Page 2 of 4 [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 12:10 pm

I think its a too much too expect anyone from the "GLBT" community to feel good toward the "Abramic religions" although obviously they all do have gay members some being "cured" and others choosing an "interpretaton" that lets them be proud. I think the honest truth is that all those religions are really anti gay and it takes a lot of "interpretaton" and "seeing the historical context of the author" to get past that. And how can you anyway. Paul and Muhamed claimed to be directly inspired by God, so if you believe one of them you believe everything they say is perfect, bigoted parts and all.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 12:32 pm

Mutate wrote:
I think its a too much too expect anyone from the "GLBT" community to feel good toward the "Abramic religions" although obviously they all do have gay members some being "cured" and others choosing an "interpretaton" that lets them be proud. I think the honest truth is that all those religions are really anti gay and it takes a lot of "interpretaton" and "seeing the historical context of the author" to get past that. And how can you anyway. Paul and Muhamed claimed to be directly inspired by God, so if you believe one of them you believe everything they say is perfect, bigoted parts and all.


It's not a question of whether what they said is true or not. Not for the LGBT community that is religious. It's a question as to whether those that wrote their stories and opinions down got it right.

Either way, doesn't matter to me. I cannot accept an omnipotent and omnipresent god that throws the misguided to some mythical creature that's the embodiment of everything that is 'evil'.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm

As far as I know Paul wrote his own words down and Muhamed at least dicated it and then approved the result. Christ we only have second hand of, but the only groups he attacked were capitalists and fake religous money makers.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 12:50 pm

Mutate wrote:
As far as I know Paul wrote his own words down and Muhamed at least dicated it and then approved the result. Christ we only have second hand of, but the only groups he attacked were capitalists and fake religous money makers.


Both of which have been translated and retranslated.

Anyway, this fact is inconsequential. My membership in the LGBT community has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion of any religion.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 12:57 pm

OK Tea I apoligise if i was assuming you were more rejecting based on who you are. Its more whats in my own head really. I mean the whole thing about how intact the Koran or the words of Paul have stayed through history is something im not an expert on. I assume most literalist believers would say they have stayed intact. Thats why I think it's only a true Koran in the original Arabic and translations are just called "the meaning of" the Koran. Thus I would expect they have tried hard to keep it unchanged over the years. I know there was a noturious "satanic verse" part praising other gods that Muhamed changed himself claiming satan added it.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm

There's been many books taken out of the Bible, as well.

Honestly, I think basing an entire religion on one book is rather foolish. Why didn't Jesus write it all down himself? Because it was never meant to be the cornerstone of the religion and people's faith/beliefs.

The Bible is nothing more than a collection of writings that convey individual opinions and ideas. It's not, and never was, the 'inspired word of god'.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm

I am not some big defender of christianity but I will give my opinion on that. Jesus importance wasnt in what he said it was in what he did. so it only took people to report it. I'm not saying I believe it happened though, just that the writings are not the important thing there imo.



Celoneth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 526

16 Aug 2010, 1:08 pm

TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:
Mutate wrote:
I think its a too much too expect anyone from the "GLBT" community to feel good toward the "Abramic religions" although obviously they all do have gay members some being "cured" and others choosing an "interpretaton" that lets them be proud. I think the honest truth is that all those religions are really anti gay and it takes a lot of "interpretaton" and "seeing the historical context of the author" to get past that. And how can you anyway. Paul and Muhamed claimed to be directly inspired by God, so if you believe one of them you believe everything they say is perfect, bigoted parts and all.


It's not a question of whether what they said is true or not. Not for the LGBT community that is religious. It's a question as to whether those that wrote their stories and opinions down got it right.

Either way, doesn't matter to me. I cannot accept an omnipotent and omnipresent god that throws the misguided to some mythical creature that's the embodiment of everything that is 'evil'.

I agree - or that would send someone to eternal torture for some petty reason - or who creates living, thinking creatures to use as his playthings in some cosmic version of the Sims. The idea that this is someone you should not only worship but love and invite into your heart is off-putting.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 1:12 pm

Celoneth wrote:
TeaEarlGreyHot wrote:

Either way, doesn't matter to me. I cannot accept an omnipotent and omnipresent god that throws the misguided to some mythical creature that's the embodiment of everything that is 'evil'.

