Why haven't extraterrestrials made their presence known?

Page 10 of 14 [ 210 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next


Why haven't aliens made themselves known to us en masse?
They actually have but most people refuse to accept it 25%  25%  [ 20 ]
They think we are not ready for it 5%  5%  [ 4 ]
They think we are cruel/violent and don't deserve to know 9%  9%  [ 7 ]
They have a reason not to disclose that is unclear 6%  6%  [ 5 ]
Aliens have never visited Earth silly 56%  56%  [ 45 ]
Total votes : 81

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Oct 2012, 7:20 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
I am reluctant to believe anyone can move a massive body at or beyond light speed. I will believe it when I see it. In the mean time what you said was rank speculation and has no evidence whatever to support it.

ruveyn


'faster than light' isnt the only hypothesised way of moving from one part of the universe to another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


Scientists have put Warp Drive back on the table as scientificly plausible also.



The energy requirement for Alcubre's gravity warp wave exceed any energy source we can muster by at least ten orders of magnitude. Mathematically possible but practically infeasible.

There is not enough energy in the local cluster to make the thing work. And forget wormholes. They are unstable.

ruveyn


Actually the estimated energy cost for warp drive has gone down substancially also, so it is theoretically feasible.


The temperature inside one of Alcubres gravity waves exceeds the temperature of the sun's corona. What shall we make our star ships out of. Do you know any construction material that can withstand 2 million degrees Kelvin? I don't.

So even if the Alcubre warp effect could be produced (how?) there is nothing that can make any use of it.

ruveyn



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

06 Oct 2012, 7:40 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
I am reluctant to believe anyone can move a massive body at or beyond light speed. I will believe it when I see it. In the mean time what you said was rank speculation and has no evidence whatever to support it.

ruveyn


'faster than light' isnt the only hypothesised way of moving from one part of the universe to another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


Scientists have put Warp Drive back on the table as scientificly plausible also.



The energy requirement for Alcubre's gravity warp wave exceed any energy source we can muster by at least ten orders of magnitude. Mathematically possible but practically infeasible.

There is not enough energy in the local cluster to make the thing work. And forget wormholes. They are unstable.

ruveyn


Actually the estimated energy cost for warp drive has gone down substancially also, so it is theoretically feasible.


The temperature inside one of Alcubres gravity waves exceeds the temperature of the sun's corona. What shall we make our star ships out of. Do you know any construction material that can withstand 2 million degrees Kelvin? I don't.

So even if the Alcubre warp effect could be produced (how?) there is nothing that can make any use of it.

ruveyn

Adventus wrote:
Warp Drive Plausible and Possible 8O

If this is true we might see a true interstellar drive starship go out. AWESOME!

http://www.wrongplanet.net/forums-posti ... 21982.html

Considering NASA thinks it's capable of working, I think you are overestimating the requirements somewhat.



Raymond_Fawkes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,209

06 Oct 2012, 7:46 pm

I'm just jumping in here and giving my take, since I think about these things alot. I do understand and believe in panspermia, technically some forms of bacteria can infact exist and stay alive in space. At one point or another, bacteria from our planet must have been blown to the moon, and Mars, perhaps further outward. One thing I know, everything is connected. I see the entire Universe is alive, just not sentient but ever-changing and evolving. Continually creating, and destroying. I feel that, we are comprised of some form of alien bacteria/non Earth, but perhaps emerged someplace else in our solar system or galaxy, and made home on Earth. I don't feel space ships visit Earth, or anything like that. Perhaps centuries ago, although it's unlikely without proof. Also I feel that the Universe is like a computer with our consciousness substantiated into it. Our brains are at best - used for information processing. Everything is frequencies that we decode into photons, constructing into solid matter but nothing truly is solid but merely vibrational atoms.

Image



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

06 Oct 2012, 8:38 pm

If the technology could get them here,then it would be able to conceal them also.They would just examine us as we examine life forms that we think are more primitive than us.Some where in the galaxy little aliens are watching their version of National Geographic only it's called National Galactic and they really enjoy the primitive antics of the primate species on planet 4892322.



06 Oct 2012, 11:08 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
I think it is plausible that Aliens have visited this planet in the past...




There is not an iota of objective physical evidence to support that assertion.

ruveyn



In that case, what the hell was this thing and where did it come from?

