Do you consider Islam a threat?
Not at all. Praise to Allah ( ) that all this crap about a clash of civilisations will come to an end in the next year or two. There has never been any possibility that it could even hope to threaten the west, it has neither the political nor economic strength. The resorting to terrorism was the final acceptance of the coming defeat. Islamic fundamentalism is a response to and rejection of Western modernisation. The methods used to express this by Al-Qaeda (airplanes, satellite phones, global media as well as extreme violence, our favourite mode of communication for many a year) is to subsume the message they convey to the means of its conveyance.
Islamic Fundamentalism (not a psychiatric disorder Ruyven, though I've seen at least one other post of yours which seemsd to justfiy the killing of muslims with 9/11, this sort of thing shouldn't surprise me from your good self) rose to prominence as a reaction to the advance of western liberal democracy and modernisation into the middle east, which compressed the process the west underwent over 100-150 years or so into a decade. The destabilising effect was immense, and violent, hence the turn among some to an ideology which purported itself to be a viable defence against 'western imperialism' and so forth. Dialectically speaking Islamic Fundamentalism is the antithesis of (in particular) Anglo-American neo-liberalism, both of which are ideological dead-ends. In the space of the next two years there will be an uprising in Iran to remove the Ayatollah and will destroy Islamic Fundamentalism as an ideological force, taking its dialectical opposite with it into the abyss of history.
It's interesting to see your reactions, they differ much from reactions to such polls in the Netherlands. Whilst you think there isn't a real problem, many people in Holland disagree and think we are in danger.
@ Keith
Indeed you could vote for other parties, but you cannot ignore or stop an increased influence of Muslims in politics.
_________________
Christians believe in The Holy Bible, Muslims believe in The Qur'aan and I believe in Mother Goose's Tale.
I GRADUATED WITH THE HIGHEST GRADES OF MY YEAR!! !! !
To me, one must evaluate a religion by what it actually teaches in its doctrine.
Islam teaches conversion via violence...global jihad. NOT ALL MUSLIMS PRACTICE THIS, and that's a good thing for everyone in the world, but in religion, a person who practices only the parts of their faith they agree with is considered a heretic.
So, as a religion, the threat will always be there, and from what I hear is going on in Europe, they are becoming increasingly militant every year in what they demand from others outside their faith.
Sooner or later, this will result in violence when the non-Muslims refuse to concede anything further.
Islamization? That sounds really suspicious and borderline prejudice. Accusatory in tone, even.
_________________
"If Evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve" - Jello Biafra
Check out my blog at:
http://thelatte.posterous.com/
Yeah, well they have been misinterpreting the book of Revelations for a century, and no one should take them seriously (but their wacko followers do). Lucky for them that this is not a biblical nation - the Bible says that the penalty for false prophets is death!!

...
I think most of them want to get along. We both think the other is going to hell, but we can at least live with each other.
Yes, most do just want to get along - and not all members of one group think all members of the other group are going to hell. Many Christians think that Jews who faithfully follow their religion are in good standing with God, and many Muslims think that Christians and Jews who faithfully follow their religion are in good standing with God.
There are many models for muslims to live in a non-muslim country. It took me 2 minutes to find a speech given in the US by a Muslim scholar visiting from the Middle East - in the speech, he explores one such model in depth. Most noticeably, he states that the fact that Muslims are able to proselytize and teach their faith makes the US a just society - in his interpretation, Muhammed resorted to force to conquer only because he was oppressed, harassed, and driven out of Mecca - such physical/political struggle was a last-resort response to intolerance, not a general strategy to follow in the absence of oppression.
...
However, in this country, the ruling people are allowing you to call people to Islam, and this is exactly what the Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, was asking that they allow him to do in Makkah. These people here are allowing you to call people to Islam. They are not prohibiting you. If you go out and proselytize, they don't come and arrest you; they don't punish you; they don't torture you. This idea here should be understood, and the verse from the Quran that we should take as the overriding verse in our relationship with this people is where Allah subhaana wa ta'aala says concerning those who neither fight you because of your religion nor remove you from your homes that He does not prohibit you from showing them birr: righteousness.
....
Also, it is necessary for us to show respect to these people. Islam prohibits us from showing aggression towards people who do not show aggression towards us. The Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said, "Do not enter the houses of the Christians nor eat anything of their fruits except with their permission." Islam prohibits theft; it prohibits fraud; it prohibits cheating; and it prohibits these things in relation to the Muslims and in relation to the non-Muslims. The things that you cannot do to a Muslim, you also cannot do to a non-Muslim. The Messenger of Allah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, also said, "None of you truly believes until he wants for his brother what he wants for himself." Imam Shabrakhiti ibn Rajul al-Hambali and others mentioned that "brother" here not only means your brother Muslim because this is a close brotherhood of Islam that others are not in, but it refers to the greater and broader brotherhood of our Adamic nature.
Allah, subhaana wa ta'aala, for that reason says, "Call to your Lord with wisdom and with a beautiful admonition, and dispute them in the most excellent of ways." In other words, debate with them and dialogue with them in the most beautiful of ways. Don't be argumentative; don't be cruel; don't be mean; don't humiliate them. Do it ways in which they can listen to the truth, respect the truth, and come to the truth. For this reason, we have to be du'ahtis salaam: people who are callers to peace.
