Is there any proof God exists?
Lintar wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
There is no god, no magical man so grow the hell up and see reality, when you die nothing happens it is nothing no afterlife no nothing so enjoy the life you have while you can improve yourself and get a great job and be happy until you die of old age, regret nothing!Without the fear of an imaginary invisible bearded man who has insecurity issues and is a fascist dictating your life you are free,you have free will! Only the religious have no free will regardless of their imaginary friend saying they have free will they do not they are under control and not free!You fail to heed my advice youll end uplike these guys! God didnt create the internet, man did and if he exists he has no control over the internet he is weak a coward and obsolete compared to man if he does but yet he does not exist!
I don't believe in a 'magical man' either. This is yet one more attempt by an atheist to deliberately misrepresent what theists really do believe, in order to demolish the proverbial strawman and then be able to claim yet another false victory in the imaginary 'war' between science and religion.Theism is a waste of time and emotion, there is no god there are no angels and there is no afterlife! God is not realif he was he is dead and useless!
So unbelievably lame.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Last edited by AspieOtaku on 01 Apr 2015, 2:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
AspieOtaku wrote:
Lintar wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
There is no god, no magical man so grow the hell up and see reality, when you die nothing happens it is nothing no afterlife no nothing so enjoy the life you have while you can improve yourself and get a great job and be happy until you die of old age, regret nothing!Without the fear of an imaginary invisible bearded man who has insecurity issues and is a fascist dictating your life you are free,you have free will! Only the religious have no free will regardless of their imaginary friend saying they have free will they do not they are under control and not free!You fail to heed my advice youll end uplike these guys! God didnt create the internet, man did and if he exists he has no control over the internet he is weak a coward and obsolete compared to man if he does but yet he does not exist!
I don't believe in a 'magical man' either. This is yet one more attempt by an atheist to deliberately misrepresent what theists really do believe, in order to demolish the proverbial strawman and then be able to claim yet another false victory in the imaginary 'war' between science and religion.
So unbelievably lame.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
Lintar wrote:
I don't believe in a 'magical man' either. This is yet one more attempt by an atheist to deliberately misrepresent what theists really do believe
From what I understand you believe this
Lintar wrote:
God isn't just responsible for the 'Big Bang' of creation, but for every single moment of that creation, everywhere. God 'sustains in existence' reality, as they might say; it forms the ultimate foundation for it. Absent the existence of God, there would really be nothing at all.
So as far as I am concerned you do believe in a "Magical Man" You can argue that God is not a man, but heck that is splitting hairs. You believe in a Being that controls every single interaction of this universe. Extrapolating from "for every single moment of that creation" then seeing as life is still evolving on earth and stars and galaxies are continuing to change, then it is reasonable to assume that you also believe that God is responsible for the weather, and the patterns of weather that allow us to predict what god is going to do over the next 7 days.
The problem with your 'Philosophy and logic over the scientific method and the predictions from science" being that you start with a potentially flawed premise.
Lintar wrote:
Absent the existence of God, there would really be nothing at all.
As I understand your argument you are using the above statement to deny the predictions of front-line science that point to things such as multiple universes. From your stand point the prediction of such things is falsified by the axiom "God the creator exists and this god is the creator and curator of all there is"
Which is a nonsense.
Unlike you, most atheists are quite prepared to say "I do not know how this universe came into being, but rather than say God did it I will continue looking for an answer, which may (although I highly doubt it) lead to god" You on the other hand make the completely unreasonable assumption that you know how the universe came into being and you know where all the laws of nature came from.
You continuously berate atheists for being philosophically unsound, I contend that it is you, not I, who has a very shaky philosophical base.
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
sophisticated wrote:
Canadian1911 wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
There are also events that are probabilistic and not deterministic, such as radioactive decay. That just functions outside of causality (or maybe it has a cause that we have not yet been able to identify). Perhaps universes pop into existence in a probabilistic way, there is just no way to know right now. And to continue on my train of unfounded thought: perhaps universes cause other universes to exist. That could possibly explain the finely-tuned universe, as finely-tuned universes may be better at causing new universes to exist. Of course there is zero evidence for this, it's just something I was thinking of a while ago.
Maybe you don't want God in your life.
Dodging the question, plus your implying he is just disbelieving in presence of evidence - which he is not, he is disbelieving in absence of evidence.
Sometimes, we see what we want to see.
