Well I guess Israel and Iran are at war now.

Page 9 of 9 [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

cyberdora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,911
Location: Australia

22 Jun 2025, 3:44 am

Iran has a choice. Demilitarise and give up their Chinese made weapons of death.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,158
Location: Right over your left shoulder

22 Jun 2025, 2:41 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Huh? Saying that comparing US’ democracy to Iran’s political system is a stretch is now “strawmanning” .

This is a clear, defensible opinion, not a distortion of someone else's argument.

What is strawmanning to you?


No one has claimed that the US and Iran's political systems were comparable, so your choice to argue against that claim is strawmanning.

And since so much of your arguing is based on distortions and responding to arguments that were never made in the first place, it's fair to dismiss your arguments as nonsense.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,381
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Jun 2025, 3:05 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Huh? Saying that comparing US’ democracy to Iran’s political system is a stretch is now “strawmanning” .

This is a clear, defensible opinion, not a distortion of someone else's argument.

What is strawmanning to you?


No one has claimed that the US and Iran's political systems were comparable, so your choice to argue against that claim is strawmanning.

And since so much of your arguing is based on distortions and responding to arguments that were never made in the first place, it's fair to dismiss your arguments as nonsense.


It's an argument that was explicitly made by Matchbox.

He said:

“The US Presidency is more or less fixed the same way that the Iranian Presidency is.”

""The only difference is whether it's a figure that we can identify, or it's a bunch of oligarchs that mostly try to remain hidden.""

“This whole business of suggesting that they [Iran] don’t have a real government or that their votes don’t matter at all is a bunch of lies.”

These are explicit claims he made that can be interpreted as:

- The U.S. presidency is no more democratic than Iran’s.
- It’s dishonest to suggest Iran is a non-democracy or its elections are far more meaningless than the US's elections.
- He’s acknowledging a difference, but it's a minor one in his view: visibility of control (Ayatollah vs. oligarchs).

This is a direct comparison between the two systems - suggesting equivalence in electoral manipulation and elite control.

I disagreed with that and called it a stretch, it is comparing apples with oranges. That’s not strawmanning - it’s engaging with what was actually said.

If you're now saying no one compared the systems, then you're contradicting what Matchbox wrote, not me.

Disagree with my take all you want - but at least be accurate about what’s being argued.


MatchboxVagabond wrote:

Nonsense. The US Presidency is more or less fixed the same way that the Iranian Presidency is. The only difference is whether it's a figure that we can identify, or it's a bunch of oligarchs that mostly try to remain hidden. The Democrats haven't even bothered to let the primary voters choose the candidate since 2008 and even then it was just because they couldn't rig things quickly enough to stop Obama from taking the primary.

This whole business of suggesting that they don't have a real government or that their votes don't matter at all is a bunch of lies. Yes, I would like to see them have more of a say in their own governance, but it's intellectually dishonest to suggest that there isn't at least some agency of the voters in terms of the range of options on offer, even if it is a narrow range.



MatchboxVagabond
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Mar 2023
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,326

22 Jun 2025, 8:26 pm

cyberdora wrote:
MatchboxVagabond wrote:
The fact of the matter is that Israel is the problem here, they're the ones that refuse to accept offers to address their claimed concerns about security and have gone about attacking countries with reckless disregard for the legality or necessity of it.


I don't dispute Israel and the US aren't manipulating the news either to justify the strikes. the first casualty of war is the truth. but if a nuclear Iran are a long term danger then neutralising their capabilities will at least keep the region safe.

You criticise me for lacking ethics but I am only interested in keeping my family safe (like everyone else). The U.S.-Australia alliance is an anchor for peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and around the world. Both countries share a strong interest in maintaining freedom. For me a safe world needs a strong US and Israel is > strong China, north Korea, Iran and warmongering Arab states.

I guess I'm just a better person then. I grew up with the guilt of coming from a country that engaged in extensive genocide during WWII and grew up in a country that engaged in genocide both in Europe and here in the US against my people. I guess some people have the benefit of not having to grow up with that kind of a weight around their neck.

