Why do rednecks side with the Republican Party?

Page 10 of 10 [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

02 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm

StinkyDog wrote:
Wait a tick. You speak Russian, and you don't deviate from the Kremlin-approved script. But,

Jacoby wrote:
...maybe he would of had a chance...


Now I'm confused. In English, the compound past tense is formed with the verb "to have" as the auxiliary, followed by a past participle. NEVER with the preposition "of", except among Americans of VERY low educational attainment. "Maybe he would HAVE had a chance", not "maybe he would OF had a chance."

Are you American? Or, are you now being taught to deploy poor English grammatical constructions, the better to mask your identity? :?

My grammar is atrocious. :twisted:


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

02 Jun 2017, 12:23 pm

I think I am pretty clear about the who and why behind the sabotage, the deep state and MIC obviously do not want for there to real progress in our War on Terror as they want perpetual war. It is America that bears more responsibility than anyone for the rise of radical Islam which previous administrations have cynically used as proxies against our supposed enemies. I think Trump most definitely had the intention using to diplomacy with Russia to solve the issues in not just Syria but also Ukraine, this partisan witch hunt regarding Russian collusion based only on innuendo and vague insinuations of meddling has effectively put the prospects of a grand bargain like this on hold. Democrats cry crocodile tears for these Syrians but they do not want any real workable solution to end the war, like it or not whatever end to this conflict in Syria will have to include Russia and the Syrian government. Assad's government is a secondary issue to ending the broader conflict and eliminating ISIS/other jihadist militants,

What has Trump done that is a violation to constitution? I'd like to hear that, these judges mostly out of the activist 9th Circuit are trying to read intent on this travel ban rather that what the executive orders actually says and does which is totally within the power of the presidency. The Supreme Court will rule against these judges, it's kind of stupid since the temporary ban would of been over by now anyways.

Our political system is what it is, the point I was making is that Trump is simply one man instead of the leader of a political party or organized movement so his powers are limited in what he can really do even if it is within the authority of the president to do so. Foreign policy is something that is totally in the responsibility of the president but we've had a lot of illegal meddling from certain elected officials like John McCain and unelected/former Obama bureaucrats, do you trust the Obama/Bush foreign policy? I don't and I think they're having a hard time relinquishing power. I simply want Trump to be able to exercise his powers as president as any other president has, now the US presidency has evolved into a very powerful unilateral position that can make things happen by decree on certain things but that obviously did not start with Trump. You can blame Bush and Obama for much of the expansion of presidential power, the cat is out the bag on this one. Gridlock and extralegal obstruction is not what this country wants or needs. Democrats should be trying to find ways to work with Trump and take advantage of his non traditional Republican ideas, there is no reason for them to oppose infrastructure.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

02 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm

StinkyDog wrote:
Wait a tick. You speak Russian, and you don't deviate from the Kremlin-approved script. But,

Jacoby wrote:
...maybe he would of had a chance...


Now I'm confused. In English, the compound past tense is formed with the verb "to have" as the auxiliary, followed by a past participle. NEVER with the preposition "of", except among Americans of VERY low educational attainment. "Maybe he would HAVE had a chance", not "maybe he would OF had a chance."

Are you American? Or, are you now being taught to deploy poor English grammatical constructions, the better to mask your identity? :?


I speak google translate, same as you. :lol:

I find the idea that you think I am some secret Russian KGB agent to be highly amusing but if you seriously believe that then you've truly gone off the deep end with paranoia. All this Russia bashing and baseless accusations is straight up McCarthyism and it's all for nothing too, because some people cannot accept responsibility for losing an election(and costing some powerful people billions of dollars for sure) and because of crimes they do not want uncovered/investigated. You are being used and I don't think it's something that is going to work out in the end for Democrats, the American people do not buy this false narrative about Russian collusion. The saboteurs will be found and dealt with accordingly, I am hopeful that Trump will be able to proceed as he was originally planning once this is all put behind him.

If you want to have a discussion with me then try to be a little less trollish, I don't think anybody in history has been impressed with the grammar Nazi.



Last edited by Jacoby on 02 Jun 2017, 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

StinkyDog
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2017
Age: 76
Gender: Female
Posts: 475
Location: In Your Mind

02 Jun 2017, 1:45 pm

Misslizard wrote:
My grammar is atrocious. :twisted:


Your grammar is quite good. As are your spelling and diction. :D



DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

02 Jun 2017, 2:27 pm

StinkyDog wrote:
Wait a tick. You speak Russian, and you don't deviate from the Kremlin-approved script. But,

Jacoby wrote:
...maybe he would of had a chance...


Now I'm confused. In English, the compound past tense is formed with the verb "to have" as the auxiliary, followed by a past participle. NEVER with the preposition "of", except among Americans of VERY low educational attainment. "Maybe he would HAVE had a chance", not "maybe he would OF had a chance."

Are you American? Or, are you now being taught to deploy poor English grammatical constructions, the better to mask your identity? :?

Could you please stop that?

I've known Jacoby for years. He and I go way back to ... like ... 2011. He's not a Russian agent. He just trusts the Trumpster a bit too much.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


StinkyDog
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2017
Age: 76
Gender: Female
Posts: 475
Location: In Your Mind

02 Jun 2017, 7:15 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Could you please stop that?

I've known Jacoby for years. He and I go way back to ... like ... 2011. He's not a Russian agent. He just trusts the Trumpster a bit too much.


Do you know Jacoby personally? Or just through the internet? If just through the internet, then, well, you might not really know Jacoby.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OauLuWXD_RI

Also, Russian disinformation campaigns go way back to the early 20th century.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wor ... c59020e65e

Now, the Russians have deployed thousands of people to troll the internet, to defend the takeover of Crimea, and to spread misinformation in the West. It is possible that their operations began before 2011--I don't know. When they were the USSR, they were supporting Gus Hall and the American Communist Party. Times have changed, but goals are similar. Except that the Russians have been vastly more successful with Trump than they ever were with old Gus Hall.



sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

02 Jun 2017, 10:45 pm

Your probably the Russian spy trying to throw people off by making them think it's someone else.

Or maybe a paid account by one of many left groups.

Really quite more suspicious of a new account who's sole goal and actions is to slander a long standing account. Quite fits the definition of a troll.



StinkyDog
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2017
Age: 76
Gender: Female
Posts: 475
Location: In Your Mind

03 Jun 2017, 8:46 am

sly279 wrote:
Your probably the Russian spy


No. You must work with Jacoby in the same office. Using "Your" instead of "You're." Very clever. :wink:

sly279 wrote:
Really quite more suspicious of a new account who's sole goal and actions is to slander a long standing account. Quite fits the definition of a troll.


You're (not "your") the one committing slander here.

Definition of a troll wrote:
a mythical, cave-dwelling being depicted in folklore as either a giant or a dwarf, typically having a very ugly appearance.



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

05 Jun 2017, 2:24 am

Personal attacks have continued despite a warning. Thread locked.