If it is a terrestrial craft, please cite your sources as to who built it.



06 Oct 2012, 11:11 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
I am reluctant to believe anyone can move a massive body at or beyond light speed. I will believe it when I see it. In the mean time what you said was rank speculation and has no evidence whatever to support it.

ruveyn


'faster than light' isnt the only hypothesised way of moving from one part of the universe to another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


Scientists have put Warp Drive back on the table as scientificly plausible also.



The energy requirement for Alcubre's gravity warp wave exceed any energy source we can muster by at least ten orders of magnitude. Mathematically possible but practically infeasible.

There is not enough energy in the local cluster to make the thing work. And forget wormholes. They are unstable.

ruveyn





First of all, the Alcubierre drive requires the use of negative energy to which there is no evidence for.


The only way a warp drive can work is a VERY high powered gravitational amplifier. But in order for the spaceship to prevent being crushed into oblivion and then evaporating in a burst of gamma rays, it would need to rotate extremely rapidly and build up enough angular momentum to protect itself from the immense gravitational forces being generated. THAT is how you would create a stable wormhole.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

07 Oct 2012, 12:20 am

AspieRogue wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
I am reluctant to believe anyone can move a massive body at or beyond light speed. I will believe it when I see it. In the mean time what you said was rank speculation and has no evidence whatever to support it.

ruveyn


'faster than light' isnt the only hypothesised way of moving from one part of the universe to another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


Scientists have put Warp Drive back on the table as scientificly plausible also.



The energy requirement for Alcubre's gravity warp wave exceed any energy source we can muster by at least ten orders of magnitude. Mathematically possible but practically infeasible.

There is not enough energy in the local cluster to make the thing work. And forget wormholes. They are unstable.

ruveyn





First of all, the Alcubierre drive requires the use of negative energy to which there is no evidence for.


The only way a warp drive can work is a VERY high powered gravitational amplifier. But in order for the spaceship to prevent being crushed into oblivion and then evaporating in a burst of gamma rays, it would need to rotate extremely rapidly and build up enough angular momentum to protect itself from the immense gravitational forces being generated. THAT is how you would create a stable wormhole.


the alcubierre drive isnt a wormhole,

but actually the wholer idea of the new improvement is to rotate the field to create something akin to a the looking glass of alice principle in black holes.
a donut shapen rotating energy field.
as far as i can see there would be no discernible phsyical pressure on the vessel when riding inside the bubble, there is a wake are both inside and outside where there would be immense pressures but ship geometry can account for most of it.

still requirtes a way to manipulate negative energy which we dont have


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


07 Oct 2012, 2:02 am

Oodain wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
thomas81 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
I am reluctant to believe anyone can move a massive body at or beyond light speed. I will believe it when I see it. In the mean time what you said was rank speculation and has no evidence whatever to support it.

ruveyn


'faster than light' isnt the only hypothesised way of moving from one part of the universe to another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


Scientists have put Warp Drive back on the table as scientificly plausible also.



The energy requirement for Alcubre's gravity warp wave exceed any energy source we can muster by at least ten orders of magnitude. Mathematically possible but practically infeasible.

There is not enough energy in the local cluster to make the thing work. And forget wormholes. They are unstable.

ruveyn





First of all, the Alcubierre drive requires the use of negative energy to which there is no evidence for.


The only way a warp drive can work is a VERY high powered gravitational amplifier. But in order for the spaceship to prevent being crushed into oblivion and then evaporating in a burst of gamma rays, it would need to rotate extremely rapidly and build up enough angular momentum to protect itself from the immense gravitational forces being generated. THAT is how you would create a stable wormhole.


the alcubierre drive isnt a wormhole,

but actually the wholer idea of the new improvement is to rotate the field to create something akin to a the looking glass of alice principle in black holes.
a donut shapen rotating energy field.
as far as i can see there would be no discernible phsyical pressure on the vessel when riding inside the bubble, there is a wake are both inside and outside where there would be immense pressures but ship geometry can account for most of it.

still requirtes a way to manipulate negative energy which we dont have



It has been shown that when the Alcubierre space-time bubble exceeds the speed of light, the resulting hawking radiation would produce such extreme temperatures that the the spaceship would be large enough to disintegrate the spaceship into a plasma of elementary particles as well as causing instability in the bubble itself. It is highly unlikely that negative energy exists whatsoever.