We also have to be good citizens because an excellent Muslim is also an excellent citizen in the society that he lives in. This does not mean that we lose our distinction, that we become completely immersed in the dominant society to where we no longer have our own identity-that is not what I'm calling to. We have to maintain those things that are particular to us as a community, but we also have to recognize that there are other things that are not particular to us but rather general to the human condition that we can partake in; and these things are not things that we should be ignorant and neglectful of but things that we should be engaged in.
http://www.themodernreligion.com/world/ ... iving.html
Of course, this is only one model - others do see themselves as subversives fighting an un-Godly regime. But the same is true of Christianity - there is a 'Jesus Camp' group that wants to take over government and impose their religious interpretations, and a mainstream that is not interested in that. But there are models of being Muslim in societies where other religions are dominant.
Any ideology that expects women to cover up their sexy bits in public and stands up against the free market gets my vote.
I think a lot of the aggression that comes from certain "Islamic" extremists is the fault of the West, who should have left the Arab world alone.
Islam is no more dangerous than any other religion. There will always be bastards who use religion as an excuse for atrocities and for judging "unbelievers" as somehow inferior to themselves. I have no religion, and see no reason for it, as I don't think there are any deities or miracles. But as long as the perpertrators do no harm, I'm happy to live and let live. Violence will always find some excuse or other, and if they didn't use religion then they'd just be a cult or a political group instead.
I accept that it's a pain in the butt that a lot of religious people hold onto harmful practices in the genuine belief that their gods want it that way, and it's a shame that they're so badly brainwashed that it would be very hard to talk them out of their beliefs without them feeling extremely guilty........in that sense I'd love to remove religion from the world completely, but I suspect they'd just replace it with something just as bad, and the more you oppress an ideology, the more it digs its heels in and fights back.
I think Titus kinda said it best <.< the fast forward shift to modern technology was initiated by the Shah when he once was in power. Ofc he had his own private police to silence opponents of said modernization... So yeah <.<
And just as a side comment, notice there's an increasing amount of muslim matrimonal ads popping up on WP? :p
Well, that's how context-sensitive advertising works. If the thread has lots of references to anxiety, expect to see ads for various anti-anxiety products. If the thread is heavy on a particular religion, expect ads for Bibles or Kosher foods or Muslim match-makers.
Its not really all about religion......... Its about race and culture. People don't want to see these differently colored people coming in from strange places and taking out their sisters and daughters for dating; having mixed-race babies with them. People like having people who look like them, act like them, dress like them, and speak their same language living on their block. People don't want to live in multi-racial neighborhoods and see their children brought in by minority culture. Dads don't want to see their sons acting like Eminem or some rap idol.
Even if the Muslims do become a majority.... They will never be true Englishmen or Americans or whatever. They will just be Muslims living in Europe or America.
But the fact is that Sunni Islam is a politicalized religion, and this negates their right to 1st Amendment protection. Being a Muslim is a lifestyle, being part of a greater worldwide allegiance and trumphing loyalty to any nation. If they don't separate church and state in their community and want to impose that paradigm on us, than they have no right to expect any better in return. The radical Muslims cry and whine all day that we don't respect their rights or religion and we mock Allah or whatever, but then they turn around and impose their barbaric cultural standards on their own community and make elaborate plans to make their way of life the law for everyone in due time. The fact is that the Muslims want it both ways......... They expect every benefit of the welfare state and all of the freedoms we offer, but then they turn around and impose their regimentation in their own communities.
Islam and 3rd-world immigration is the greatest threat facing us today. We have to send them all back at once. We can't let their cancer keep growing and spreading. Their goal is to force us all to worship Allah at the point of a sword. They will bring a new Dark Ages upon is if we don't act now.
Fortuantely people are starting to wake up to the threat.
@Brusilov
nice to see the pointy-white-hat-guys are still about. I'm pretty sure Muslims aren't entirely fond of people like yourelf either. Strange that you would proselytise on the intolerance of Muslims in the west then.....well, I don't need to spoon feed you all the rest, do I?
That said I think multiculturalism is the most virulently racist ideology yet to raise it's ugly head. I say this because multiculturalism exists only as the white liberal obverse of a global capitalist economy which annihilates or assimilates every society and culture in it's path. The very reason human beings (I deliberately use this term, for they are) from Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East migrate to the first world is because of the sheer devestation sociologically, economically, ecologically which the global economy wreaks upon the thrid world. The only way to maintain both this economy and political stability in the west is through multiculturalism. Maybe there is a point where we just have to say on the level of identification there is an irreducible alien-ness to each other, our hatred and violence should be directed not at each other but at the thing which throws us together....
You want Arabs to stay in Arabia? Stop arming Saudi kings so you can have cheap oil.
You want Africans to stay in Africa? Stop poisoning their continent. Stop dumping your federally subsidised and substandard crops on their market.
You want Latin Americans to stay in Latin America? Stop destabilising every government that doesn't squeal "Uncle Sam!" every time you walk into the room. Stop your absolutely ineffective, wasteful and bloody handed policies on drugs and do something that works rather than what's good as a quick soundbite.
And Asia. Well Asia is a mess. Course they kicked you out of there many a moon ago.