Why not machines

Post Reply New Topic

No. Your sentence doesn't even make sense. You throw in a lot of misapplied words everywhere.



On the whole, who is using more AI research than they are?

Well, I'll be sure to let Cornell University know that you're a raging nutjob, including transcriptions from this thread and a link to the thread. I'll also inform my good friend who is currently studying for his second year of a PHD in artificial intelligence and machine learning at Edinburgh University (one of the UK's leading institutions in such a subject), and who was contacted several years ago by the US military with a request to help them develop the AI system that now drives the prototypes for their autonomous rescue robots (i.e. he knows his s**t), and get him to get word out in the AI community at large that you are f*****g dangerous.

Thanks for the heads up. I changed my avatar so all you know now is my last name. And if I can't get into Cornell, I can just go somewhere else of equal or indeed greater elitery. Especially if I do a bang-up job on my undergraduate work, which seems increasingly likely considering that my courses are finally getting interesting.

Last edited by chever on 03 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Your last name is all I should need. Good luck.

How many Chevers are there?

And do you really believe the admissions office 'blacklists' people?

You bunghole

Your behavior is pathetic and futile.

Hmmm...I think I like it.

Give me a list of words you have a problem with...and I will tell you how I was applying EACH of my words(lets not forget english words tend to have MANY MANY definitions for each word). After reading through all these threads, it has come clear to me, you PICK AND CHOOSE your interpretations of peoples definitions and do not consider them all at first.

Either you are indeed a nutjob like everyone else is saying...or you misunderstand everyone, by misinterpreting damn near everything, and cause what has occured in this thread...where you have been arbitrarily labeled "psychopath" by a fair number of people, because you focused in one direction and did not seek to elaborate or clarify your own points or anyone elses.

While I certainly will not consistently defend all of my GRAMMAR(words are another story), since I am not going to reproof it all for an online forum...I do use additional paragraphs and intentionally break certain grammatical rules for effect.

If those breaches of grammar and occasional misproofs confuse you, than ask before you reply, rather than interpreting them all one way. I am not going to even attempt using something like college thesis grammar to get my point across. Half of those rules are ret*d anyway. I read through s**t, and think to myself that there are about 100,000 better ways to explain what they could've using different possible methods of citation, presentation, and grammar.

I write my messages more like a SPEECH...not a thesis. If you have a problem with that too damn bad for you.

So either answer in the context of several possible interpretations...or ask for clarification(several times if needed), so that you don't confuse yourself and everyone else when you make them think you are debating one point, when in fact you attack something else entirely(at least thats the way it seems to me).




I say again...such an answer would be based purely on speculative studies or opinion. No one in the world has the accurate information to provide an answer to what you are asking.

I could even ask someone or some organization with magnificent credentials to get me the answer to that question, and they still would not have the ability. If they provided me with anything, it would be speculation at best, taken by the minimal sources of cost(s), persons/organizations involved when/where, results, and patent logs.

Last edited by Hero on 03 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

See..... You ARE defending genocide, because your defending (AGAIN) an argument for genocide. And did you not try to cut and run saying something to the effect that you were at least considering the well being of people? But here you are defending a guy who openly talks about wanting to use machines to kill people. I caught you in a lie.

@ Hero, Yes, I am probably a nutjob. But I don't BS around points or try to obfuscate. I am a firm believer in the principle "less is more", especially when it comes to writing. Say what you need to say, then stop.

@ snake321, the term 'genocide' applies to ethnic or religious groups. 'Extinction' or better yet 'garbage collection' would be more appropriate here.

Last edited by chever on 03 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Wait, when was the first time?



No...



No, I don't think you did. I'm actually a very honest a**hole.

All of your nonsense aside, someone is trying to blacklist Chever from college admissions departments based on information gained on an internet forum. Do you know how laughable that sounds? Gimme a friggin' break.

Last edited by Phagocyte on 03 Oct 2008, 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I never said I would attempt to blacklist him - merely point-out to people that he's properly batshit insane.

I don't think I'm the only one who thinks someone who has fetishes about extinguishing humanity having the potential to be in a position of power is a bad thing.

Last edited by RogueProcess on 03 Oct 2008, 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Yeah, yeah, and they said Erdos was uncouth.

You know, I really don't know whether I'm blowing off huge billows of steam or whether I am actually serious about my beliefs.

It all depends on how things go in the next few years.

Either way, I am getting into a top engineering university one way or the other. If Cornell doesn't except me because some bunghole convinces them I'm a nutjob, then there are quite a few others in this wide land I can surely get into.

I scheduled a visitation for this month anyway.

Good luck. Have you looked into Drexel? It's no Cornell, but it's regional and has a good reputation for engineering programs.