Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

You know you're a sniveling liberal when...

Page 10 of 15 [ 229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Sep 2011, 10:32 pm

AceOfSpades wrote:
Telefunkenfan wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
pandabear wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
You're all for minorities and women yet you're rabidly in favour of banning Saturday night specials which are small enough for women and affordable enough for minorities.


Huh? not many restaurants run specials on Saturday, when more people are already eating out.

Where you are, do some restaurants offer smaller portions (for women) at a reduced price (for minorities) on Saturdays?

Few sniveling Liberals would really want to ban this.
Nah the type of Saturday night specials I'm referring to are served on a much colder dish :P

Image

Saturday night specials where banned due to profound manufacturing defects and gross negligence. a gun that blows up in the shooters hand is not only unfit for ANY user but does indeed need to be banned.The "link" to the weapons and any racial matter is nothing more than liberal rhetoric and blatant stupidity.
Well all the controversy about Saturday night specials aren't mainly about them blowing up in your hands but about them being used in crimes.


“Saturday Night Special” is a BS ambiguous term for a cheap pistol or whatever other small handguns that bother the weak minded.
There have been laws passed (the Gun Control Act of 1968 as an example) banning the import of small handguns that didn’t meet “sporting purposes” criteria. The workaround for that was to make them in the US.
It’s not that they blow up but that they aren’t of lasting quality and usually not very reliable or accurate. They typically come in the smallest calibers (.25 ACP, .32 ACP .22 LR.).
An attempt to ban them in hopes of keeping them out of criminal hands more often keeps them out of the law abiding low income individuals that need something for protection and even one of those el cleapo pistols is better than none.
Criminal hands tend to steal what they want including guns or buy them illegally.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

05 Sep 2011, 10:41 pm

Raptor wrote:
“Saturday Night Special” is a BS ambiguous term for a cheap pistol or whatever other small handguns that bother the weak minded.
There have been laws passed (the Gun Control Act of 1968 as an example) banning the import of small handguns that didn’t meet “sporting purposes” criteria. The workaround for that was to make them in the US.
It’s not that they blow up but that they aren’t of lasting quality and usually not very reliable or accurate. They typically come in the smallest calibers (.25 ACP, .32 ACP .22 LR.).
An attempt to ban them in hopes of keeping them out of criminal hands more often keeps them out of the law abiding low income individuals that need something for protection and even one of those el cleapo pistols is better than none.
Criminal hands tend to steal what they want including guns or buy them illegally.
Yep pretty much. Ambiguous terms are the backbone of the whole anti-gun agenda since they can lump as much crap under inclusive terms as possible to skew statistics and shift goal posts with. ZOMG tons of people suffer "Gun deaths" from "Assault weapons", they don't have any "Sporting purposes"!



Obres
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423
Location: NYC

05 Sep 2011, 10:44 pm

AceOfSpades wrote:
marshall wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
pandabear wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
You're all for minorities and women yet you're rabidly in favour of banning Saturday night specials which are small enough for women and affordable enough for minorities.


Huh? not many restaurants run specials on Saturday, when more people are already eating out.

Where you are, do some restaurants offer smaller portions (for women) at a reduced price (for minorities) on Saturdays?

Few sniveling Liberals would really want to ban this.
Nah the type of Saturday night specials I'm referring to are served on a much colder dish :P

Image


Get a REAL gun....

This better?
Image
You're getting there...

Image
Now THAT does my dick justice. I'm not a big Colt fan though, I'd go for a Beretta PX4 or a Smith and Wesson M&P 45.


Uhh.... wtf!? Hey, you know what does my dick justice? My dick.



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

05 Sep 2011, 10:44 pm

...And? :?



phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

05 Sep 2011, 11:03 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
When you believe a black man can be president.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


In the States, it's somewhat of a recent breakthrough... But I'm pretty sure it has occurred previously in African countries. :p



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

05 Sep 2011, 11:11 pm

Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Telefunkenfan wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
pandabear wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
You're all for minorities and women yet you're rabidly in favour of banning Saturday night specials which are small enough for women and affordable enough for minorities.


Huh? not many restaurants run specials on Saturday, when more people are already eating out.

Where you are, do some restaurants offer smaller portions (for women) at a reduced price (for minorities) on Saturdays?

Few sniveling Liberals would really want to ban this.
Nah the type of Saturday night specials I'm referring to are served on a much colder dish :P

Image

Saturday night specials where banned due to profound manufacturing defects and gross negligence. a gun that blows up in the shooters hand is not only unfit for ANY user but does indeed need to be banned.The "link" to the weapons and any racial matter is nothing more than liberal rhetoric and blatant stupidity.
Well all the controversy about Saturday night specials aren't mainly about them blowing up in your hands but about them being used in crimes.


