What to do with anti-vax/anti-maskers...
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,547
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Since they're making a lifestyle choice that raises their risk of dying or facing significant medical bills it would seem fair that insurance companies can raise their rates on the unvaccinated, no?
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Double Retired
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,836
Location: U.S.A. (Mid-Atlantic)
There appears to be a precedent in the U.S.:
HealthMarkets Insurance Agency: "What You Need to Know About Smoking and Health Insurance"
_________________
When diagnosed I bought champagne!
I finally knew why people were strange.

HealthMarkets Insurance Agency: "What You Need to Know About Smoking and Health Insurance"
_________________
86 the 46
Don't tread on me!
No aid or comfort to the liberals. No way.
My rights don't end where your feeeelings begin!
Then they came for me. But by then, there was no one left to object.
If you're conservative when you're young, you have no heart! If you're liberal when you're mature, you have no brain!
^^^ I can't speak for anyone else, but in my observation the pandemic is brought out the worst in a lot of people, driving them into self-righteous corners they will battle to the death to defend. Examples can be found on both sides of any debate.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Here are the spelling rules:
* For illnesses other than Biden-19, the spelling "pandemic" is correct.
* For Biden-19 specifically, the spelling "scamdemic" is correct.
"Scamdemic" is pronounced as "pandemic". However, some people spell it phonetically, which is wrong, and has to stop.
_________________
86 the 46
Don't tread on me!
No aid or comfort to the liberals. No way.
My rights don't end where your feeeelings begin!
Then they came for me. But by then, there was no one left to object.
If you're conservative when you're young, you have no heart! If you're liberal when you're mature, you have no brain!
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,547
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I don't recall anyone cheering for looters or arsonists even if many people cheered for the social justice cause that some criminals exploited while committing those acts.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
Here are the spelling rules:
* For illnesses other than Biden-19, the spelling "pandemic" is correct.
* For Biden-19 specifically, the spelling "scamdemic" is correct.
"Scamdemic" is pronounced as "pandemic". However, some people spell it phonetically, which is wrong, and has to stop.
Can I say something? The loss of life I PERSONALLY KNOW OF makes it quite clear this is not a "scamdemic," but a true pandemic. The number of people infected that I PERSONALLY KNOW OF also makes it quite clear this is not a "scandemic " but a pandemic. I am left with ZERO PATIENCE for the types of claims you are making in this post. ZERO.
Consider it a luxury that life hasn't forced you to stare the facts dead on in the face, but stop trying to gas-light the rest of the world. The scam is on the denial side, not on the believer side. I'm all for personal choices, trying to live together, etc., but when people insist on denying the reality of other people's pain and difficulty, that where I draw the line. You are LITERALLY CAUSING PAIN to people with the gas-lighting. Just, STOP.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
I don't recall anyone cheering for looters or arsonists even if many people cheered for the social justice cause that some criminals exploited while committing those acts.
Agreed. Most of the left was very quick to say protests needed to stay peaceful and to condemn violence.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Double Retired
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,836
Location: U.S.A. (Mid-Atlantic)
_________________
86 the 46
Don't tread on me!
No aid or comfort to the liberals. No way.
My rights don't end where your feeeelings begin!
Then they came for me. But by then, there was no one left to object.
If you're conservative when you're young, you have no heart! If you're liberal when you're mature, you have no brain!
I think you can effectively decry the shut downs and social distancing measures without using a term like scamdemic and trying to deny the reality of the virus. It doesn't have to be one or the other, that it's either your reality or ours. The legitimacy of social shut down measures as a response to the pandemic is a fair debate topic, I am not going to claim otherwise. But it can be done without denying the reality of other's people's experiences. Do you see my point?
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,547
Location: Right over your left shoulder
At least one guy who was charged and who Fox News held up as an example of a rioter who tried to murder cops was later acquitted because it was proven he was returning fire in self-defence on an unmarked van that opened fire on him.
Edit: His name is Jaleel Stallings.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
funeralxempire
Veteran

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,547
Location: Right over your left shoulder
I'm not sure people hate you, they just strongly disagree with your message.
Does living in California somehow make their views less valid or less well-informed, or are you just trying to avoid further discussion with someone who's been very patient while refuting most of your claims?
Why does it matter where WP is based? Are the mods based out of CA? Are they paid to align themselves with anything or are they unpaid volunteers located in many places that aren't CA?
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.
I'm not sure people hate you, they just strongly disagree with your message.
Does living in California somehow make their views less valid or less well-informed, or are you just trying to avoid further discussion with someone who's been very patient while refuting most of your claims?
Why does it matter where WP is based? Are the mods based out of CA? Are they paid to align themselves with anything or are they unpaid volunteers located in many places that aren't CA?
Before the debate gets out of hand any further, I think we all need to back it up a moment. I realize that I changed the tone of the conversation first, and Apsie1 was responding in kind. I would rather deescalate, and will give it a shot in my next post.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).