Could Autism Speaks be part of the New World Order???

Post Reply New Topic

i honestly dont see this, at least in the sense i think you mean; aspies=unconventional?

theres a lot of 'aspies' that have the stereotype robotic, authority worshipping, rule obedient characters. perhaps not so much noticeable on this website, but elsewhere. you could say theyve built a new box inside the box & their doing their thinking inside the new, smaller box.

aside from that, 'aspies' for all their quirks seem to share (with the general population) pretty much all the faults that make people easy to manipulate. perhaps more in some aspects, slightly less in others.

All in all, i just notice that people are very easily controlled, we just get an impression of being 'outsiders' and less prone to manipulation because were part of the same set, talking about common ground and shareed experiences. With practice its easy to see other people being controlled, harder to identify it in yourself.

Even the 'aspie' label - its just an arbitrary construct, (i dont buy it scientifically - ive said a lot about this elsewhere) It is useful in bringing us together but at the same time destructive & divisive when looked at society as a whole. The 'us & them' mentality outgrows any use it may have had and becomes a toxic, self-fulfilling prophecy.

So, whilst we may like to think of ourselves as 'outside the box' thinkers, in reality were probably just another side to that proverbial box.

Well, you ask a simple and yet complex question.

For the sake of debate, let us agree that there is an elite group of people (politicians, uber-wealthy plutocrats, captains of industry, etc.) who feel they should rule the world and have worked for decades to consolidate global power into structures they either control directly or heavily influence that benefits their ideals and personal prosperity. We shall call this the New World Order (NWO).

The next question is if an organization is part of the NWO directly. That would make it fairly obvious. Any organization that is part of the NWO will mirror the agenda of the parent organization and largely follow the directives issued from the parent organization.

Now, if that is not the case here, the next issue is if the organization chooses to associate with the NWO via the parent organization or one of its daughter entities.

It is easy for many independent organizations to be "pawns" of the NWO because the leadership of that organization decides to either associate with a NWO organization or to take the directives of a NWO entity as a model for its own. When this is the case, I would never trust that organization any more than I would trust the NWO itself.

So, YES, Autism Speaks COULD be a part of the New World Order. If it is truly an independent organization, a change in philosophy or leadership could end any such association.

If you were asking if Autism Speaks WAS/IS a part of the New World Order, a closer examination of the facts would be called for.

Yeah. I was going to reply, but it's probably better not to argue with insane people. It never works.

It seems this organization is getting more and more mighty, but I doubt they will kill me, because I have very few, if no traits left, I could pass as a schizoid person, or maybe I will get rid of my traits once and for all soon, many aspies has done it before us.

"Could Autism Speaks be part of the New World order?"

Autism Speaks is not fit for that. Any leader of such an order should have a strong willed heal to stomp with, that likely can't be persuaded much, if that. What I mean is "You have a goal, you better get it right, hold your ground and make it!" Not change slightly because the trend helps get money to waist.

My thoughts.

Apparently you didn't notice the one in this thread who possesses actual paranoid traits.
<-

Last edited by LiendaBalla on 30 Dec 2009, 7:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Please keep your damnable judgments of me to yourself, Orwell!

Why ??? All Orwell is doing is asking you to explain in rational and objective terms your statement. Does this make you uncomfortable? Why so? could it be that you believe in fantastical notions and conjure up the evidence to support them, therefore the slightest external enquiry leaves you clutching at straws and finding none?

If you had said that the financial elite wish to increase profits by slashing the living conditions of the poorer sections of society I would be in total agreement with you, there is plenty of evidence for this. These policies will undoubtedly lead to a reduction in life expectancy. But to state ''the global elitists' desire to reduce the population of this world is no secret'' is a fairly undefendable position.

Of course. It is completely obvious. There should no longer be any question.

I wander if that design is owned by wanta-bees.

Sorry, img stretched screen.

Instead I will say:

WHAT IS THIS I DONT EVEN

^
a meme.

When he does that completely free of any judgment or innuendo related to me, I might again get involved. But until then, such bullies will have to find some other way to entertain themselves and/or each other.

He really didn't say anything wrong, you said something is not a secret and he asked why you think that.

And then you asked for evidence that it is a secret . The evidence for which would be that he doesn't know about it + any proof you have that it is real.

Catch 22? In order to prove its a secret hewould have to know enough about it for it to not be a secret to him anymore...

Again...

WHAT IS THIS I DONT EVEN

Whenever I try to do such, you get offended anyways. I certainly gave no insult in my earlier reply to you in this thread (what insult can you possibly take from "Evidence please?" It is a simple request to back up your claims). You consistently act as though I have insulted you whether I have or not. At a certain point, I feel I may as well do the things for which you are going to get angry at me anyways.

And I can give stupid ultimatums too: until such time as you are able to actually present your claims coherently, outside of vague and baseless accusations, I will continue to assume that you are simply another raving conspiracy loon.

Re our original exchange: The statement "X is not a secret" or "It is no secret that X" is a common idiom for "it is well-known/well-established that X" or, more simply, "it is true that X." When I asked for evidence behind this claim, it should have been obvious to anyone fluent in English that I was asking for evidence for the claim X, ie that the "global elite" desires a dramatic reduction in world population. I was not asking for evidence that the alleged fact X is kept a secret—that would be absurd. That you chose to respond as though that is what I meant can only indicate a deliberate misinterpretation to avoid answering the question and instead dismissively reject any further queries from me (or anyone else who dares to question the nonsense you spout).

Ok, I dunno who opened up this can of worms, but it would appear that it's mega-sized.

Apparently there's been a drastic increase in the demand for tinfoil here. However, being of rational mind, I seriously doubt that Autism Speaks is part of... wait what was is again... New... World... Order? what the hell... ok, you know what, I'm not even gonna try and get into this. It's more fun just to sit back and watch the sparks fly. *grabs a box of popcorn and leans back in chair*

Defiantly a rush on for tinfoil