Page 9 of 10 [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

03 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm

Hanotaux wrote:
Also, the fact that many of your troopers will be attempting to storm our positions with their pants worn halfway down on their hips is not going to help your cause. You may recruit some 'gangstas,' but I imagine they will be slowed considerably as their trousers descend about them, and they'll only be able to wield a handgun at best as their left-hand will be thus occupied trying to keep their pants up.

I don't know. I can picture the tea party platoons already. A gaggle of shotgun wielding pear-shaped hillbillies waddling down the streets with their massively protruding beer guts precariously contained within their XXXXL sized overalls. Just don't force them to march too quickly or the bouncing motion of their beer guts may cause their suspenders to break, allowing their already overly-forward center of gravity to pull them flat on their face. Can anyone say FACEPLANT? LOL.

As for the gangstas, well... I'll admit it may be tough to train them not to fire their assault rifles sideways using one hand. However, having the recoil lift directed horizontal rather than vertical might be advantageous considering the wide aspect ratio of the targets. They'll just have to aim for the waistlines.



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

03 Oct 2010, 8:28 pm

marshall wrote:
Hanotaux wrote:
Also, the fact that many of your troopers will be attempting to storm our positions with their pants worn halfway down on their hips is not going to help your cause. You may recruit some 'gangstas,' but I imagine they will be slowed considerably as their trousers descend about them, and they'll only be able to wield a handgun at best as their left-hand will be thus occupied trying to keep their pants up.

I don't know. I can picture the tea party platoons already. A gaggle of shotgun wielding pear-shaped hillbillies waddling down the streets with their massively protruding beer guts precariously contained within their XXXXL sized overalls. Just don't force them to march too quickly or the bouncing motion of their beer guts may cause their suspenders to break, allowing their already overly-forward center of gravity to pull them flat on their face. Can anyone say FACEPLANT? LOL.

As for the gangstas, well... I'll admit it may be tough to train them not to fire their assault rifles sideways using one hand. However, having the recoil lift directed horizontal rather than vertical might be advantageous considering the wide aspect ratio of the targets. They'll just have to aim for the waistlines.

Could you really find that many pinkos that are willing to use a gun and that any hippies willing to come down from their high to fight the tea party? Even if you can you have already proven here that you can't keep it clandestine. I was debating for a while about reporting your posts to the local LASD joint terror task force (who would report it to DHS- I've done it before on another site) but it became clear that your intelligence assessments about guns an the tea party are delusional, your plan is insane, and that you are not mentally competent to carry out such an attack. Seriously, your posts on this thread sound like the musings of an emotionally disturbed 15yo.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Hanotaux
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

03 Oct 2010, 11:04 pm

Quote:
marshall wrote:
Quote:
Hanotaux wrote:
Also, the fact that many of your troopers will be attempting to storm our positions with their pants worn halfway down on their hips is not going to help your cause. You may recruit some 'gangstas,' but I imagine they will be slowed considerably as their trousers descend about them, and they'll only be able to wield a handgun at best as their left-hand will be thus occupied trying to keep their pants up.


I don't know. I can picture the tea party platoons already. A gaggle of shotgun wielding pear-shaped hillbillies waddling down the streets with their massively protruding beer guts precariously contained within their XXXXL sized overalls. Just don't force them to march too quickly or the bouncing motion of their beer guts may cause their suspenders to break, allowing their already overly-forward center of gravity to pull them flat on their face. Can anyone say FACEPLANT? LOL.

As for the gangstas, well... I'll admit it may be tough to train them not to fire their assault rifles sideways using one hand. However, having the recoil lift directed horizontal rather than vertical might be advantageous considering the wide aspect ratio of the targets. They'll just have to aim for the waistlines.

Quote:
Could you really find that many pinkos that are willing to use a gun and that any hippies willing to come down from their high to fight the tea party? Even if you can you have already proven here that you can't keep it clandestine. I was debating for a while about reporting your posts to the local LASD joint terror task force (who would report it to DHS- I've done it before on another site) but it became clear that your intelligence assessments about guns an the tea party are delusional, your plan is insane, and that you are not mentally competent to carry out such an attack. Seriously, your posts on this thread sound like the musings of an emotionally disturbed 15yo
.



I'd not be concerned........... marshall would discover that the hooptiemobiles of the gangstas aren't going to be up to his transport requirements. He forgets that 'Tea Party Platoons' would pretty much be completely mechanized. Besides our complete advantage in weaponry and transport, we'd also have the benefit of being naturally tactically defensive, as Marshall's leftists, as the initiating party, would have the onus of somehow escaping a state of siege in his ghettos.

Besides that, I don't know how often Marshall strolls about racially-changing neighborhoods, but his precious gangstas are starting to get some spare tire and muffin top about the waist, as well as that fat turkey neck. Too much Popeye's chicken methinks............. definitely the porky 'Ruben Studdard/Fat Albert' build is becoming the physical normative for the black populations...... Either that or I see alot more of the effiminate limp-wristed type amongst them. They are definitely starting to look a bit pursy and short winded.

