Page 2 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

23 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm

skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.


immortality leads to infinite boredom.

ruveyn



johnpipe108
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Age: 80
Gender: Male
Posts: 227
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA

23 Nov 2010, 5:41 pm

"In the beginning there was Existence, One only, without a second. Some say that in the beginning there was non-existence only, and that out of that the universe was born. But how could such a thing be? How could existence be born of non-existence? No, my son, in the beginning there was existence alone--One, only, without a second. He, the One, thought to himself: Let me be many, let me grow forth. Thus out of himself he projected the universe; and having projected out of himself the universe, he entered into every being. All that is has its self in him alone. Of all things he is the subtle essence. He is the truth. He is the Self. And that, Svetaketu, THAT ART THOU."

... Uddalaka to his son Svetaketu, from the Chandogya Upanishad

It may interest you to know, that contemporary physics agrees with the first line of the above. "One only, without a second" means no duality, i.e., NO ATOMIC STRUCTURE. This is the conclusion of modern physics, that there was no atomic structure before the universe sprang forth, only an as yet unknown (to modern science, at any rate) form of energy. Einstein's Law of Conservation agrees with that:

Matter and Energy are one, and can be neither created nor destroyed." One could, if one desired, replace the word energy with the word spirit, and it would mean essentially the same thing.

The universe springs from self-existent, "immortal" energy, which one could simply call "the life force." "Neither created nor destroyed" defines the eternal, known in the ancient philosophy as the self-existent.

Also according to physics, the universe began with the fundamental duality, hydrogen (one electron, one proton).

Science tells us that our thoughts are just energy; but since energy cannot cease, the concept of individual immortality of consciousness is a valid hypotheses. In the Bhagavad Gita, the philosophical teaching is "Bodies are said to die, but that which inhabits the body cannot die, nor be limited; therefore you must act, O Arjuna." (Arjuna is here a metaphor for mankind)

The Vedic physicists proposed that the universe comes and goes regularly, with the period of the manifest (i.e., relativity) equal to the period of the un-manifest (the non-relative, or steady state); in electrical engineering, we call that a 50% duty cycle. This agrees with the laws of thermodynamics, as it is energy conservation (we use this principal in power-supply design). This is also upheld by the laws of mathematical probability.

Probability would hold that there was never a first, nor will there ever be a last universe; this is an infinite concept that one cannot readily wrap one's mind around.

Think of a graph, consisting of an infinite series of sine curves, with the bottom halves cut off and replaced with straight lines; the peaks represent the universe expanding from the beginning, and contracting back to the steady state (the straight lines).

Interesting that the Vedic science includes the warning "Do not oppress an atom, for it will bombard your life and existence of physical basis", and it certainly has! Suggests that they knew something about energy. When the universe does contract, the energy would intensify the "gravity," and once one planet reached critical mass, it should start the chain-reaction that returns the universe to the steady state (Einstein destroyed Newton's concept of gravity, which concept Newton was never completely happy with; "gravity" is actually the result of the mass of the energy in space pressing down).

Your thoughts, from the perspective of Physics (aka "Natural Philosophy")?

Regards, John

Fission is the art of destruction, and fusion the art of creation; science has mastered the art of destruction, but they have not mastered the art of creation.


_________________
He who sees all beings in the Self, and the Self in all beings, hates none -- Isha Upanishad

Bom Shankar Bholenath! I do not "have a syndrome", nor do I "have a disorder," I am a "Natural Born Scholar!"


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

23 Nov 2010, 6:49 pm

ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.


immortality leads to infinite boredom.

ruveyn


Especially if you assume your overwhelming intellect has revealed all to you and you totally lack creativity and imagination.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

23 Nov 2010, 7:35 pm

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.


immortality leads to infinite boredom.

ruveyn


Especially if you assume your overwhelming intellect has revealed all to you and you totally lack creativity and imagination.




There's also the issue of everything else expiring around you; including friends, family, etc (possibly a library of all knowledge a la the Library of Alexandria or maybe just within society itself like in the dark ages).


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,593
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

23 Nov 2010, 7:36 pm

JNathanK wrote:
Sand wrote:
People who have a predisposition for shallow thought throw terms like "infinite" and "immortal" around as if they were things obvious and easily comprehended whereas they are actually mere sounds not quite as informational as the babble of a brook or an occasional sneeze. It's BS. Humans are animals and cannot escape that.


Infinity is a mathematical concept that identifies that all conceptual limitations are ultimately arbitrary and that there is no reason why a line, plane, three dimensional space, shouldn't continue on forever. Immortality is the idea that death is, in some way, illusory and that a part of you is eternal in some respect. These mere sounds, as you call them, have very well established meanings behind them.

They are however utter hubris, rubbish, and comico-tragedy to those who have a personal emotive allergy to the idea :). You can't change that in people though, we start from an irrational emotional core from which all of reality is figured or disfigured from that.

skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.