“Saturday Night Special” is a BS ambiguous term for a cheap pistol or whatever other small handguns that bother the weak minded.
There have been laws passed (the Gun Control Act of 1968 as an example) banning the import of small handguns that didn’t meet “sporting purposes” criteria. The workaround for that was to make them in the US.
It’s not that they blow up but that they aren’t of lasting quality and usually not very reliable or accurate. They typically come in the smallest calibers (.25 ACP, .32 ACP .22 LR.).
An attempt to ban them in hopes of keeping them out of criminal hands more often keeps them out of the law abiding low income individuals that need something for protection and even one of those el cleapo pistols is better than none.
Criminal hands tend to steal what they want including guns or buy them illegally.


The purpose of the second amendment (as you know) has nothing to do sporting or protecting your home from "criminals"
It is the right to have parity of arms with the Cops, Soldiers and other enemies of freedom.
The second amendment is the right to plug a Cop when he invades your home.
It is the right to snipe a military thug when he is enforcing "martial law".
The horse has long since left the barn on this.
The NRA and other Jackboot licking pansies have turned it into a "sporting" and "crime" stopping issue.
It is a right we lost a long time ago.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,151
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Sep 2011, 11:25 pm

phil777 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
When you believe a black man can be president.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


In the States, it's somewhat of a recent breakthrough... But I'm pretty sure it has occurred previously in African countries. :p


I was in fact referring to the USA.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

05 Sep 2011, 11:38 pm

Obres wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
marshall wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
pandabear wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
You're all for minorities and women yet you're rabidly in favour of banning Saturday night specials which are small enough for women and affordable enough for minorities.


Huh? not many restaurants run specials on Saturday, when more people are already eating out.

Where you are, do some restaurants offer smaller portions (for women) at a reduced price (for minorities) on Saturdays?

Few sniveling Liberals would really want to ban this.
Nah the type of Saturday night specials I'm referring to are served on a much colder dish :P

Image


Get a REAL gun....

This better?
Image
You're getting there...

Image
Now THAT does my dick justice. I'm not a big Colt fan though, I'd go for a Beretta PX4 or a Smith and Wesson M&P 45.


Uhh.... wtf!? Hey, you know what does my dick justice? My dick.

No way!



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

05 Sep 2011, 11:52 pm

Obres wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
marshall wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
pandabear wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
You're all for minorities and women yet you're rabidly in favour of banning Saturday night specials which are small enough for women and affordable enough for minorities.


Huh? not many restaurants run specials on Saturday, when more people are already eating out.

Where you are, do some restaurants offer smaller portions (for women) at a reduced price (for minorities) on Saturdays?

Few sniveling Liberals would really want to ban this.
Nah the type of Saturday night specials I'm referring to are served on a much colder dish :P

Image


Get a REAL gun....

This better?
Image
You're getting there...

Image
Now THAT does my dick justice. I'm not a big Colt fan though, I'd go for a Beretta PX4 or a Smith and Wesson M&P 45.


Uhh.... wtf!? Hey, you know what does my dick justice? My dick.


Its like a second dick dude! Slightly more lethal

Image

Now that's a gun


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

06 Sep 2011, 12:39 am

AceOfSpades wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Here is another example of you know you're a liberal when you blame all the world's faults on Conservatives and never take responsibility for your own actions.
Perfect timing, this is right after you said you can't equate dictators with the right. Isn't personal responsibility something you stand for? Why project everything onto the left and blame them for everything rather than holding those on the right personally accountable?


Referring to the American style of right wing, which supports limited Government that generally stays the hell out of people's lives. That is kinda the opposite of the government trying to control every aspect of people's lives.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

06 Sep 2011, 12:44 am

Inuyasha wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Here is another example of you know you're a liberal when you blame all the world's faults on Conservatives and never take responsibility for your own actions.
Perfect timing, this is right after you said you can't equate dictators with the right. Isn't personal responsibility something you stand for? Why project everything onto the left and blame them for everything rather than holding those on the right personally accountable?


Referring to the American style of right wing, which supports limited Government that generally stays the hell out of people's lives. That is kinda the opposite of the government trying to control every aspect of people's lives.

... unless those "people" happen to be muslim, gay, or pregnant.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

06 Sep 2011, 12:53 am

LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Here is another example of you know you're a liberal when you blame all the world's faults on Conservatives and never take responsibility for your own actions.
Perfect timing, this is right after you said you can't equate dictators with the right. Isn't personal responsibility something you stand for? Why project everything onto the left and blame them for everything rather than holding those on the right personally accountable?


