Bethie wrote:
cave_canem wrote:
The fact of the matter is that showing our faces is an intrinsic part of our society and culture.
Nope. It's an intrinsic part of CERTAIN societies and cultures.
Yep, you're right. It's an intrinsic part of the culture in Canada, and other Western nations. You did not disagree with me, and yet the rest of your post makes it seem as though you have?
Bethie wrote:
cave_canem wrote:
I wouldn't presume I could move to a highly conservative country and go to the beach wearing a bikini; I don't presume I'll be allowed into churches if I'm wearing a tank top. Why should someone move to a society where all people show their faces, and expect that they do not have to do the same? This goes for both men and women (although I do not know of any garment that is meant to cover a man's face - does such a thing exist?)
Maybe they expected tolerance and basic freedoms. Silly, I suppose.
Again, with the "if they don't like it they can leave" bit. That does not address the ethical or political justifications or lack thereof, of the ban.
Is it also silly to respect the need to cover one's shoulders when visiting the Vatican? Or should I expect that the Pope welcome me with open arms because he should be tolerant of my basic freedom to wear a tank top?
Maybe people moving to a new country should respect the culture of the country to which they are moving. The knife cuts both ways. I don't understand why I'm being intolerant, or approving of trampling on "basic freedoms", by pointing this out.
Bethie wrote:
I don't like it when people wear short shorts. Guess we should ban those.
Oh god, and Crocks! So ugly. Ban 'em.
If people wore short shorts or Crocks over their faces, I'd agree with you.