Page 10 of 16 [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 16  Next

Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

23 Jul 2018, 7:58 pm

The robbed ones may disagree—perhaps forcefully.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

23 Jul 2018, 8:02 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
The robbed ones may disagree—perhaps forcefully.


Of course they will.

Of course, the supporters of universal healthcare will fight harder. When your life is on the line, that's generally a good motivator.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jul 2018, 10:16 pm

Robbed? Whatever happened to the right's pro life position? Or does that get nullified when money is involved?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

23 Jul 2018, 10:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Robbed? Whatever happened to the right's pro life position? Or does that get nullified when money is involved?


The right doesn't really want to protect the unborn. They want to deny women a choice.

I will admit that some anti-abortion people are morally consistent, but most are not. Some people in the hardline movement are anti-abortion, pacifist and vegan … though most "pro-lifers" refuse to explore the implications of the anti-abortion position.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardline_(subculture)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_life_ethic


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jul 2018, 11:00 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Robbed? Whatever happened to the right's pro life position? Or does that get nullified when money is involved?


The right doesn't really want to protect the unborn. They want to deny women a choice.

I will admit that some anti-abortion people are morally consistent, but most are not. Some people in the hardline movement are anti-abortion, pacifist and vegan … though most "pro-lifers" refuse to explore the implications of the anti-abortion position.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardline_(subculture)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_life_ethic

I absolutely agree, 100%.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

24 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
The robbed ones may disagree—perhaps forcefully.


Of course they will.

Of course, the supporters of universal healthcare will fight harder. When your life is on the line, that's generally a good motivator.


Yeah, the only reason my mom has healthcare is because of Obamacare.

I don't give a fig about the wailing of tax-whiners.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Jul 2018, 4:18 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
The robbed ones may disagree—perhaps forcefully.


Of course they will.

Of course, the supporters of universal healthcare will fight harder. When your life is on the line, that's generally a good motivator.


Yeah, the only reason my mom has healthcare is because of Obamacare.

I don't give a fig about the wailing of tax-whiners.


I give that an AMEN!! !


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

24 Jul 2018, 4:47 pm

Now you both are talking like playground bullies, which is probably a way to discourage further debate, but, of course, being autistic and all that, I can't ever be sure.

Just because you don't give a fig about the wailing of those robbed to benefit you doesn't make it any less robbery. And they won't give a fig about your wailing when they defend themselves and cut it off.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Jul 2018, 6:41 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Now you both are talking like playground bullies, which is probably a way to discourage further debate, but, of course, being autistic and all that, I can't ever be sure.

Just because you don't give a fig about the wailing of those robbed to benefit you doesn't make it any less robbery. And they won't give a fig about your wailing when they defend themselves and cut it off.


The only difference is, cutting off someone's health coverage is fatal. No amount of money has more worth than a human life.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


ltcvnzl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,311
Location: brazil

24 Jul 2018, 6:56 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Now you both are talking like playground bullies, which is probably a way to discourage further debate, but, of course, being autistic and all that, I can't ever be sure.

Just because you don't give a fig about the wailing of those robbed to benefit you doesn't make it any less robbery. And they won't give a fig about your wailing when they defend themselves and cut it off.


i don't agree with your analogy of tax being robbery. it's not this simple, as it also benefit the person who is supposedly being robbed, even if she isn't directly using a public health system (or any welfare program) it does contribute to a better society, where they can prosper better, as people will have less reasons to revolt or commit crimes if they have basic needs covered, also healthier population are better workers, and a good universal healthcare can deal with spreadable diseases.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,691
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

24 Jul 2018, 10:01 pm

This looks a lot like a thread I've answered to before, and I don't see my post but if I say something now nearly identical to something a few pages ago please forgive me.

The bigger question to me isn't whether it should be a right but whether it 'can' be a right.

Even in the US, as we're considered to have a bit of a plutocratic system, technically if you have no money and need to be taken to the ER the Hippocratic oath is in effect and the system takes care of you. The trouble comes in for those who aren't dealing with punctuated incidents and have very expensive and challenging long-term health concerns to deal with such as diabetes and cancer for example or many kinds of crippling neurological and mental health conditions.

Part of our problem I think is technological and way may very well see it changing rapidly. The most important advances I think toward having healthcare as a right is preventative care. For example I've read at least an article or two about Japanese toilets designed to analyze your urine for early precursors of cancer and other health problems that can show up in your urine. We may very well find ways to make blood tests that cheap. Eventually, even within our lifetimes, it could be that we'll find plenty of household products for less than $100 which monitor our health almost as well as a full-time team of doctors. Some people have also said that 5G will be a great catalyst for medical information and assistance.

I think we're on our way to making this a moot point relatively soon. May not be much comfort for those who are struggling today and will be for the next few decades or passing. If anything though, if we really want to help the people who are physically and financially suffering over health, probably the best way we can help them is put our R&D toward their specific problems and finding way as soon as possible to stop their long-term conditions from being tantamount to life-long crippling debt.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

25 Jul 2018, 3:28 am

ltcvnzl wrote:
i don't agree with your analogy of tax being robbery.


It's not even an analogy. The only reason we don't call it robbery is that the ones committing it don't. That's hardly a sound reason.

ltcvnzl wrote:
it's not this simple, as it also benefit the person who is supposedly being robbed, even if she isn't directly using a public health system (or any welfare program)


Whatever the robber does with the stolen goods doesn't change the fact that it's robbery. Only voluntary donations are not robbery. If those alleged benefits were convincing enough to the people paying for them, they wouldn't need to be robbed.

