Fox News -Still Jerks- want wikipedia to be censored.

Post Reply New Topic

You'll find plenty of innocent Americans die every month simply for reporting shootings and getting shot by the people meant to defend them, or accidental shootings, or by simply being wherever the crime was and police shooting them for it. People also getting shot for committing crimes that are not violent while not being armed.

Going back to this cover art for an album - I'm sure it is illegal in some countries but rest assured if a retailer has it on their shelf, I'm pretty sure it had to pass some legislation to get there. You don't see Marijuana on your top shelf at the grocers, do you?

Are Fox News and the Drudge Report attacking Romney, now? More than they did during the primary elections?

Inuyasha-

The media just didn't attack Romney out of the blue on the 9/11 anniversary (if you really want to call it "attacking" him - reporting is more like it). It was because he had attacked the President for a statement issued nine hours prior to the death of the ambassador - when Romney had earlier promised he'd lay off of politics for the day. If anything, Romney had taken a cheap shot at President Obama for the sake of political gain, by using the death of a good man appointed by the President.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Well thank you for proving you have no idea what you are talking about.

Romney reacted to a series of statements from the US Embassy in Egypt, where they issued a statement sympathizing with the radicals...

Romney waited approximately 16 hours after that intial apology tour by our embassy, then he condemned the statements, and rightfully so.

The Obama camp hadn't bothered to respond to what was going on and let those inexcusable comments stand until after Romney had responded.

At the time Romney's comments had nothing to do with Libya because he had no knowledge that our Ambassador to Libya had been killed or that anything else was going on in Libya (the White House hadn't bothered to provide Romney with the daily intelligence briefings (which Obama hadn't read anyways)).

The real story should have been why the hell hadn't security been beefed up for 9/11/2012 in the first place. Now it has also come out that we had warning about these threats a few days prior to the attack, we also had knowledge about the protests in Egypt in advance.

Kraichgauer, the sad thing is I'm not surprised about your lack of knowledge as to what actually happened.

Romney has absolutely nothing to apologize for, if anyone was being irresponsible it was Obama for deciding to do his Vegas while all of this was going on instead of doing his damn job.

It seems to me that attempting to sympathize with the offended Muslims was a sensible move to try dispelling the crowds. I have yet to hear of any foreknowledge of an Al Qaeda connection by anyone in the embassies or in the government.
And no one can tell me that Romney was motivated first and foremost by election year politics, rather than out of any patriotic notions.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

September 11th pandering and diplomacy is a no brainer for election politics these days.

Dear oh dear...
It's rather like watching a second-rate magician attempting to perform bait-n-switch tricks: no worthwhile content, just a flurry of noise, activity and diversionary tactics.

Inuyasha, you really do need to stop throwing up clouds of equally ridiculous stories in a desperate attempt to derail the conversation, just so you can find even more excuses to attack "the left", "liberals" and basically anything else you don't much like the sound of.

You are a Fox News shill and I claim my $10.

Fox is obviously very busy doing damage control for the Romney campaign.

Which is a bit of a puzzler: Romney still speaks French, and his father was still born in Mexico, and he was still the architect for Romneycare. Why doesn't Fox tell its peasants to vote for one of the minor candidates, with less tarnished Conservative credentials?

Here is another one:

http://news.yahoo.com/joke-photo-fox-su ... 54000.html

Fox is absolutely desperate to find new ways to smear the president.

No, you actually owe me $10.

Cornflake, you one thing Obama managed to succeed in doing, he got both my parents to start to listen to Rush Limbaugh.

Cornflake as you well know people on the spectrum (you and I included), are not very good at recognizing when they are being lied to. However, unlike you (and about everyone else here) my mother was a speech pathologist, I was taught to look at multiple sources and not believe everything I read, I learned to pick up subtle cues, and most of all I'm probably better at recognizing when someone is giving fact, opinion, or just plain B.S. than you are.

On the wikipedia garbage, there are some things you really have to consider.
1. Fox News would have had no motive to make up a story about wikipedia like that; while wikipedia would have a motive to try to sweep it under the rug.

2. We had the wikipedia co-founder making the allegations. Not sure how wikipedia works from a financial standpoint, but it wouldn't surprise me if the co-founder of wikipedia had some financial claim to wikipedia, so reporting this arguably hurt his bottom line.

3. After the initial story, wikipedia would have a motive to try to sweep this under the rug and try to smear Fox News. The left wing media already has a motive to try to smear Fox News.


Fact of the matter is, what you are asserting makes absolutely no sense...

Have you ever bothered listening to Rush for 6 weeks, probably not cause if you did, I wouldn't be surprised if you began to find yourself agreeing with me.

If anyone listened to Limbaugh for six weeks straight, they'd probably start agreeing with you - it's called brainwashing.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

When he makes advertisements for specific pundits like this he gets $10 for the post instead of the regular $1.50

In your case, who'd notice, cause you're already brainwashed...

Seriously, listen to Limbaugh, do your own research and start connecting the dots. Right now the fact you've never listened to Limbaugh for yourself but take other people's statements for granted, actually demonstrates that you may actually be brainwashed Kraichgauer.

I had to put up with NPR while I was out near DC for 2 months, because that's what the shuttle bus driver liked listening to. I didn't become more liberal after listening to NPR for 2 months, in fact I became more Conservative.

I have listened to that blowhard back when I was in college. My Dad's car only had a sucky am radio, and his news station, which he had listened to religiously, had been hijacked by right wing nuts (those were the Reagan years, after all). And so, along with programs run by John Birchers and fundies,there was also Rush Limbaugh. And listening to the guy, I only was hardened in my conviction that Limbaugh was an overbearing, hurtful loudmouth who blamed those without for the world's problems, but climbed up the rich man's ass. I even remember Limbaugh's short lived show on TV - I watched that in order to try understanding the other side of the aisle's point of view. Instead, it only made me more of a left wing partisan.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer

Let me guess you were a Jimmy Carter supporter...

Many people who hate Jimmy Carter misunderstand macroeconomics. Carter didn't control world oil prices (which contributed to Stagflation), OPEC did.

Do you understand macroeconomics?

Jimmy Carter also deregulated the airline industry, something American right-wingers should be ecstatic about - if so many of them weren't also brain-dead GOP shills.

How old do you think I am? I was a kid back during the Carter years! But my parents certainly supported him.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer