Page 2 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

04 Nov 2010, 11:48 pm

richardbenson wrote:
I'm confused. how can the gold standard create a bubble in economics? isnt that why they call it the gold standard? iron clad sort to speak? and i still like calvin coolidge i dont care if you think he caused the great depression because i know he didnt

im not a ecomoics professor but i think alot of things caused the great depression, it wasnt one man or one piece of legislation, but a combination of things. what about herbert hoover?

why were people calling towns hoovervilles? :roll:

personally i'm a supply side economics kindof guy :)


The gold standard did not cause the problem - it simply made it impossible to solve it. The problem was the bubble economy and the resulting debt deflation. Supply side is a bad idea because wealth concentrates at the top and the very wealthy use the money to inflate bubbles. The bubbles eventually burst and this can be disastrous. In 1929, the US had the worst income and wealth inequality in its history up until then and that destabilised the economy... As for the gold standard, the gold standard tied the hands of the authorities to fight the Depression. Those that abandoned the gold standard the first got out of it quickest. The USA devalued the dollar substantially against gold under FDR.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

04 Nov 2010, 11:53 pm

ruveyn wrote:
xenon13 wrote:
Smoot-Hawley? That's such a myth. Liquidationism and deflationism and the gold standard had far more to do with it and even Milton Friedman is known for blaming the gold standard... preferring money over people, that was the problem.

That however was not the main problem, the gold standard. The main problem was a bubble under Coolidge burst and debt deflation resulted. This debt deflation could only be countered by fiscal and monetary stimulus or debt write-downs but the guardians of money refused... so back to preferring money over people.

Coolidge started it with his bubble voodoo economics nonsense.


Under Coolidge the country was prosperous. The problems started in the Hoover Administration, not the Coolidge Administration. In 1932 the Hoover people started to do what FDR finished doing in the New Deal. It did not work for either Hoover or FDR. What rescued the U.S. was the war in Europe. Adolph Hitler got us out of the Depression, not FDR.

ruveyn


It was a bubble economy and the benefits were very unevenly divided. True, there was progress in those years such as electrification and the like, and Herbert Hoover was very visible in these efforts as Commerce Secretary - more visible really than Coolidge. But Coolidge's approach made the crash inevitable. Even the Austrians say so, speaking of "malinvestment" caused by his policies.

The War was the New Deal on steroids and vindicated FDR's approach though some might say it showed that he was too timid and too concerned about deficits and debts for his own good and that of the country. He didn't go far enough in the '30s and the war proved it.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

04 Nov 2010, 11:57 pm

There's one more thing people should know. The Treasury Secretary under Harding, Coolidge and most of the Hoover administration was Andrew Mellon, whose response to the Depression was "liquidate land, liquidate labour, liquidate farmers, liquidate stocks... and purge the rottenness from the system...people will work harder and live a more moral life". He was Treasury Secretary under Coolidge and also under Harding - the 1921 so-called depression recently popularised by Glenn Beck, he was there for 1929-31 also... this idea that 1921 proved that laissez-faire works does not explain how the same Treasury Secretary failed so miserably in 1929-31.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

05 Nov 2010, 12:17 am

xenon13 wrote:
richardbenson wrote:
I'm confused. how can the gold standard create a bubble in economics? isnt that why they call it the gold standard? iron clad sort to speak? and i still like calvin coolidge i dont care if you think he caused the great depression because i know he didnt

im not a ecomoics professor but i think alot of things caused the great depression, it wasnt one man or one piece of legislation, but a combination of things. what about herbert hoover?

why were people calling towns hoovervilles? :roll:

personally i'm a supply side economics kindof guy :)


The gold standard did not cause the problem - it simply made it impossible to solve it. The problem was the bubble economy and the resulting debt deflation. Supply side is a bad idea because wealth concentrates at the top and the very wealthy use the money to inflate bubbles. The bubbles eventually burst and this can be disastrous. In 1929, the US had the worst income and wealth inequality in its history up until then and that destabilised the economy... As for the gold standard, the gold standard tied the hands of the authorities to fight the Depression. Those that abandoned the gold standard the first got out of it quickest. The USA devalued the dollar substantially against gold under FDR.


The gold standard is equivalent to having a fixed exchange rate which is equivalent to having a universal currency between nations. So basically it increased the scale of the Great Depression. Instead of being a phenomena within the US borders it became truly global. Of course these days you don't even need gold standards or fixed exchange rates to spread an economic depression around the globe.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

05 Nov 2010, 12:37 am

xenon13 wrote:
The War was the New Deal on steroids and vindicated FDR's approach though some might say it showed that he was too timid and too concerned about deficits and debts for his own good and that of the country. He didn't go far enough in the '30s and the war proved it.


QFT



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

05 Nov 2010, 12:44 am

LKL wrote:
xenon13 wrote:
The War was the New Deal on steroids and vindicated FDR's approach though some might say it showed that he was too timid and too concerned about deficits and debts for his own good and that of the country. He didn't go far enough in the '30s and the war proved it.


QFT


And this is precisely the problem with Obama today, although Obama is also quite cozy with the scoundrels in the financial sector in contrast with FDR.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

05 Nov 2010, 1:30 am

Setting up the Cat Food Commission and repeating Deficit Terrorist propaganda was a terrible move for Obama - that nonsense about money running out and the Federal government must balance its budget as a household - never mind that it has been in debt since Van Buren after Jackson's misguided repayment of the debt that caused a depression. The USA should have elected a far older leader who remember a time before the Neoliberal Revolution (Reagan, Thatcher, Rogernomics, Mulroney, etc...)

