When I was growing up in rural Australia I had to ride on a different bus and use different computers because the Indigenous Australian children had their own services. There was one women there as a support worker, who did not really like her job that much (and had no qualification for it anyway), used to call in bomb threats on the school. The average was one a week, as a result she would get the day off of work. In the end she was apprehended and fired.
People who try cookie cutter solutions to race relations find their efforts stymied by the rather more complicated reality into which they are applied. It reminds me of the Tianxia method of imperial Chinese rule. The idea was, that civilisation was at its peak in the capital, therefor when a solution that worked in the capital was applied to the provinces failed, it was because the outer area was too barbarian. The solution was to try and make it more like the capital. It is how, to this day, that in the outer regions of China the street signs still do not make sense as they are translated into local languages by people in Beijing. Race relations and privilege cannot be solved in this way either. If an idea works in the city, it may not work in the country. It might have external effects that are impossible to predict or quantify. The best advice you can go on is to treat each person as the come, one at a time. Race and presumption of privilege can only be resolved person to person, it takes a radical change of heart to get there and it cannot be indoctrinated into a person. But our forbears have suggested a place to start, in the radical proposition, that even a reprehensible bigot at the top, fully of privileges they do not recognise, is worthy of love and has a soul.
_________________
Life is real ! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal ;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.