That sounds like functional fixedness, a minty sugar cube or two might get your pineal gland back out of slumber.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

23 Nov 2010, 7:50 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.

That sounds like functional fixedness, a minty sugar cube or two might get your pineal gland back out of slumber.



My "pineal gland" could use some stimulation.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,593
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

23 Nov 2010, 7:55 pm

skafather84 wrote:
There's also the issue of everything else expiring around you; including friends, family, etc (possibly a library of all knowledge a la the Library of Alexandria or maybe just within society itself like in the dark ages).

Ah wait, you meant 'living' forever. Being capped in this body and its limits for eternity would suck, that I'd agree with. Hopefully all that could be augmented, widdled away, and replaced with the right technology, know-how, and proper personal artistic/expressive flare.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

23 Nov 2010, 7:56 pm

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.


immortality leads to infinite boredom.

ruveyn


Especially if you assume your overwhelming intellect has revealed all to you and you totally lack creativity and imagination.


Human intellect has an upper bound. Once achieved boredom is inevitable. I will settle for a finite interesting life. When I die there will be stuff that I miss out on. That is the way it goes.

Forever is way too long for a human being.

ruveyn



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,593
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

23 Nov 2010, 7:59 pm

johnpipe108 wrote:
"In the beginning there was Existence, One only, without a second. Some say that in the beginning there was non-existence only, and that out of that the universe was born. But how could such a thing be? How could existence be born of non-existence? No, my son, in the beginning there was existence alone--One, only, without a second. He, the One, thought to himself: Let me be many, let me grow forth. Thus out of himself he projected the universe; and having projected out of himself the universe, he entered into every being. All that is has its self in him alone. Of all things he is the subtle essence. He is the truth. He is the Self. And that, Svetaketu, THAT ART THOU."

... Uddalaka to his son Svetaketu, from the Chandogya Upanishad

It may interest you to know, that contemporary physics agrees with the first line of the above. "One only, without a second" means no duality, i.e., NO ATOMIC STRUCTURE. This is the conclusion of modern physics, that there was no atomic structure before the universe sprang forth, only an as yet unknown (to modern science, at any rate) form of energy. Einstein's Law of Conservation agrees with that:

Matter and Energy are one, and can be neither created nor destroyed." One could, if one desired, replace the word energy with the word spirit, and it would mean essentially the same thing.

The universe springs from self-existent, "immortal" energy, which one could simply call "the life force." "Neither created nor destroyed" defines the eternal, known in the ancient philosophy as the self-existent.

Also according to physics, the universe began with the fundamental duality, hydrogen (one electron, one proton).

Science tells us that our thoughts are just energy; but since energy cannot cease, the concept of individual immortality of consciousness is a valid hypotheses. In the Bhagavad Gita, the philosophical teaching is "Bodies are said to die, but that which inhabits the body cannot die, nor be limited; therefore you must act, O Arjuna." (Arjuna is here a metaphor for mankind)

The Vedic physicists proposed that the universe comes and goes regularly, with the period of the manifest (i.e., relativity) equal to the period of the un-manifest (the non-relative, or steady state); in electrical engineering, we call that a 50% duty cycle. This agrees with the laws of thermodynamics, as it is energy conservation (we use this principal in power-supply design). This is also upheld by the laws of mathematical probability.

Probability would hold that there was never a first, nor will there ever be a last universe; this is an infinite concept that one cannot readily wrap one's mind around.

Think of a graph, consisting of an infinite series of sine curves, with the bottom halves cut off and replaced with straight lines; the peaks represent the universe expanding from the beginning, and contracting back to the steady state (the straight lines).

Interesting that the Vedic science includes the warning "Do not oppress an atom, for it will bombard your life and existence of physical basis", and it certainly has! Suggests that they knew something about energy. When the universe does contract, the energy would intensify the "gravity," and once one planet reached critical mass, it should start the chain-reaction that returns the universe to the steady state (Einstein destroyed Newton's concept of gravity, which concept Newton was never completely happy with; "gravity" is actually the result of the mass of the energy in space pressing down).

Your thoughts, from the perspective of Physics (aka "Natural Philosophy")?

Regards, John

Fission is the art of destruction, and fusion the art of creation; science has mastered the art of destruction, but they have not mastered the art of creation.


If you haven't read the Tripartite Tractate I'd highly recommend it. Definitely something you'd appreciate.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

23 Nov 2010, 9:05 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.


immortality leads to infinite boredom.

ruveyn


Especially if you assume your overwhelming intellect has revealed all to you and you totally lack creativity and imagination.


Human intellect has an upper bound. Once achieved boredom is inevitable. I will settle for a finite interesting life. When I die there will be stuff that I miss out on. That is the way it goes.

