Natty_Boh wrote:
Quote:
It looks to me as if Isaiah is speaking directly to Ahaz, specifically about a kid who is about to be born in the immediate future. The kid is going to serve as a "sign", explicitly for Ahaz. I don't perceive it in any way as speaking about any future Messiah, about Jesus, nor about any miraculous virgin birth.
He was doing exactly as you say. But it was also a Messianic prophecy. The Old Testament is littered with that sort of thing - signs and prophecies that held one meaning then; another, greater meaning later.
Only if you're cherry-picking, and taking passages way out of context.
Quote:
Moses lifting up the bronze serpent/Christ being lifted up on the Cross. Jonah in the whale three days/Christ saying that in the same way, he will be in the tomb three days. The prediction of the birth of Hezekiah - a deliverer - becoming a prophecy of the birth of Jesus - the deliverer. The Old Testament looking forward to the New. We're not Marcionites.
Hezekiah smashed to pieces the bronze snake that Moses had made (see 2 Kings 18:4). Moses putting the bronze serpent on a pole (so that people could look at it and be healed of snake bites) had nothing to do with Jesus on the cross.
Jonah was inside the fish (not a whale) for 3 days and 3 nights. Jesus was in the tomb for only 2 nights.
Hezekiah's birth had nothing to do with Jesus' birth, nor was there any anticipation that Jesus' mother would be a Virgin.
I don't perceive the Old Testament as looking forward to the New at all. All that you have are a few passages being taken out of context and interpreted bizarrely to establish the foundation of a new religion. I could also cherrypick a few passages here and there, make up some bizarre interpretations, and PRESTO! my own religion! A virgin birth, based upon Isaiah 7, you have to admit is quite far-fetched.