Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

25 Nov 2010, 1:10 pm

Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Philologos wrote:
Good point. You should try it. I personally am the same personality model as Doubting Thomas - I have not left anything unexamined [including close to daily reexamination] since 8th grade [I fear I swallowed some stuff whole before then].


I will bet you assume the world that you perceive is not an hallucination. Am I right?

Here is a problem for you: Prove the entire cosmos was not created this morning and we came into being instantly with all our "memories".

ruveyn


Prove that we did.


The matter is purely suppositional and not succeptable to either proof or disproof

ruveyn



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 83
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

25 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm

Ruveyn -

I am not clear what that is in aid of, but:

Yes, I [continue to] operate on the working hypothesis that I exist [Descartes or nay] and that the world I seem to think I perceive exists.

There is no clear proof of any of that, but there seems no advantage theoretical or practical to accepting the opposite.

AND, yes, I agree, and have many times pointed out, there is no proof - as long as I am INSIDE the system - that the universe did not come into existence, complete with navel, this very microsecond, nor that it will not flick out of existence as I type the next lett



If I could remember numbers, names and titles [words I am good at] I would refer you to the interesting sci fi tale which hypothesized a universe on a kind of AC principle - alternating slices of existence / non existence imperceptible like the sequence of frames in the cinema.

NOTE -

If you are going to live in this world, you cannot insist on PROOF - all the evidence is not inside the cage. I live off best working hypothesis.