Full agreement here; however, perhaps this applies to yourself as well?
izzeme wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
Canadian1911 wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
There are also events that are probabilistic and not deterministic, such as radioactive decay. That just functions outside of causality (or maybe it has a cause that we have not yet been able to identify). Perhaps universes pop into existence in a probabilistic way, there is just no way to know right now. And to continue on my train of unfounded thought: perhaps universes cause other universes to exist. That could possibly explain the finely-tuned universe, as finely-tuned universes may be better at causing new universes to exist. Of course there is zero evidence for this, it's just something I was thinking of a while ago.
Maybe you don't want God in your life.
Dodging the question, plus your implying he is just disbelieving in presence of evidence - which he is not, he is disbelieving in absence of evidence.
Sometimes, we see what we want to see.
Full agreement here; however, perhaps this applies to yourself as well?
It does not apply to me.
I have proven the existence of God right here on this thread.
Remember, this thread is about Gods existence, we are not discussing His nature, his location, why created us etc.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Oldavid wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
Remember, this thread is about Gods existence, we are not discussing His nature, his location, why created us etc.
Exactly! Well noted and timely put.Straw men and red herrings are supplied gratis to emotionally charged obscurantists.
Don't forget goalpost-moving. Proof has been provided, so the next argument is "that's not proof," and some unreasonable standard for proof that only supports the opposing view will be demanded.
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
AngelRho wrote:
Oldavid wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
Remember, this thread is about Gods existence, we are not discussing His nature, his location, why created us etc.
Exactly! Well noted and timely put.Straw men and red herrings are supplied gratis to emotionally charged obscurantists.
Don't forget goalpost-moving. Proof has been provided, so the next argument is "that's not proof," and some unreasonable standard for proof that only supports the opposing view will be demanded.
My my, this is a first. What goal post moving and what Proofs have been provided?
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
AngelRho wrote:
Oldavid wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
Remember, this thread is about Gods existence, we are not discussing His nature, his location, why created us etc.
Exactly! Well noted and timely put.Straw men and red herrings are supplied gratis to emotionally charged obscurantists.
Don't forget goalpost-moving. Proof has been provided, so the next argument is "that's not proof," and some unreasonable standard for proof that only supports the opposing view will be demanded.
My my, this is a first. What goal post moving and what Proofs have been provided?
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
sophisticated wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
I have proven the existence of God right here on this thread.
Nope. You've proven that you believe in uncausable causes.
You cannot argue with facts.
I assume you mean "against facts".
What I can do is dismiss a claim of "facts" that are unsupported by evidence.
You have defined "God" as a "who", absent evidence. You have claimed this "who" is the "first cause" due to the unproven "fact" that an infinite chain of causes is impossible, and that everything requires a cause. Why is your "who" exempt from this rule? Where is your supporting evidence?
What you have is a weak hypothesis, not a "fact".
AspieOtaku wrote:
Lintar wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
Lintar wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
Lintar wrote:
AspieOtaku wrote:
There is no Easter Bunny there is no Santa Clause, there is no Tooth Fairy or Boogie Man, or Sand Man, Jack Frost is not real either and neither is God it is all mythology.
Otaku, this response of yours is truly idiotic. To equate God with Father Christmas just goes to show that you accept the inane ramblings of the current saints of 'New Atheism' (i.e. Harris, Dawkins, Dennett and their ilk), and haven't even made the effort to truly understand what it is you think you are rejecting.
Is this the sad, low level that disbelief has sunk to?
Putting away childish things. Isn't that what Jesus says in the Bible? Yes, I do believe he does!
So people who don't believe in the reality of God are 'more evolved', are they?
You wish!
Most religious people DON'T reject evolution, they accept it.
Don't take this personally, but you would have to be the most misinformed person I have ever come across here at Wrong Planet. You just do not have a clue.
adifferentname wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
sophisticated wrote:
I have proven the existence of God right here on this thread.
Nope. You've proven that you believe in uncausable causes.
You cannot argue with facts.
the unproven "fact" that an infinite chain of causes is impossible
I've proven it. If you didn't see the proof then that is your problem not mine.
MannyBoo wrote:
There is no absolutely no empirical evidence that a god exists. Therefore there must be no god.
.
.
There's absolutely no empirical proof that your great great great great great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great greatgreat great great grand father existed ... therefore he never existed.

