Quote:
Of course two men (or two women) can't produce children together (biologically). But that's not what I was saying.
No, but you seemed to be implying that because something is natural it is right. I believe there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexual partnerships, i believe they should be allowed to marry and adopt, but using nature as a justification doesn't work. People should decide using their own minds, not listening to some guy who wears a funny hat, or some quack scientist talking about animals that are slightly related to us.
Quote:
And it's not natural for some women to be infertile, and it's not natural that some hetero couples don't want kids, and it's not natural that some couples adopt....
The structure and rhythmn of your statement leads me to believe it's a counter-arguement. Although it only seems to be agreeing and highlighting my original point.
Quote:
I also wanna add that I really dn't get why people keep repeating that the behaviour is a choice (ie you don't choose to be attracted to someone, but you choose the "gay lifestyle"). Isn't that obvious? No one is denying that. iBeing gay isn't an action or behaviour though.
The original question was ambiguous and did not state exactly what it was asking for.
Quote:
And those "anti-gay" treatments (nearly all run by conservative Christians) are bull.
If someone was diagnostically shown to have low testosterone at birth, would you support giving them testosterone supplements? At which point would it become a disease?
Quote:
no, its showing his true colors. because in case you haven't noticed, acting effimante for guys is knocked for being gay and the effimante gays are the most harrased and abused bunch. Do you have any idea how hard it is to watch what you say or do so you don't get outted?!
Hmmm, you mean how i have to prevent myself from hand-flapping in public? yeah i think i know what it's like...