pandabear wrote:
I suppose that it might happen someday, if the USA eventually elects a president who likes the idea. Then, for example, when a new Bible comes out in the next thousand years, President Obama will get the same kudos that the present Bible directs at Cyrus. President Bush would never have countenanced it--he was far too buddy-buddy with King Faisal.
One problem is that a mosque sits atop part of the temple ruins.
If the Jews do rebuild the temple, will animal sacrifices come back?
And, if the Jews do rebuild the temple, does that mean that all of the scary things described in Revelations will start to unfold? Would we all be better off just not rebuilding the temple, so that we can stop those things from happening?
I think they can rebuild it whenever they feel like it!

Personally, I'd take it as a good sign if they did.
Someone mentioned scientifically putting the Bible to rest. There is a SLIGHT problem with that. The Bible does not specify WHEN the temple will be rebuilt, so there's no guarantee that the events of Revelation will begin to happen if the Temple were rebuilt, say, next year. For all we really know, prophecies regarding the Temple destruction and rebuilding point to an as-yet unbuilt temple that will, as its ancient predecessors, be destroyed and rebuilt at an even much later date. The fulfillment of prophecy includes the rebuilding of "a" temple, but also includes other related factors and events as well.
Ahhh the beauty of ambiguity in prophecy. How convenient. Well written prophecy is always either self-fulfilling or obscure enough that it can apply to anything, depending upon the time and place.