Referring to the American style of right wing, which supports limited Government that generally stays the hell out of people's lives. That is kinda the opposite of the government trying to control every aspect of people's lives.

... unless those "people" happen to be muslim, gay, or pregnant.


????

I have no problems with Muslims as long as they aren't trying to force Sharia Law on us, agree to obey the Laws of the United States of America (and actually tell the truth about swearing that), while they are inside the US, etc.

I may have a problem with homosexuals flaunting their sexuality in public, and I have a problem with gay marriage. I have no problem with what they do in the privacy of their own home, and do not think they should be rounded up or anything of that nature.

As far as pregnancy, my view is that pro-abortion people are the ones not protecting people's rights.

The woman has rights, both sides agree on that fact. However, pro-lifers believe the child also has rights while pro-abortion people view the child to be nothing more than a parasite and refuse to acknowledge the child's humanity. Conducting an abortion is essentially violating the child's basic human rights.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,151
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

06 Sep 2011, 1:41 am

Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Here is another example of you know you're a liberal when you blame all the world's faults on Conservatives and never take responsibility for your own actions.
Perfect timing, this is right after you said you can't equate dictators with the right. Isn't personal responsibility something you stand for? Why project everything onto the left and blame them for everything rather than holding those on the right personally accountable?


Referring to the American style of right wing, which supports limited Government that generally stays the hell out of people's lives. That is kinda the opposite of the government trying to control every aspect of people's lives.

... unless those "people" happen to be muslim, gay, or pregnant.


????

I have no problems with Muslims as long as they aren't trying to force Sharia Law on us, agree to obey the Laws of the United States of America (and actually tell the truth about swearing that), while they are inside the US, etc.

I may have a problem with homosexuals flaunting their sexuality in public, and I have a problem with gay marriage. I have no problem with what they do in the privacy of their own home, and do not think they should be rounded up or anything of that nature.

As far as pregnancy, my view is that pro-abortion people are the ones not protecting people's rights.

The woman has rights, both sides agree on that fact. However, pro-lifers believe the child also has rights while pro-abortion people view the child to be nothing more than a parasite and refuse to acknowledge the child's humanity. Conducting an abortion is essentially violating the child's basic human rights.


Very few American Muslims agree with the enforcement of Shariah law, and yet the right keeps painting them all with that paranoid brush. Proof of that is how Sharon Angle and others made it a campaign plank to accuse Deerborn Michigan of being placed under Shariah law by the Muslim populace. In fact, no such thing ever occurred. In fact, most of that city's Arab American residents are Christians.
As for gays not flaunting their sexuality in public - how is that any different than a straight couple holding hands or kissing in a public place? As a married person, I can tell you, it's married people who are the least demonstrative in public (at least after the newly wed phase). And so, in order not to be offended by gay public displays of affection, I'd think you'd be a supporter of gay marriage. :lol:

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland

06 Sep 2011, 3:58 am

Portlandia is hillarious and unfortunately true... you'll run into the type everywhere around here


_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

06 Sep 2011, 8:17 am

Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Here is another example of you know you're a liberal when you blame all the world's faults on Conservatives and never take responsibility for your own actions.
Perfect timing, this is right after you said you can't equate dictators with the right. Isn't personal responsibility something you stand for? Why project everything onto the left and blame them for everything rather than holding those on the right personally accountable?


Referring to the American style of right wing, which supports limited Government that generally stays the hell out of people's lives. That is kinda the opposite of the government trying to control every aspect of people's lives.

... unless those "people" happen to be muslim, gay, or pregnant.


????

I have no problems with Muslims as long as they aren't trying to force Sharia Law on us, agree to obey the Laws of the United States of America (and actually tell the truth about swearing that), while they are inside the US, etc.

I may have a problem with homosexuals flaunting their sexuality in public, and I have a problem with gay marriage. I have no problem with what they do in the privacy of their own home, and do not think they should be rounded up or anything of that nature.

As far as pregnancy, my view is that pro-abortion people are the ones not protecting people's rights.

The woman has rights, both sides agree on that fact. However, pro-lifers believe the child also has rights while pro-abortion people view the child to be nothing more than a parasite and refuse to acknowledge the child's humanity. Conducting an abortion is essentially violating the child's basic human rights.


Are you now identifying as a "Sniveling Liberal?"



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Sep 2011, 10:18 am

Inuyasha wrote:

I may have a problem with homosexuals flaunting their sexuality in public, and I have a problem with gay marriage. I have no problem with what they do in the privacy of their own home, and do not think they should be rounded up or anything of that nature.



What about heterosexuals flaunting there sexuality in public. If two het lovebirds want to get it on, why don't they go home or get a room and slither in each other's pubes privately?

ruveyn