Ron Paul wins CPAC, Romney 2nd, Johnson 3rd,Palin 9th LOL

Page 2 of 2 [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

13 Feb 2011, 4:35 am

Jacoby wrote:
Romney probably could win the presidency if he got the nomination, he's just like Obama but he'd probably actually be able to push legislation. God help us. :roll:

Romney strikes me as a sleazy opportunist. This means that he will pretend to be left, right, or center as expedience demands. However, he is also a reasonably competent administrator, and oddly enough his opportunism may manifest as "pragmatism" to end up with a halfway-decent President.

Quote:
The GOP nomination will be a "Tea Party" candidate, I'll guarantee it. Whether it's the real Tea Party or the neocon rip-off I dunno but that is where ALL the momentum is. Just look at this past November.

How's that again? The Tea Party cost the Republicans the Senate last November. And while they can win individual congressional races (even a fairly large number of them) they simply do not have the sort of broad appeal to be serious contenders in a Presidential election. There will be several Tea Partiers in the primary races, and they'll split votes enough that a more establishment-leaning Republican will likely win the nomination.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

13 Feb 2011, 7:20 am

Orwell wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Romney probably could win the presidency if he got the nomination, he's just like Obama but he'd probably actually be able to push legislation. God help us. :roll:

Romney strikes me as a sleazy opportunist. This means that he will pretend to be left, right, or center as expedience demands. However, he is also a reasonably competent administrator, and oddly enough his opportunism may manifest as "pragmatism" to end up with a halfway-decent President.

Quote:
The GOP nomination will be a "Tea Party" candidate, I'll guarantee it. Whether it's the real Tea Party or the neocon rip-off I dunno but that is where ALL the momentum is. Just look at this past November.

How's that again? The Tea Party cost the Republicans the Senate last November. And while they can win individual congressional races (even a fairly large number of them) they simply do not have the sort of broad appeal to be serious contenders in a Presidential election. There will be several Tea Partiers in the primary races, and they'll split votes enough that a more establishment-leaning Republican will likely win the nomination.


If the T.P. spit the vote the Democrats might win the presidency again in the next election. If they do not run Obama they could very well do the thing. After four years of Obama I got the notion that Hillary would have been the better choice.

ruveyn



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

13 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm

Orwell wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
Romney probably could win the presidency if he got the nomination, he's just like Obama but he'd probably actually be able to push legislation. God help us. :roll:

Romney strikes me as a sleazy opportunist. This means that he will pretend to be left, right, or center as expedience demands. However, he is also a reasonably competent administrator, and oddly enough his opportunism may manifest as "pragmatism" to end up with a halfway-decent President.


Scary we agree on this point.

Orwell wrote:
Quote:
The GOP nomination will be a "Tea Party" candidate, I'll guarantee it. Whether it's the real Tea Party or the neocon rip-off I dunno but that is where ALL the momentum is. Just look at this past November.

How's that again? The Tea Party cost the Republicans the Senate last November. And while they can win individual congressional races (even a fairly large number of them) they simply do not have the sort of broad appeal to be serious contenders in a Presidential election. There will be several Tea Partiers in the primary races, and they'll split votes enough that a more establishment-leaning Republican will likely win the nomination.


Actually one could argue that not winning the senate is a good thing, that way the Democrats can't effectively blame the Republicans when the garbage that the Dems put in place start taking effect. Republicans can instead turn around saying we're trying to fix the problem but the Democrats in the Senate are stubborn donkeys that can't get it through their head that far-left policies don't work.