Forever is way too long for a human being.

ruveyn


At almost 85 I have been through a few things,the depression, WWII, the good years in the USA. I've lived in New York, Paris, Berlin while the wall was up and the Russians were doing their mischief, Israel during the 6 day war, Tennessee while I marched with CORE and had a cross burned on my lawn, and now in Helsinki. My parents and my wife died of cancer, my younger son was rendered quadriplegic on a respirator at the age of three and died at the age of 32. I watched the Moon landing on TV. I've done a few things but nothing sensational. I've hardly begun to live. I haven't even scratched the surface. I'll take a shot at eternity anytime it's offered.



johnpipe108
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Age: 80
Gender: Male
Posts: 227
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA

23 Nov 2010, 9:06 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:

If you haven't read the Tripartite Tractate I'd highly recommend it. Definitely something you'd appreciate.


Thanks very much! That is very interesting, especially since it comes from early Christian era, and non-Roman. The Father definition certainly seems to illustrate the influence claimed for the Upanishads upon early Christianity (the language of expression is very similar); that's also the first I've seen of gnostic literature. It should take me a while to get through the whole thing, once I've finished Luther's Address to the German Nobility and Concerning Christian Liberty, that I had started reading previously and am already partway though.

I found this Link to the text online


_________________
He who sees all beings in the Self, and the Self in all beings, hates none -- Isha Upanishad

Bom Shankar Bholenath! I do not "have a syndrome", nor do I "have a disorder," I am a "Natural Born Scholar!"


JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

23 Nov 2010, 9:43 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
JNathanK wrote:
Sand wrote:
People who have a predisposition for shallow thought throw terms like "infinite" and "immortal" around as if they were things obvious and easily comprehended whereas they are actually mere sounds not quite as informational as the babble of a brook or an occasional sneeze. It's BS. Humans are animals and cannot escape that.


Infinity is a mathematical concept that identifies that all conceptual limitations are ultimately arbitrary and that there is no reason why a line, plane, three dimensional space, shouldn't continue on forever. Immortality is the idea that death is, in some way, illusory and that a part of you is eternal in some respect. These mere sounds, as you call them, have very well established meanings behind them.

They are however utter hubris, rubbish, and comico-tragedy to those who have a personal emotive allergy to the idea :). You can't change that in people though, we start from an irrational emotional core from which all of reality is figured or disfigured from that.

skafather84 wrote:
I can't imagine a fate any worse than immortality.

That sounds like functional fixedness, a minty sugar cube or two might get your pineal gland back out of slumber.


I don't see why its so hard to entertain the idea though. I couldn't think of anything more positive than a rational basis that this universe isn't just some finite anomaly that'll never ever reoccur again. I don't really get the resistance and the offense toward me pointing out the logical fallacy in the notion of something coming from nothing.



Last edited by JNathanK on 23 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Foxx
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 340

23 Nov 2010, 9:49 pm

"Knowledge is immortal
Knowledge is immortality

History withers, dies and is forgotten, but knowledge remains

immortality is BS
we need to die to give place to the next generation
else we would all be the same
ruled by the same
become stagnant in the pool of life

Knowledge is BS
It has wemoved us from what we are
it carries us to near-certain death
it makes us a threat to life
it makes us a threat to knowledge"

- me, just right now



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

23 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Quote:

At almost 85 I have been through a few things,the depression, WWII, the good years in the USA. I've lived in New York, Paris, Berlin while the wall was up and the Russians were doing their mischief, Israel during the 6 day war, Tennessee while I marched with CORE and had a cross burned on my lawn, and now in Helsinki. My parents and my wife died of cancer, my younger son was rendered quadriplegic on a respirator at the age of three and died at the age of 32. I watched the Moon landing on TV. I've done a few things but nothing sensational. I've hardly begun to live. I haven't even scratched the surface. I'll take a shot at eternity anytime it's offered.
You're 85? Really? You're older than my grandfather? Anyway, immortality isn't offered. Its just intrinsic. However, change is also intrinsic. We put a lot of faith in our identities, but those identities are constructs from a physical brain that will rot away upon death. however, there is a property in matter and space time that's conscious, and when matter is organized right, you can get human consciousness. After that falls out of order, though, It doesn't mean the energy/matter and the space-time with those conscious properties won't be reorganized into new forms at later epochs.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

23 Nov 2010, 10:04 pm

techstepgenr8tion wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
There's also the issue of everything else expiring around you; including friends, family, etc (possibly a library of all knowledge a la the Library of Alexandria or maybe just within society itself like in the dark ages).

Ah wait, you meant 'living' forever. Being capped in this body and its limits for eternity would suck, that I'd agree with. Hopefully all that could be augmented, widdled away, and replaced with the right technology, know-how, and proper personal artistic/expressive flare.


Being uploaded isn't something I think I'd mind. So long as there was a means to go forward, it'd be fine. Just stuck in this body forever would be pretty craptastic.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,593
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

23 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Being uploaded isn't something I think I'd mind. So long as there was a means to go forward, it'd be fine. Just stuck in this body forever would be pretty craptastic.

Hyper-dimensionality would be pretty hot as well.