Anyway, I'd not bother reporting Marshall as he's all in good fun. Its probably better the eventual fight comes soon anyway before their birthrate gets completely out of control.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

03 Oct 2010, 11:11 pm

John_Browning wrote:
Could you really find that many pinkos that are willing to use a gun and that any hippies willing to come down from their high to fight the tea party? Even if you can you have already proven here that you can't keep it clandestine. I was debating for a while about reporting your posts to the local LASD joint terror task force (who would report it to DHS- I've done it before on another site) but it became clear that your intelligence assessments about guns an the tea party are delusional, your plan is insane, and that you are not mentally competent to carry out such an attack. Seriously, your posts on this thread sound like the musings of an emotionally disturbed 15yo.

Seriously? You actually think I have "plans"? :lol:

Give me a break. You right wingers use violent rhetoric and macho posturing all the time. You're the same a**holes who shout "kill him" at political rallies, make death threats to democratic congressmen over healthcare reform, yell racial slurs, call gay people "fa***ts", etc... So you like to dish it out but you can't take it?



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

04 Oct 2010, 11:28 am

Interesting new poll out by Gallup. Obama's approval rating is about 45% overall but 91% with blacks and only 36% with whites. Seniors are at 38%, independents are 40%, married people at 39%. Hispanics are at 55% approval, significantly lower than I would of thought.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

04 Oct 2010, 11:45 am

Jacoby wrote:
Hispanics are at 55% approval, significantly lower than I would of thought.


You're kidding, right? More like significantly higher than expected. Hispanic voters are normally conservative.

Also, considering the groups....were the married people all white people or were they black as well or maybe Hispanic too?


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

04 Oct 2010, 11:51 am

skafather84 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Hispanics are at 55% approval, significantly lower than I would of thought.


You're kidding, right? More like significantly higher than expected. Hispanic voters are normally conservative.

Also, considering the groups....were the married people all white people or were they black as well or maybe Hispanic too?


I know that Rove tried to get Hispanics to fill the place of Eastern European immigrants in his attempt to rebuild the Reagan Coalition. Since most rank and file Republicans are rightwing ultranationalists, that didn't work (and is one of the many reasons that ultraconservatives distanced themselves from Bush).

Depending on whether the GOP continues with their anti-Hispanic racism, we might just see a complete realignment of that group into the Democratic column (remember that on issues other than the death penalty African Americans tend to be very socially conservative yet vote Democratic thanks to decades of GOP racism).



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

04 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Hispanics are at 55% approval, significantly lower than I would of thought.


You're kidding, right? More like significantly higher than expected. Hispanic voters are normally conservative.

Also, considering the groups....were the married people all white people or were they black as well or maybe Hispanic too?


Blacks are generally pretty socially conservative too even tho it doesn't translate to votes. I remember Obama's approval rating with Hispanics being around 75% last time I checked. Thought the illegal immigration and Arizona issue would of boosted his support in the community.

I assume majority of the married people were white like the general population but they did not make distinction on the poll.

here's the link to the poll, forgot to post it

http://www.gallup.com/poll/143354/Obama ... m=Politics



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm

Image
Image



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

04 Oct 2010, 2:39 pm

marshall wrote:
Image


I wouldn't laugh at that; that's a Browning M2HB .50 caliber machinegun mounted on the trailer that can reach out several miles and punch holes in engine blocks, while the Barrett M82 .50 caliber sniper rifle mounted on the bike fires the same round and is accurate to around a mile. It may look silly, but that's some serious hardware.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Oct 2010, 3:00 pm

Yea. I'll admit those are scary looking guns. It's the way they're mounted and the fact that someone would decide to show them off in such a manner that's funny.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm

Haha. Apparently John Deere was/is in the war business.

Image

I was trying to look for a photoshopped image of machinegun mounted riding lawnmower.



Hanotaux
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

04 Oct 2010, 7:09 pm

^ Damn, that actually looks like it might be pretty decent for fighting in an urban area...........

+ Plus, the blades underneath can be used for convenient mulching of fallen gangstas.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

04 Oct 2010, 9:23 pm

Check this out...

http://www.adiosbabylon.com/images/LOWRIDER%20TANK.jpg

It's a Lowrider Abrams tank. 100% gangsta.

The Mexican gangstas can be put to work installing the custom hydraulics. The hydraulics could also be used to help the tank maneuver through narrow spots by propping up on one side if needed. I imagine it would also have massive subwoofers installed for blasting rap music at deafening levels.

Your John Deere armored lawnmowers are toast!



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,289
Location: the island of defective toy santas

04 Oct 2010, 9:42 pm

Jacoby wrote:
Interesting new poll out by Gallup. married people at 39%.


what about single people?



Hanotaux
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

04 Oct 2010, 9:54 pm

(edit)



Last edited by Hanotaux on 05 Oct 2010, 2:47 am, edited 1 time in total.