.

"There is nothing more painful to me ... than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."
Jesse Jackson as quoted in US News & World Report (10 March 1996)

Whenever someone mentions race realist scientists

As for Stephen Jay Gould, he was a self-confessed Marxist.

@ codarac -

erm, exactly how does any of that refute the point made by the Reason article?

And you take seriously the opinion of the man who brought us 'peace in our time' mere moments before a war that would kill tens of millions around the world?

that's spelt 'racist', as in 'racist scientists'



Your point being?