xenon13 wrote:
The main problem remains - and everyone knew this when Obama was seen as some kind of hope - and that's the plutocracy has an absolute stranglehold on the system, one that rigs the system better than Iran's Guardian Council can even think of doing. People were in denial about Obama's nature because they were saying to themselves that "this is the best that's possible"... and there was this strange hope that he'd reveal himself to be better than a plutocracy approved product, that he just had to talk a good plutocratic game to be elected. This is evidence of a severe lack of democracy.
Obama had a sweeping new agenda. That was clear from his speeches, campaign promises, and judges he appointed. It's not for a lack of effort that Obama didn't keep his promises. He didn't have enough widespread support from the people or enough widespread support from congress to implement his private agenda by himself like he was hoping to do, so he had to negotiate with the establishment.
_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown
"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud