auntblabby wrote:
Down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. That path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. It is a certain route to failure[/i]."
This past March, I won the "Best of Show" award for a mixed-media painting in an art gallery exhibit.
How? I worked for it.
Also, the painting sold.
The art gallery owner encouraged anyone who sold a painting in her show
to donate part of the proceeds to charity.
Since it was a worthy charity that I believed in, I donated.
Next March, there's a good chance I'll pay the entry fee to submit new artwork.
There's also an excellent chance that I won't win a thing next year,
and selling a painting is not guaranteed.
In any case, I'll be very happy just to participate as one of the artists.
Meanwhile, there was no chaos when I had an advantage over others in the art gallery,
and I foresee no chaos next year when someone will else have an advantage over me by winning
and others may have an advantage over me by the sales they make.
I will be happy for whoever wins, admire the talent of those who sell their art,
and maybe secretly wish I could be the one to buy their jewelry, sculpture, fabric, photo, or painting.
In fact, I recently attended a gallery opening focusing exclusively on the work of two artists
and made a minor purchase of greeting cards from one of them.
Which reminds me, I need to send out one of the cards to my sister for her birthday ...
So basically, I benefited from the artist who sold her work to me
and she benefited from me buying her work, which is beautiful.
That's an example of win-win,
a real-world example showing the beauty of free market capitalism right there.
Many small businesses are run by actual real people like me and the other artist.
As an artist, I thrive on freedom.