I agree - or that would send someone to eternal torture for some petty reason - or who creates living, thinking creatures to use as his playthings in some cosmic version of the Sims. The idea that this is someone you should not only worship but love and invite into your heart is off-putting.


Extremely off-putting. How egotistical and needy do you have to be to create sentient beings, put impossible standards on them, and then demand they worship you?

World's first egotistical a**hole, if you ask me.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 1:14 pm

Mutate wrote:
I am not some big defender of christianity but I will give my opinion on that. Jesus importance wasnt in what he said it was in what he did. so it only took people to report it. I'm not saying I believe it happened though, just that the writings are not the important thing there imo.


Yet you use the writings (the Bible) to back up your assertion that the religion is inherently anti-gay.

Interesting...


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 1:27 pm

Let me clarify. I believe there is a difference between Jesus himself, and the type Chrisitanity founded by Paul, which has been the dominant form of Christianity since Roman times. I believe Christianity is anti gay unless you discard the post gospels new testament and Paul or at least discard the belief that all he wrote was directly guided by God and see him as a flawed man who could be wrong. Which involves cutting out a lot of christianity. When i said "the writings" i meant the idea that Jesus should have written something down, i dont think writings he made would have been a important as what actions he is meant to have done.

I think people on this forum have an unrealistic idea of "interpreting" religions and think that everyone just "interprets" some vague book based on what they believe, a bigoted person will read it as bigoted and an accepting person will see it as accepting. I think it is more complicated than that and more dificult imo.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 1:32 pm

Mutate, have you seen the movie Stigmata?


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm

No but I will look it up.

I am currently going to a Quaker meeting which is of course left wing, anti war, pro gay form of christianity and like it there. I also used to go to another similar church which was left wing, political activist with a gay pastor. So the things I wrote are personal fights i am wrestling with inside myself. I prefer their path to the fundamentalists and think they have a more fair and informed way of studying scripture critically, but problems are still there and need to be faced.



Celoneth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 526

16 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm

Mutate wrote:
Let me clarify. I believe there is a difference between Jesus himself, and the type Chrisitanity founded by Paul, which has been the dominant form of Christianity since Roman times. I believe Christianity is anti gay unless you discard the post gospels new testament and Paul or at least discard the belief that all he wrote was directly guided by God and see him as a flawed man who could be wrong. Which involves cutting out a lot of christianity. When i said "the writings" i meant the idea that Jesus should have written something down, i dont think writings he made would have been a important as what actions he is meant to have done.

I think people on this forum have an unrealistic idea of "interpreting" religions and think that everyone just "interprets" some vague book based on what they believe, a bigoted person will read it as bigoted and an accepting person will see it as accepting. I think it is more complicated than that and more dificult imo.


The Bible and most religious texts are such large and inconsistent documents that it is possible to find any interpretation you want - and they claim to be divinely inspired - and people do use it to argue their case - because, after all, if the omnipotent creator of the universe says something, that's almost as good as having actual evidence to back up your case. Although I do think it is more complicated - does the interpretation that one is exposed to create the belief or is the interpretation chosen because of the underlying belief - and that I think depends on the person.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

16 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm

Mutate wrote:
No but I will look it up.

I am currently going to a Quaker meeting which is of course left wing, anti war, pro gay form of christianity and like it there. I also used to go to another similar church which was left wing, political activist with a gay pastor. So the things I wrote are personal fights i am wrestling with inside myself. I prefer their path to the fundamentalists and think they have a more fair and informed way of studying scripture critically, but problems are still there and need to be faced.


It's a good movie.

I have considered a Unitarian Church, but the truth is it's far too ritualistic and religious for me.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Mutate
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 497

16 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm

to be fair though, the Koran was written (dicated i should say) by one man. Though i havent read it or researched contradictions in it. I know it has parts which are spiritual and wise, and also some parts here and there which are offensive to modern western equal rights and thus are the "fly in the ointment".