ironpony wrote:
Yeah that makes sense. What if the courts didn't have plea bargains and you had to go trial though and that was your only choice? Would that be better?
It's hard to say. I know when I had to deal with a criminal charge I would have been forced to plead guilty despite being innocent if it wasn't for my parents being willing to help out. The sad thing is, both outcomes had similar financial burdens, but because you're not actually given free council unless prison time is an outcome (in Canada) it basically is a trap because if you can't afford to defend yourself you will be forced to cooperate with being railroaded.
Interestingly I learned that Canada has multiple options for 'pleading down' a first-time impaired operation charge if alcohol was the causative substance, but not if any other substance was indicated. Also, failing a sobriety test is grounds even if no substances are note, but further that even when substances are found that by itself doesn't indicate intoxication. So basically a sketchy weirdo who struggles to understand instructions can be charged with impaired with no actual evidence, just for the lulz? The judge suggested an acquittal before my lawyer was done going through the Crown's 'evidence'.
Unrelated to that, you might appreciate this story regarding Breonna Taylor's killing since it refutes points that some anti-BLM posters have been claiming as gospel truth for weeks now:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v7gw ... in-the-leg
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.