Page 2 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

18 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm

Why fight with China at all? Worst comes to worst we trade them Canada and a cut of the Iraqi oil to write off the debt, problem solved. :lol:


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

18 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Why fight with China at all? Worst comes to worst we trade them Canada and a cut of the Iraqi oil to write off the debt, problem solved. :lol:


Well, wouldn't we first need to conquer Canada? Oh, wait... that wouldn't be so difficult, eh?



DenvrDave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 790
Location: Where seldom is heard a discouraging word

18 Sep 2010, 1:33 pm

Given that China currently has a comparatively cheap and plentiful labor force, an existing and innovative manufacturing base, a global market, and the ability to sell off US debt thereby raising US interest rates, I think China would have the upper hand early on in a trade war. Which is not to say that the US wouldn't or couldn't eventually overcome, but I think it would be a long drawn-out war extending over decades and possibly up to half a century or more, and it could get pretty darn bloody both metaphorically and (hopefully not) literally. Which makes me think, the US is vulnerable right now.

This makes sense to some extent...

ikorack wrote:
Wouldn't we simply switch over to becoming a manufacturing nation again? We have the resources for it.
...but it would take decades.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

18 Sep 2010, 2:54 pm

No it wouldn't, we have manufacturing buildings still we just need to update them and find workers.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

18 Sep 2010, 2:58 pm

ikorack wrote:
No it wouldn't, we have manufacturing buildings still we just need to update them and find workers.


I'd be willing to be a factory worker if there were anyone hiring. More generally, high amounts of unemployed citizens equals no shortage in potential labor.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

18 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm

So in other words now would be a good time to return manufacturing to America?



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

18 Sep 2010, 4:23 pm

We could buy cheap CNC machine tools from China and outsource the programming to India, put all our unemployed people to work feeding metal into the machines and assembling the parts; get back into manufacturing tomorrow. Hey, that started out as sarcasm but might actually work...


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Laz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,540
Location: Dave's Toilet

18 Sep 2010, 4:27 pm

Let china continue with its current actions it won't be able to sustain its strategy indefinatly. The big moan is all those stock brokers unable to make as much money as they would like on their forex trading.



Quartz11
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,237
Location: New England

21 Sep 2010, 7:30 pm

Laz wrote:
Let china continue with its current actions it won't be able to sustain its strategy indefinatly. The big moan is all those stock brokers unable to make as much money as they would like on their forex trading.


If not China, it will just start up in some other second world country with enough infrastructure and desperate people. The multinational corporations will just turn out of China and go to somewhere else cause its cheaper.

Vietnam could be the next China if cards fell right. It could be Pakistan or Indonesia, but security concerns there (esp. in Pakistan) crush their chances. Bangladesh certainly has the population, but lack of infrastructure and troubling neighbors don't help.

The only hope for American manufacturing is either (a) trade war or (b) sudden end of cheap oil supplies



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

21 Sep 2010, 8:21 pm

ikorack wrote:
So in other words now would be a good time to return manufacturing to America?


Manufacturing in the U.S. generates about $1.6 trillion, or 12 percent of our gross domestic product, accounting for nearly three quarters of the nation’s industrial research and development (R&D), two-thirds of our nation’s total exports of goods and services, and supports more than 20 million high-paying jobs. Manufacturing also ensures we have a strong industrial base to support our national security objectives.


ruveyn



RedHanrahan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,204
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand

23 Sep 2010, 2:59 am

The USA is already loosing a trade war with China and without some complete reversal of national ambition and culture this is an inevitability, this is China's century and we had all best get used to the idea, personally I don't think that it could be any worse than the last century which the USA claimed as it's own.


_________________
Just because we can does not mean we should.

What vision is left? And is anyone asking?

Have a great day!


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

23 Sep 2010, 3:17 am

RedHanrahan wrote:
The USA is already loosing a trade war with China and without some complete reversal of national ambition and culture this is an inevitability, this is China's century and we had all best get used to the idea, personally I don't think that it could be any worse than the last century which the USA claimed as it's own.


Or the 19th century which was Britain's Century.

ruveyn



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

30 Sep 2010, 10:16 am

Good freakin god. I kinda glanced at this thread before but didn't really put much into it because I figured it'd be beyond stupid to try and leverage against China at this point but sure enough, I'm seeing news now that the US is taking complaints about China's policies and essentially starting a trade war.

What kind of hubris does one have to possess to try and start a trade war with the country holding however many billions or trillions of our dollars as loan collateral. All China would need to do would be feel comfortable enough in its economic and production sitting to just dump all that and completely devalue the dollar. And this trade war talk during a period where every moron is pushing less and less taxes against everyone. Sadly, a fiat monetary system means that we cannot live tax free. Especially those who hold the majority of the wealth...but they have the most effective lobby to get the tax breaks and cuts that they want (despite it being an absolutely lossy move for the country at this point). You cannot have 10% of the country with 80% of the wealth in a fiat system and have it be sustainable.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

30 Sep 2010, 10:20 am

the hubris of being capable of supporting oneself if push comes to shove?



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

30 Sep 2010, 10:36 am

ikorack wrote:
the hubris of being capable of supporting oneself if push comes to shove?


19 Facts About the Deindustrialization of America


What's that about us being capable of supporting ourselves?


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

30 Sep 2010, 11:14 am

skafather84 wrote:
ikorack wrote:
the hubris of being capable of supporting oneself if push comes to shove?


19 Facts About the Deindustrialization of America


What's that about us being capable of supporting ourselves?


http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-02-17/b ... ts-profits

We are very much capable of supporting ourselves those factories may be unused but they are not all demolished or converted to other uses.

EDIT: those corporations can be brought back by reestablishing tariffs and fining a company that does most of its manufacturing overseas.