Page 2 of 2 [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Favorite Philosopher
Socrates 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Aristotle 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Plato 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Descartes 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Locke 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Hume 9%  9%  [ 3 ]
Nietzsche 18%  18%  [ 6 ]
Kant 15%  15%  [ 5 ]
Russell 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Kierkegaard 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Marx 6%  6%  [ 2 ]
Spinoza 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Rand 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Sartre 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Other 21%  21%  [ 7 ]
Total votes : 33

georgewbush
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 138

19 Jan 2011, 3:05 pm

Yes, I understand that I left many philosophers out. It would be impossible to list them all. I presumed there was poll limit, I did not make an exhaustive list. Though it seems only one vote went to the Other option, so it seems I made an optimal list.



TechnicalPacifist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 606
Location: Bohuslän

19 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm

Marx. Can't deny the beard.



Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

19 Jan 2011, 6:36 pm

Other: Laozi.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

19 Jan 2011, 7:04 pm

georgewbush wrote:
Yes, I understand that I left many philosophers out. It would be impossible to list them all. I presumed there was poll limit, I did not make an exhaustive list. Though it seems only one vote went to the Other option, so it seems I made an optimal list.

Either that, or most people prefer to vote for a philosopher on the list, rather than put up a position of "other", which would either be meaningless given the lack of data it gives, or require explanation.

I mean, I know that I would rather pick a philosopher on the list.



stgiordanobruno
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

09 Feb 2011, 4:27 am

I voted for Hume for his scepticism of supernatural phenomena and supernatural afterlives and giving more credence to metempsychosis over the doctrine of Heaven and Hell of Christian denominations - metempsychosis being closer to biological reality than the latter.



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

09 Feb 2011, 4:36 am

Favorite philosopher: George W. Bush!



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Feb 2011, 7:01 am

Kant was bogus. He could not overcome Hume's skepticism. Kant loses on this point: there is not such thing a necessary synthetic a priori proposition. All meaningful declarative propositions are either analytic (true by definition), synthetic (true by empirical evidence) or conventional (rules of the game).

ruveyn



ryan93
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,315
Location: Galway, Ireland

09 Feb 2011, 8:10 am

ruveyn wrote:
Kant was bogus. He could not overcome Hume's skepticism. Kant loses on this point: there is not such thing a necessary synthetic a priori proposition. All meaningful declarative propositions are either analytic (true by definition), synthetic (true by empirical evidence) or conventional (rules of the game).

ruveyn


Does Decarte's "Cognito ergo sum" fall under the category of synthetic (true by empirical evidence, tells us something about the world) and a priori (true by definition).


_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger

Member of the WP Strident Atheists


Fudo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,696

09 Feb 2011, 9:35 am

i'm mostly unaware of the majority of these philosophers' thoughts, a fact i'm none too proud of, but i voted Socrates, Descartes and Kant because their ideas on the nature of knowledge, reality and perception inspired a great deal of thought in me and made me question quite a few things. would love to learn more.
fudo



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Feb 2011, 10:23 am

ryan93 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kant was bogus. He could not overcome Hume's skepticism. Kant loses on this point: there is not such thing a necessary synthetic a priori proposition. All meaningful declarative propositions are either analytic (true by definition), synthetic (true by empirical evidence) or conventional (rules of the game).

ruveyn


Does Decarte's "Cognito ergo sum" fall under the category of synthetic (true by empirical evidence, tells us something about the world) and a priori (true by definition).


It is a convention. It is one of Decartes assumption. It is neither an empirical assertion (such as "I think"
or "I am"). The "therefore" is what makes the assertion purely axiomatic and conventional.

It is in the same class of assertion as "two points determine a straight line which pass through them".

These statements are "rules of the game". Neither a definition nor an empirically determined fact.

ruveyn



graywyvern
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2010
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 667
Location: texas

10 Feb 2011, 3:13 pm

besides Wittgenstein: Simone Weil.


_________________
"I have always found that Angels have the vanity
to speak of themselves as the only wise; this they
do with a confident insolence sprouting from systematic
reasoning." --William Blake


mightypen515
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 143

11 Feb 2011, 1:33 am

James Hetfield & Lars Ulrich.



Thandurin
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 56

11 Feb 2011, 1:43 am

Voted for Nietzsche and his mustache.