Atheists: Is stealing wrong? If so, explain why.

Page 9 of 13 [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Zyborg
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

28 Dec 2008, 1:03 pm

Agreed that the access to the planet's resources should be distributed evenly.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

28 Dec 2008, 1:08 pm

Sand wrote:
Property is a communal concept instituted for communal purposes. It is somewhat derived from the territorial instincts possessed by most creatures including plants to claim and use the offerings of any territory and prevent their use by an invader. It has nothing to do with religion.
But it is equally stupid.

Not like I would like people to steal from me, but it is stupid, this whole sense of property has started so many wars...


_________________
.


Zyborg
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 459

28 Dec 2008, 1:12 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
Sand wrote:
Property is a communal concept instituted for communal purposes. It is somewhat derived from the territorial instincts possessed by most creatures including plants to claim and use the offerings of any territory and prevent their use by an invader. It has nothing to do with religion.
But it is equally stupid.

Not like I would like people to steal from me, but it is stupid, this whole sense of property has started so many wars...


That is agreed to.

We need an alternative.

http://thevenusproject.com
http://technocracynet.eu



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Dec 2008, 1:16 pm

slowmutant wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
What really justifies ownership? Should other people suffer so others can hoard possessions and land they don't really need.


No. Ideally, the planet's wealth & resources would be distributed evenly.

If I buy something, it belongs to me only insofar as I have purchased it. When the white man first came to North America and "bought" the ancestral homeland of our Native peoples, was there a legitimate change of ownership? I think not, seeing as how it was an offer the Indians literally couldn't refuse.


If you buy something do you really check its origin? Do you know who was involved in it production? Maybe it could have been made with child labour/sweat shop.


I'm not an idealist, but there is problem with the no steal rule. Even legitimately the idea of ownership and value resets the balance of things. It can make people poor by association.

Khoisian tribes in Africa might not be considered poor, they won't stave so long as the Nambib desert and surrounding savannah is not destroyed. They are hunter gathers exclusively, no agriculture. They do trade with Bantu tribes. They don't have money per say, then just make Jewellery ostrich eggs, etc which they have done for centuries. As they are very good at finding food either hunting meat or vegetables, they actually spend the majority of their time relaxing. They cost the countries they live in nothing and maintain the habitats.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

28 Dec 2008, 1:22 pm

Oh sure, if there were no such thing as ownership, theft would not be a crime and you could snatch things away from other people at will. Yet another excuse to do whatever you want. Yet another way to get around the rules.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Oh sure, if there were no such thing as ownership, theft would not be a crime and you could snatch things away from other people at will. Yet another excuse to do whatever you want. Yet another way to get around the rules.

You misunderstand the problem is with the people doing the owning, they don't care how their "ownership" effects others. They really don't understand property or money they just know they can buy pretty much anything.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Dec 2008, 1:38 pm

Stealing take many form for instance bullying country so they can’t use protectionism, yet using protectionism in your own country. That is not really different from stealing.

There is great land grab at the moment, where countries are baying up agricultural land because they don't have fertile land themselves. They are not going the pay the less off countries for their produce only take, and there will be less fertile land left over for their country’s population.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Dec 2008, 1:46 pm

Some people show glimers of being perceptive, but then it just falls back down to simplistic thinking i.e. see no evil, hear no evil, it doesn't have anything to do with me type thing.



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

28 Dec 2008, 5:23 pm

Does the OP ever return to his own topics?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

29 Dec 2008, 2:36 am

Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


well even if I don't obay the stupid christian laws
I do believe in Canada's laws



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 8:16 am

Kilroy wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As a Christian, I do believe stealing is wrong, but I also believe that, from an atheistic/evolutionary standpoint, stealing can be justified just as strongly as it can be attacked. What do you think?


well even if I don't obay the stupid christian laws
I do believe in Canada's laws


In Canada, theft is unlawful.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

29 Dec 2008, 8:35 am

if an organism benefits from what it did not contribute to, then it is a parasite.

a world populated by parasites can not produce the nurture that parasites require.

there must be nourishing producers that parasites freeload and feed from.

i provide things to steal for wastrels who are in a torpid inertia. they are useless and they need to steal from me so they can eat and reproduce and produce more bacterial replications of themselves.

thieves are parasites.
they are like fleas who steal the blood from my ankles. i love innocent animals, but i have no mercy for fleas.
i experienced fleas once.

i did not feel any mercy toward them. i ended each fleas life with satisfaction during that plague.

they are my enemies.
people who take what they did not earn are just like fleas.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 9:18 am

I couldn't have said it better myself! :thumright:



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Dec 2008, 9:21 am

But even parasites have a place in nature, do they not?

Do they?



ed
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2004
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: Whitinsville, MA

29 Dec 2008, 9:38 am

...so you two are saying that we should institute the death penalty for stealing? :roll:



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

29 Dec 2008, 9:43 am

ed wrote:
...so you two are saying that we should institute the death penalty for stealing? :roll:


huh?
i said nothing of that nature.