Are there really more "mass shootings" in the U.S.?

Post Reply New Topic

Exactly! That is supposed to be the great thing about our country.

They already did it under Obama and it was only stopped cause trump. States are trying to do it and do worse things.
Wanting ones rights to be determined by a psychologist is horrible. MOst of them are anti gun and lots don’t think aspire should own guns.
They aren’t just saying it though they pushing legislation to enact such policies. In my state all it takes is an ex or someone saying you had sex with them that your dangerous and they take your guns for a year or more, now they expanding it to allow include coworkers. So some coworker is like man sly si so why he must be future mass shooter and tells police so then come and take my guns. Now it’s up to me to prove I’m innocent which cost lots of money I don’t have and they know that. So I’m branded dangerous and have no rights and there’s nothing that can doo all off the word of someone I work with.
Then there’s the simi auto ban they almost go through and are already pushing it for our state congress and if not for 2020. A bill that even the liberal court who always sides anti gun said it was illegally worded and confusing. Mean when their own biases court says it’s bad that should tell you something.
Then there’s California god help any gun owner living there. Meanwhile the atf made bumpstocks illegal and any other rate of fire increasing device.
Some racist can have their opinion but I’m sure we’d all freak out when they start to push legislation and it gains traction.
I live in a liberal state unlike you(for now) so it’s very likely a simi auto ban will be passed this coming year, they control our state congress and the dem governor demands it, it per usually I’ll be passed under a clause of emergency which disallows the people from voting to remove it. Year again what’s the state emergency? It was suppose to be used in events of war or natature disasters but they use it to get whatever horrible law they want through.

So I won’t calm down or relax they are winning here and once they get control of federal congress and the White House they be winning federally which will effect you too

Also since your siding with him
Are you then saying I don’t have free speech to say what I said? Cause that’s how it seems to sound from two of you.
Nothing I said violates his free speech.
Free speech works both ways.

Yup

It’s ironic that you both shouting free speech while simultaneously telling me j can’t say something. Seems to imply you don’t think I have free speech and that that rights selective.

I wrote: "Americans have free speech rights to say such things." I specifically didn't focus on anyone.

Oh I think you have the right to your opinion and to free speech. I just don't like you.

Now I'm expressing my free speech to say that I'm ending this arguement before it turns into an elementary school level of childish name calling.

I just have to say it : The «best» thing about this «country» right now is the fact that it has the highest concentration of «conspiracy theorists» amongst its population in the entire world who expose government-corruption.

I disagree I think the best thing about our country is the chocolate chip cookie. Definitely the chocolate chip cookie! Without us it would have never been invented.

Well I don’t don’t like you.
I don’t name call people.

Not hard enough. There's a REASON why more and more videos like this are being produced...
I also support gun-control; provided that said control is for cops who need to become unarmed and peaceful with their communities anyway (rather than the current «war-mongering» mentality). If they weren't such a threat to the general public then they simply would not be «targeted» by irate «victims» of their abuses. The job of a uniformed PEACE-officer would then become one of THE most respected and «honourable» jobs to have in all of society.

Without cops criminals would go around killing, raping, and stealing from people and nobody would be able to stop them.

An unarmed cop makes about as much sense as a car without an engine.

Just how ridiculously indoctrinated are you ? Anyway, the REAL «statistics» beg to differ. There is actually LESS crime in places without forceful government-mafias. Crimes would actually become a «thing of the past» IF the benign rehabilitation program of The Messiah's design (his Feeling Easier Seminar) were to be implemented in this and every land world-wide in accordance to The Testament of Truth parameters.

I'm sorry but I think you are completely full of crap.

Projection much from you. Just because you choose to ignore the «evidence» does not make said evidence disappear. Women are actually much more likely to be «raped» by a cop in this modern-day Nazi-Germany style age than any so-called terrorist-group (unless they're located in Sweden).

Cops even from the local town where I live at have been convicted of raping female hostages/inmates (speaking of convicting cops I'm building up more paper-work to sue their asses for their TREASON). Think that it's beyond a cop to behave so reprehensibly ? Take the case of TAUNYA PERRY vs TERRY DURBOROW, Case No. 17-5023, filed with the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, June 12, 2018 (Appeal D.C. No. 4:15-CV-00095-CVE-FHM). This is a case of a woman who brought suit due to being raped at a jail by a cop. I am also reminded of the fact that one of the local jailers at my current town-location also ended up slamming the door on a girl after putting her into the «drunk tank» (isolation-room) which caught one or two of her fingers as the door closed which ended sending at least one of her fingers ending up «flying» onto the floor (this happened a couple of years ago).

Cops are also literally «getting away with MURDER» on a practically DAILY basis because they think that there are NO consequences for their «barbaric» actions due to so-called «qualified immunity» defense.

Crime cannot be «reduced» by committing those same crimes against others under colour of law.

Unfortunately, law-enforcement agencies in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (involving Connecticut, New York and Vermont) are allowed to decline employing officers based on their "high IQs" <https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836>.

I know many Wrong Planteteers say that IQ means nothing, but this is real-world application of a very stupid idea where split-second decisions must be made day in, day out. But, hey, It saves the Second Circuit agencies a ton of money!

I imagine it's gotta be tough being a cop. I definitely could never be one.

And I definitely couldn't be a security guard or a soldier either.