Noöne has any business telling you what you should or should not be interested in or what your own money should be spent on. That's what robbers, bullies and tyrants do.

ltcvnzl wrote:
it does contribute to a better society,


Better as judged by whom? Certainly not those you have to take money from by force to maintain it. If they deemed it a better society, they wouldn't have to be forced to pay for it; they'd do it of their own free will.

ltcvnzl wrote:
where they can prosper better, as people will have less reasons to revolt or commit crimes if they have basic needs covered,


You can't fight crime with crime. You're essentially saying people should put up with the big robber (government) in case other criminals show up in its absence. Well, let people decide how to deal with the criminals as they come, shall we? For starters, investing on weapons, ammo and training is probably a much more effective strategy than feeding the enemy.

ltcvnzl wrote:
also healthier population are better workers, and a good universal healthcare can deal with spreadable diseases.


So does letting diseased criminals die either naturally or in self-defense when they trespass on your property or try to steal anything from you.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

25 Jul 2018, 3:38 am

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
I think we're on our way to making this a moot point relatively soon. May not be much comfort for those who are struggling today and will be for the next few decades or passing. If anything though, if we really want to help the people who are physically and financially suffering over health, probably the best way we can help them is put our R&D toward their specific problems and finding way as soon as possible to stop their long-term conditions from being tantamount to life-long crippling debt.


And, you know, the best way to help those able and willing to pay for the R&D is to focus on their particular needs and stop spending resources helping the rest.

As technology makes more and more people redundant, the global human population will be reduced one way or other. It's not a matter of whether, but when and how, and, as always, it's not about who is right, but who is left.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am

People in need are not diseased criminals.
Stocking up on guns and ammo isn't going to solve criminality. If anything, that sort of vigilantism will only cause more.
Every life has worth, not just those of taxpayers.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,333

25 Jul 2018, 12:06 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
The robbed ones may disagree—perhaps forcefully.


Of course they will.

Of course, the supporters of universal healthcare will fight harder. When your life is on the line, that's generally a good motivator.


Yeah, the only reason my mom has healthcare is because of Obamacare.

I don't give a fig about the wailing of tax-whiners.


I give that an AMEN!! !


I'm gonna Triple up on the Tag Team of Love Versus those who basically don't give a Crap now about anyone
else but those in their tight circles of life that may go as low as one too as that will be Group and Single think too
that yeah, I Thank God for Obama; Nah, he didn't do anything for me personally for increasing the size of my current
Big Fat Wallet in the Bank the way that Bush with all his Free Social Welfare Tax Give aways to those who are more
Affluent and the Current Trump/Ryan Social Welfare Give away to top Dog Folks in the Money Pool now but what
was and still is and will be for a very long time the Altruistic Benefit of the Obama Heritage is yes, the Fact that
some folks who couldn't possibly attain enough Health Insurance for at least a Safety Net where they wouldn't
go broke, or at worse die now from a Chronic Disease is yes, My Sister was able to Retire from close to a
6 Figure Well Padded Government Contractor Job at age 55 instead of age 65 after working 30 Years
at that Job. And yes, if you are also diagnosed on an Autism Spectrum you better think twice and
three times more if you don't think you are ever gonna need some kind of Government Provided
Social Net to make it all the way through life. You might be on the easy end of stuff now but yes
Sh88 happens all the time now and your number may be up yet with a Hand out and begging for some help
as many folks do just to survive now at a most basic bottom of Maslow's Pyramid of Existence up to the top
of Human Thrive with Love to give and share with all others and the rest of existence now. Yes, more specifically
My Sister is Diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome too and she was staying with the Extreme Stress of Her Job just
for an issue of gaining affordable Health Care then. With continued Stress more than likely it would have not only
made it impossible for her to have any Happiness in life; but also lead to a much shorter full span of life too in just
more misery and suffering of all the disease stress will make real now. She got out 10 Years early from Medicare and
pays a measly 25 Dollars a Month for a Bronze Obama Plan now. That's enough to make sure she doesn't go broke
with a Catastrophic Chronic Health Condition as those can and will come at any age as sure you could get in a Car
Accident tomorrow and all the Modern Research and Development for Preventative Medicine won't do a thing for
you with Catastrophic Injury from any Accident in life. An other Safer option might be stick inside your home
but what the Hell is Life Worth without any Liberty now. Love is the way to Liberty; Love Freely shared and
given by all. If You don't have that according to Science, at least, you are just about as sick as sick comes sadly
now with or without Insurance as the fact of the matter is too that is an incurable disease for some it still seems now.

When a Cure comes for 'that' so many more folks will Truly Win at Life (Happiness that's real at core too {Love})


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

25 Jul 2018, 12:40 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Now you both are talking like playground bullies, which is probably a way to discourage further debate, but, of course, being autistic and all that, I can't ever be sure.

Just because you don't give a fig about the wailing of those robbed to benefit you doesn't make it any less robbery. And they won't give a fig about your wailing when they defend themselves and cut it off.


Don't want to pay taxes?

Go live in the woods and eat berries and bugs. Society isn't obligated to allow you to benefit from its infrastructure scot-free.

You're perfectly content to be obese and drive-up health insurance premiums for those of us who choose to live healthy lifestyles. Don't wag a finger at me until you clean your own back porch.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)