Master_Pedant wrote:
Get close to affecting insitutional reform and such impulses will surely change.
I am not going to get close to affecting institutional reform though. In fact, most of us aren't close to affecting institutional reform.
I mean, here's the different versions I can see you attempting to promote:
1) If you got into power, you would put people into power such that they can enact your vision.
2) If you got into power, you couldn't resist the urge to use that power.
3) If you got into power, you would have to corrupt your message such that the power would be used.
I think most people would grant 1. The issue is 2 and/or 3. I don't think anyone can argue that 2 must be universally true though, why? Because that requires having a uniform "human" to base one's ideas off of, and such a creature doesn't exist. 3 is more of an institutional argument though, and I am not sure you really are making an argument like that.