Deconversion
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
greenblue wrote:
To deny that a deconverted wasn't really a Christian or a devoted Christian seems nonsense, I understand that inside a christian doctrine, ANYONE can fall for WHATEVER reason, therefore no one can guarantee your salvation, I, at least, learned as a Christian, that salvation wasn't never a guarantee. I was a conservative christian, and probably that has a lot to do with my apparent "deconversion".
It has much to do with other things, such as a personality and psychology and given that, their own faith weakens due to some circumstances, may have to do in few cases with weak personality, I admit I am insecure and do have a weak personality and that probably was easy for me to wonder about my beliefs, I can't say wether I am that deconverted though but I started with a faith crisis.
I believe I used to be a devoted Christian, I wondered why my fellow christian mates didn't behave christ-like, as I supposed then that as a Christian either you honestly would try to imitate Christ or get the hell out of church.
But heck! given that all religious dogmas seem to be very questionable, that concept wouldn't matter much, would it?
It has much to do with other things, such as a personality and psychology and given that, their own faith weakens due to some circumstances, may have to do in few cases with weak personality, I admit I am insecure and do have a weak personality and that probably was easy for me to wonder about my beliefs, I can't say wether I am that deconverted though but I started with a faith crisis.
I believe I used to be a devoted Christian, I wondered why my fellow christian mates didn't behave christ-like, as I supposed then that as a Christian either you honestly would try to imitate Christ or get the hell out of church.
But heck! given that all religious dogmas seem to be very questionable, that concept wouldn't matter much, would it?
Excuses, excuses...
greenblue wrote:
To deny that a deconverted wasn't really a Christian or a devoted Christian seems nonsense, I understand that inside a christian doctrine, ANYONE can fall for WHATEVER reason, therefore no one can guarantee your salvation, I, at least, learned as a Christian, that salvation wasn't never a guarantee. I was a conservative christian, and probably that has a lot to do with my apparent "deconversion".
Well, one of the five points of Calvinism is "Perseverance of the Saints," or "once saved, always saved."
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Orwell wrote:
greenblue wrote:
To deny that a deconverted wasn't really a Christian or a devoted Christian seems nonsense, I understand that inside a christian doctrine, ANYONE can fall for WHATEVER reason, therefore no one can guarantee your salvation, I, at least, learned as a Christian, that salvation wasn't never a guarantee. I was a conservative christian, and probably that has a lot to do with my apparent "deconversion".
Well, one of the five points of Calvinism is "Perseverance of the Saints," or "once saved, always saved."
Orwell, taken at face value this is what I believe. I didn't know it was Calvinism (I don't claim to adhere to one theologian or another, though I LOVE the STRIDENT approach of van Til--but somehow non-traditional approaches all seem to make better sense to me).
I'm sure it's been said before, but honestly I've come to this conclusion on my own. Someone who claims to be a Christian but does not act Christ-like has a strong likelihood of not actually believing ("faith without works is dead," James, I think). You CAN be saved and not have works (Paul, though most often in the context of "works of the law" in reference to legalism). Someone who feels he has "lost" his faith, because of the once-saved principle, probably never had a real faith in the first place.
I guess I can also see a situation in which an immature Christian could "lose faith" through various life circumstances, become embittered, go through a process of blaming God, and in the end find himself reconciled with God. In that case, a person never truly abandoned their faith. Many Christians I know are perfect pillars of society as long as things go their way. When times are tough, they fall apart and crumble under the weight of life. When my wife and I describe to other church members everything that happened to us over the last 3 years, they are absolutely stunned because they can't imagine losing EVERYTHING and still survive with their families and sanity still intact. The kind of situation we've found ourselves in is exactly the stuff divorces are made of because people too often just give up in the face of any kind of struggle, especially when life can be as cruel as it has with us. A lot of people, I think, actually envy us because of the kind of faith we've developed through the whole ordeal. If anyone asks how we've made it, we simply say we owe it to a faith in someone who is bigger than any bad situation and who remains in control. If God directs our path, there is no need to worry about what could happen.
I don't mean to imply that we're lazy and are merely aimlessly floating down the stream of life into the ocean of eternity. We're hard workers. But we've also learned that all the hard work in the world (you don't work, you don't eat) doesn't make a bit of difference in the bigger picture. Faith first. After that, we just do the best we can.
AngelRho wrote:
Orwell, taken at face value this is what I believe. I didn't know it was Calvinism (I don't claim to adhere to one theologian or another, though I LOVE the STRIDENT approach of van Til--but somehow non-traditional approaches all seem to make better sense to me).
The problem with Van Til is that his theology ends up being a bunch of silliness. It is difficult to conceive of an intellectually honest transcendental argument for God that is honest and still completely a knock down argument that people just have to surrender to. The issue is that he was clearly convinced he found a knock-down argument.
What really ends up is that presuppositionalists look like jerks.
Orwell wrote:
Well, one of the five points of Calvinism is "Perseverance of the Saints," or "once saved, always saved."
well, I don't know about Calvinism and what would be the requirements for salvation which I pressume it would differ from conservative Christianity.
I was a seventh day adventist, and I learned from there the idea of salvation being through our actions (obeying the law) along with having your mind off immoral thoughts as well as faith in Christ. I believe it can be said that to be related to the Seven deadly sins to illustrate, in that regard, that would prevent someone from being saved. (ie homosexuals, alcoholics, people who masturbate won't go to heaven if they don't repent ) Based on that, I was taught that people, even if they accepted Christ could fall again because they would still be imperfect beings and would still be able to exercise their free-will. Of course I am showing a particular view from one particular church, and probably not the entire denomination, so I don't exactly know what other conservative denominations see this, given that SDA gives great importance to the 10 commandments, but I pressume it could be similar, I mean conservative christians believe homosexuals won't be saved anyway.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
greenblue wrote:
well, I don't know about Calvinism and what would be the requirements for salvation which I pressume it would differ from conservative Christianity.
A lot of conservative Christianity is Calvinist, so it is likely not so different. I mean, basically, in conservative Christianity there are two groups: Calvinists and Arminians. The two groups don't differ so much on morality as they do on how God saves people.
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
well, I don't know about Calvinism and what would be the requirements for salvation which I pressume it would differ from conservative Christianity.
A lot of conservative Christianity is Calvinist, so it is likely not so different. I mean, basically, in conservative Christianity there are two groups: Calvinists and Arminians. The two groups don't differ so much on morality as they do on how God saves people.
A lot of the issues revolve around the definitions of words, such as sovereignty, predestination, will, choice, etc... on and on and on, ad infinitum. One camp is entrenched around defending God's sovereignty at all costs and the other is entrenched at defending humankind's responsibility for our sins (this is not formulated exactly, by the way.)
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
A lot of the issues revolve around the definitions of words, such as sovereignty, predestination, will, choice, etc... on and on and on, ad infinitum. One camp is entrenched around defending God's sovereignty at all costs and the other is entrenched at defending humankind's responsibility for our sins (this is not formulated exactly, by the way.)
Well, I tend to give humankind full responsability for their sins even if there is no free-will, unless the belief in beings wether supernatural or even aliens is necessary for the purpose of blaming them.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