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.



Lord_Gareth
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 440

07 Oct 2012, 10:07 am

One thing people are forgetting - light speed still takes FOREVER to get anywhere. Going double or even triple the speed of light would still be too goddamn slow to go anywhere of astronomical significance.


_________________
Et in Arcadia ego. - "Even in Arcadia, there am I."


b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

07 Oct 2012, 10:46 am

Lord_Gareth wrote:
One thing people are forgetting - light speed still takes FOREVER to get anywhere. Going double or even triple the speed of light would still be too goddamn slow to go anywhere of astronomical significance.

i do not think anyone is "forgetting" that. the notion of traveling with a linear velocity to a distant destination has long been ruled out by most people who are considering the matter of interstellar travel.

the current ideology (as far as i know (which is not very far)) is to warp the space plane we are on to reduce the distance that needs to be traveled.
if one had a ticker tape a quintillion miles long, then the idea is to warp the tape by bending it over so that the end is just inches away from the beginning, rather than hurtling at impossible speeds in a linear fashion to take trillions of years to get to the end.

in order to bring the destination close by, one would have to create a gravitational force that compresses all that spacial distance into a manageable short hop, and the energy required to do so is not found anywhere in the universe, let alone able to be harnessed.

even super massive black holes have not the influence required to compress an incomprehensible inter galactic distance into a distance that is able to be traversed by ordinary means. there is no energy source in the universe that can cramp the distances in question into the same location that one is already in.

worm holes are impossible. quantum relocation may be the best idea, but whoever is a test
subject to volunteer to take the "journey" would not be able to report whether it was successful unless they "came back" (they are millions of light years away), and that would not be possible because there is no apparatus to enable that return trip available at the destination.

who knows? (i am sure all of you do), but i believe that quantum entanglements of fundamental "pairs" of energy is the only way that one can travel outside time to impossible distances within time.
i have my helmet on.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Oct 2012, 11:10 am

AspieRogue wrote:

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.


With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium?

ruveyn



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,951
Location:      

07 Oct 2012, 11:17 am

ruveyn wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.
With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium? ruveyn

Handwavium. It will do anything you want it to, as long as you don't try to explain how it works.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

07 Oct 2012, 11:26 am

ruveyn wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.


With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium?

ruveyn

you have a sprightly and humerus mind for a 76 year old.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Oct 2012, 11:27 am

b9 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.


With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium?

ruveyn

you have a sprightly and humerus mind for a 76 year old.


My body only appears to be 76. Inside I am still the same 19 year old mad-man I was 57 years ago. To the mirror I say: "You lie, damn you!"

ruveyn



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

07 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm

ruveyn wrote:
b9 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.


With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium?

ruveyn

you have a sprightly and humerus mind for a 76 year old.


My body only appears to be 76. Inside I am still the same 19 year old mad-man I was 57 years ago. To the mirror I say: "You lie, damn you!"

ruveyn

i have trouble believing you are 76, but i do not consider you to be dishonest. i have never seen a 76 year old person who can out think young people in immediate circumstances.

that is all i have to say and your ego should not prompt you to extend this conversation.



07 Oct 2012, 12:08 pm

ruveyn wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:

Very neat idea, but it will never work. The wormhole is really the only option and the way to stabilize them is using angular momentum.


With what? An angular momentum stabilizer that runs on unobtanium or nosuchthingium?

ruveyn


A Kerr black hole is a essentially a space-time tube whose boundary is maintained by a ring shaped singularity. And FYI such an object has been found: Sagittarius A*. I actually saw an article in the last year that astronomers have finally succeeded in imaging its event horizon, confirming that this object is indeed a black hole and the heart of it is a massive hole in space-time 11 million miles wide. 8) What prevents Sagittarius A* from collapsing to a true singularity is its angular momentum. I have mentioned this in more than one thread you posted in. Despite theoretical predictions that Kerr black holes are too unstable to exist, the observational evidence suggests that objects with such properties really do exist. Schwarzschild black holes however, are theorized to exist and there are several objects believed to be Schwarzschild black holes, but the problem is that this has not yet been confirmed since astronomers have yet to observe an event horizon on such an object(which means that such objects may be compact neutron stars).