Ethnic cleansing is not one of those trades that ever works out. It is as close as imaginable to a literal deal with the devil. Right, now you think this is "just about protecting your friends and family" but that's always how it is. They never start these ethnic cleansing campaigns without claiming that it's necessary for national security or that these people are actually decent people. They tell people that they're not like you and that they are a threat to your safety. And they get away with it because gullible fools are willing to spread the propaganda without any critical thinking.

Iran hadn't attacked Israel and Iran had chosen to make serious efforts to deescalate the situation. Israel has at every turn escalated things and backed Iran into the corner. Personally, I'm well aware that Iran isn't perfect, but by the same token, This is literally happening because people like you continue to spread lies and propaganda. Iran has largely kept to itself in terms of wars. The days of the Persian Empire are in the past and the people mostly don't have the sort of ambition to grow massively large that some other countries do.

If they get a nuke, it's going to because they had no other choice.



MatchboxVagabond
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Mar 2023
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,326

22 Jun 2025, 8:36 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Huh? Saying that comparing US’ democracy to Iran’s political system is a stretch is now “strawmanning” .

This is a clear, defensible opinion, not a distortion of someone else's argument.

What is strawmanning to you?


No one has claimed that the US and Iran's political systems were comparable, so your choice to argue against that claim is strawmanning.

And since so much of your arguing is based on distortions and responding to arguments that were never made in the first place, it's fair to dismiss your arguments as nonsense.

In all fairness, I was comparing the countries governments to an extent. But, I do think that the governments are more similar than what a lot of people suggest. The Ayatollah does have a lot of weight in that he's effectively a king of sorts. But, the devil is in the details and while I do think the two countries do leave a lot to be desired in terms of the actual governance, there is a fair amount that the two countries have in common, like being able to elect some positions, having some positions be unelected and a bunch of the differences come down to the actual people and what they'll consent to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_ ... stitutions

I do think that the way that works isn't completely dissimilar. Sure, there are definitely a lot of problems, but right now, the US itself has massive problems that aren't entirely dissimilar to what Iran has going on.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,158
Location: Right over your left shoulder

Yesterday, 1:04 pm

Well, the hawks have won and there's another disasterous war in the middle east.

Americans are going to waste a bunch of blood and treasure on accomplishing nothing of value and nothing of actual benefit to their nation.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,583

Yesterday, 1:09 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Well, the hawks have won and there's another disasterous war in the middle east.

Americans are going to waste a bunch of blood and treasure on accomplishing nothing of value and nothing of actual benefit to their nation.


The American military industrial complex gets to demonstrate its worth by blowing crap up, don't forget. :roll:



Barchan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 882

Yesterday, 1:38 pm

cyberdora wrote:
Iran has a choice. Demilitarise

Why? The IDF are some of the most ruthless heartless sadists ever spawned from the depths of Hell, who in their right mind would ever let down their guard with those godless sociopaths running amok?



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,158
Location: Right over your left shoulder

Yesterday, 1:42 pm

Barchan wrote:
cyberdora wrote:
Iran has a choice. Demilitarise

Why? The IDF are some of the most ruthless heartless sadists ever spawned from the depths of Hell, who in their right mind would ever let down their guard with those godless sociopaths running amok?


Apparently the right to self-defence only applies when simps for Israel approve of it.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
If you feel useless, just remember the USA took four presidents, thousands of lives, trillions of dollars and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban.


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,381
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

Today, 6:57 am

funeralxempire wrote:
Well, the hawks have won and there's another disasterous war in the middle east.

Americans are going to waste a bunch of blood and treasure on accomplishing nothing of value and nothing of actual benefit to their nation.


Well, you still owe me an apology for falsly accusing me of strawmanning (arguing about something no one argued about); Matchbox has just proved that himself.

It is better not to keep embarrassing yourself with this false accusation.

And no, apparently the US won’t be involved in another ME war; both sides (US and Iran) seem to have bombed emptied locations, not sure what the end game is.
It seems to be all a ploy for saving face or for leverage.
You have the right of being upset for wasting money.