To think there are Republicans thinking seriously about "how will we repay the debt" and how this must be done at once - the USA has been in debt since Van Buren! Since Van Buren! He left office in 1841 was it?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Nov 2010, 3:12 am

xenon13 wrote:
Setting up the Cat Food Commission and repeating Deficit Terrorist propaganda was a terrible move for Obama - that nonsense about money running out and the Federal government must balance its budget as a household - never mind that it has been in debt since Van Buren after Jackson's misguided repayment of the debt that caused a depression. The USA should have elected a far older leader who remember a time before the Neoliberal Revolution (Reagan, Thatcher, Rogernomics, Mulroney, etc...)

To think there are Republicans thinking seriously about "how will we repay the debt" and how this must be done at once - the USA has been in debt since Van Buren! Since Van Buren! He left office in 1841 was it?


Debt and Deficit are workable as long as the levels are kept low relative to income. Our national debt is now approaching our GDP.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

05 Nov 2010, 8:12 am

If you want to understand the role of business in the USA listen to the long lecture at http://www.bu.edu/buniverse/view/?v=20ZaW9PO



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Nov 2010, 9:26 am

Sand wrote:
If you want to understand the role of business in the USA listen to the long lecture at http://www.bu.edu/buniverse/view/?v=20ZaW9PO


Howard Zinn lecture indeed! Zinn was a sh*t. Bill Moyers is a well versed Pinko Stinko Liberal with a good vocabulary.

ruveyn



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

05 Nov 2010, 9:45 am

xenon13 wrote:
richardbenson wrote:
I'm confused. how can the gold standard create a bubble in economics? isnt that why they call it the gold standard? iron clad sort to speak? and i still like calvin coolidge i dont care if you think he caused the great depression because i know he didnt

im not a ecomoics professor but i think alot of things caused the great depression, it wasnt one man or one piece of legislation, but a combination of things. what about herbert hoover?

why were people calling towns hoovervilles? :roll:

personally i'm a supply side economics kindof guy :)


The gold standard did not cause the problem - it simply made it impossible to solve it. The problem was the bubble economy and the resulting debt deflation. Supply side is a bad idea because wealth concentrates at the top and the very wealthy use the money to inflate bubbles. The bubbles eventually burst and this can be disastrous. In 1929, the US had the worst income and wealth inequality in its history up until then and that destabilised the economy... As for the gold standard, the gold standard tied the hands of the authorities to fight the Depression. Those that abandoned the gold standard the first got out of it quickest. The USA devalued the dollar substantially against gold under FDR.

I'm, not going to act like i know anything about economics, but who will create the jobs if the wealthy dont? dont you have to have wealth in order to make it? i've never heard of a poor person creating 1,000 jobs out of thin air?

is the demand side any better? i dont know. I agree that devaluing the dollar is a very bad idea, and we need to restore that :pig: as soon as possible


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

05 Nov 2010, 10:14 am

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
If you want to understand the role of business in the USA listen to the long lecture at http://www.bu.edu/buniverse/view/?v=20ZaW9PO


Howard Zinn lecture indeed! Zinn was a sh*t. Bill Moyers is a well versed Pinko Stinko Liberal with a good vocabulary.

ruveyn


There are none so deaf as those who will not hear. The stupidest reaction to an argument is to resort to name calling.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Nov 2010, 10:46 am

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
If you want to understand the role of business in the USA listen to the long lecture at http://www.bu.edu/buniverse/view/?v=20ZaW9PO


Howard Zinn lecture indeed! Zinn was a sh*t. Bill Moyers is a well versed Pinko Stinko Liberal with a good vocabulary.

ruveyn


There are none so deaf as those who will not hear. The stupidest reaction to an argument is to resort to name calling.


I could have cried Treason! to Moyers call to insurrection. But I did not.

Both Zinn and Moyers want the labor unions back in power. That means rule by the thugs.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

05 Nov 2010, 11:01 am

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
If you want to understand the role of business in the USA listen to the long lecture at http://www.bu.edu/buniverse/view/?v=20ZaW9PO


Howard Zinn lecture indeed! Zinn was a sh*t. Bill Moyers is a well versed Pinko Stinko Liberal with a good vocabulary.

ruveyn


There are none so deaf as those who will not hear. The stupidest reaction to an argument is to resort to name calling.


I could have cried Treason! to Moyers call to insurrection. But I did not.

Both Zinn and Moyers want the labor unions back in power. That means rule by the thugs.

ruveyn


And the total corruption of all sectors of government by corporate lobbies is not thuggery?
It was the rise of the power of unions that established the 8 hour work day, social security and all the other contributions to the growth of the middle class and the establishment of a living wage.. That's thuggery?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Nov 2010, 11:03 am

Sand wrote:
And the total corruption of all sectors of government by corporate lobbies is not thuggery?
It was the rise of the power of unions that established the 8 hour work day, social security and all the other contributions to the growth of the middle class and the establishment of a living wage.. That's thuggery?


It also created Jimmy Hoffa.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

05 Nov 2010, 11:07 am

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
And the total corruption of all sectors of government by corporate lobbies is not thuggery?
It was the rise of the power of unions that established the 8 hour work day, social security and all the other contributions to the growth of the middle class and the establishment of a living wage.. That's thuggery?


It also created Jimmy Hoffa.

ruveyn


And business created Enron, amongst other crooked organizations. What does that prove.