leejosepho wrote:
TonyTheTiger wrote:
The evidence of 9/11 as an inside job seems very circumstantial to me, and just plain violates common sense.
We might want "common sense" to suggest 9-11 could not have been any kind of "inside job", but the "circumstantial evidence" is far too great to be sanely ignored. As with Kennedy's assasination, most of us will likely never know what actually happened.
Yes - any rudimentary understanding of the dynamics of political institutions refutes the conspiracy theories.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoDqDvbgeXM&NR=1[/youtube]
NOTE: What Chomsky refers to as "the left" (as in "a large portion of
the left") is what mainstream pundits would call the "ultra-left".
In terms of physics, chemistry, and engineering - the conspiracy theorists are way out of their depth.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... page=1&c=y
In terms of the unknowable nature of the 9/11 attacks - while microscopic details shall evade us we
know the big picture. That is to say, terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the towers.
20 Dec 2009, 12:49 am
